[RD] What does free speech mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You've really done an excellent job of succinctly demonstrating every one of my points.
 
You've really done an excellent job of succinctly demonstrating every one of my points.

I'm sorry are you taking offense? Your point was that you get up in a twist when the viewpoints you side with are challenged and rather than engaging in discussion you cry about the challenges and play victim pretending that you are being attacked. Because you can't take criticism of your guy Trump for his actual words and actions. Because your bigotry against trans people is not tolerated by everyone. Because you want your kind of speech protected while knocking that of others. But at least you are not trying to mask behind civility and decency and are happy to let everyone see you for who you are.
 
Last edited:
Transphobic implies hatred our fear the sport thing is WTH lol.
 
AP_18051792685092_c0-135-3154-1973_s885x516.jpg

1544270176688.jpg

GTY-Kelly-Defina.jpg

Telfer_NCAA.0.png

Dude, its a real thing.

Yeah it's causing problems here with amateur level sports events and women getting salty.

Transphobic!!

https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-s...gories-due-to-trans-athletes-unfair-advantage

This is my local uni, it's very liberal.

https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-s...sport-after-laurel-hubbards-controversial-win

Science
https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-s...es-born-male-a-massive-advantage-over-females
 
Last edited:
Yes Zard your transphobia is rooted in fear.

I don't care to much either way. I provided a link to a scientific study by someone with a relevent degree from a liberal university with a good reputation in one if the least corrupt countries in the world. It's not from Trump or Liberty university.

That's science. Dismissing it outright us roughly the same as the right dismissing climate change science.
 
I'm not sure what's given you the impression that I'm "riled up," but you have made it clear in an antagonistic sort of way that we have a difference of opinion on this subject.

Plenty of things have been mislabeled "hate" speech. Trump and the republicans spread "hate" for simply existing. Disagreeing that pre-pubescent children being put on hormones and given sex changes is hate. Misgendering someone is hate. Believing that biological men shouldn't be allowed in the women's washroom or in women's sports is hate. Wanting to secure the border or reduce immigration is hate. Mentioning black crime statistics is hate, etc. etc. Most things that aren't part of the mainstream democratic platform has been labeled hate by someone at some point and the standard response to any of this is the "no true Scotsman" or just a straight up denial.

You haven't actually been stopped from saying any of these things have you, but free speech works both ways. If you come on a forum and express your views you can't really complain if people tell you what they think of those views.
 
I don't care to much either way. I provided a link to a scientific study by someone with a relevent degree from a liberal university with a good reputation in one if the least corrupt countries in the world. It's not from Trump or Liberty university.

That's science. Dismissing it outright us roughly the same as the right dismissing climate change science.

Because transpersons in sports is the main point here. Sure Zard, continue to play defense for obviously bigoted viewpoints, especially when BC is more likely an alt created for the sole purpose of spouting his bigotry because his feelings were hurt otherwise. But You do you.
 
You haven't actually been stopped from saying any of these things have you
Well that's pretty hard to do on the internet unless they want to ban me.
If you come on a forum and express your views you can't really complain if people tell you what they think of those views
I haven't complained. I stated my opinion, was asked a question and I responded to it. Then I was attacked and now I'm commenting on it only because you brought it up.

I do think its unnecessary to attack someone for stating a opinion on a discussion form? Yeah, simply for the fact that it defeats the purpose of even bothering to enter the "discussion." At that point it's just reeee'ing.
 
Last edited:
Because transpersons in sports is the main point here. Sure Zard, continue to play defense for obviously bigoted viewpoints, especially when BC is more likely an alt created for the sole purpose of spouting his bigotry because his feelings were hurt otherwise. But You do you.

It's not obviously bigoted, it's a conversation that needs to be had.

I provided a link to what science says from a physiology department from a liberal university in one of the most liberal cities in one of the most liberal countries in the world.

The article I listed isn't saying they can't compete but that they have unfair advantages and that it's unfair to cus women. They even suggested dumping gendered sports and go by weight classes.
 
Well that's pretty hard to do on the internet unless they want to ban me.

So you do have free speech. Views like yours are also found on mainstream media like Fox. They are hardly being suppressed.
I haven't complained. I stated my opinion, was asked a question and I responded to it. Then I was attacked and now I'm commenting on it only because you brought it up.

I do think its unnecessary to attack someone for stating a opinion on a discussion form? Yeah, but I honestly couldn't care less. It doesn't take much to get liberals bent out of shape.

Sounds like complaining to me.
 
So you do have free speech. Views like yours are also found on mainstream media like Fox. They are hardly being suppressed
Oh honey, Fox news is only faux conservatism.

You see, liberals 2 biggest problems are that they think they know eveything while also being very quick to assume things that they really have no way of knowing.
 
It's not obviously bigoted, it's a conversation that needs to be had.

I provided a link to what science says from a physiology department from a liberal university in one of the most liberal cities in one of the most liberal countries in the world.

The article I listed isn't saying they can't compete but that they have unfair advantages and that it's unfair to cus women. They even suggested dumping gendered sports and go by weight classes.

Because you ignore the casual transphobia dripping in "BC"s post where he cries foul against speech he doesn't like - ironically while lamenting that speech he agrees with is being targetted and labelled hate speech. Funny how all his examples are all textbook alt-rights talking points. You took the bait dude.
 
Because I commented on something you brought up and addressed to me? Lol.

Starting with your 1st post in this thread. Poor snowflake.

Oh honey, Fox news is only faux conservatism.

You see, liberals 2 biggest problems are that they think they know eveything while also being very quick to assume things that they really have no way of knowing.

Well at least we know just how off the scale you are now.
 
Funny how all his examples are all textbook alt-rights talking points. You took the bait dude.
Does someone who's actually quite liberal agree with something I said?

Starting with your 1st post in this thread. Poor snowflake.



Well at least we know just how off the scale you are .
My first post really did get under your skin by the sounds of it. Liberals could at least try and come up with their own insults. Its not very creative.

Can't be that far off the scale when people are agreeing with me on a liberal forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom