"Excuse me Mr Simon, but it seems that you like writing very loooooong replies, but why?"
To address the issues at hand properly of course, and to examine any points of concern on an individual basis. It means that I don't have a huge post count, but I personally regard everything I put out for public consumption as something approaching 'quality'. It is a principle of mine: If you have something to say, say it properly and in a considered manner. Not long winded, but in full detail.
Note that this is merely mine own opinion; not that having anyone else disagree with it would cause me unbridled mental anguish
It is not so much that one likes doing it, but rather it is common courtesy on my behalf to say my piece in one or two parts, rather than splatter it across two dozen monsyllabic replies. Of course, there are exceptions to this based upon what is appropriate to the situation, but I prefer to get it all out at once.
In addition, with topics that I feel engagement with, or feel strongly on (with this one, the meaning of life, being one of them) I will take time in crafting a reply which I feel carries across my meaning.
Therefore, the length of my replies is due to the fact that I feel I have something worthwhile to contribute, as does everyone in their own way.
I stand by my statements in this thread, as outlandish as they may initially seem, as it depicts one aspect of my worldview (Weltschauung?), that of a rejection of love and ease, and a preference for victory in the endeavours one commits oneself to.