I don't know - in principle, would you?
And quite a pun it was!No, it was a pun, referring to a literary device.![]()
What I hate is the Jewish (and to a lesser extent Christain) belief that it is a good thing to bring down the sins of the fathers on the sons. It's not onlyevil, but it's destructive to society - punishing it's weakest members for the sins of its strongest
This sentence is not an accurate representation of the views of Friedrich Nietzsche at all, especially not the first part. Whatever Nietzsche was, he was not a Nazi.He was a Nazi - didn't he say that altruism was motivated by hatred and that real men disregard the rules?
Which, although a paraphrasing, is more correct than what you claimed about Nietzsche earlier. Do you know why he had the Madman say, "God is dead"?He definitly said that the strong in the world should break the chains of morality and impose their own virtues (which sound a lot like self-intrest to me) on the world.
He was a Nazi - didn't he say that altruism was motivated by hatred and that real men disregard the rules?
He definitly said that the strong in the world should break the chains of morality and impose their own virtues (which sound a lot like self-intrest to me) on the world.
Depends what your definition of "evidence" is.
The best evidence I see is, how did life start?
What I don't get about athiests is how you can be sure there is no God.
Sounds close-minded to me. I can understand if you are not sure God exists or maybe being indifferent, but being absolutely sure of it?
That's probably the worst proof I've ever seen/heard.
That's probably the worst proof I've ever seen/heard.