What is the atheist's obsession with religion?

In principle, if someone could make a good pro-tooth-fairy case, I'd consider it. In reality, I don't see any reason to doubt the overwhelming evidence that the tooth fairy is your mom.
 
No, it was a pun, referring to a literary device. :lol:
And quite a pun it was! :goodjob:

Also, I didn't get jack from this so called "tooth fairy". I question the morality of an entity that distributes happiness so unfairly and arbitrarily.
 
What I hate is the Jewish (and to a lesser extent Christain) belief that it is a good thing to bring down the sins of the fathers on the sons. It's not onlyevil, but it's destructive to society - punishing it's weakest members for the sins of its strongest
 
What I hate is the Jewish (and to a lesser extent Christain) belief that it is a good thing to bring down the sins of the fathers on the sons. It's not onlyevil, but it's destructive to society - punishing it's weakest members for the sins of its strongest

Have you ever touched Nietzsche's books?
 
He was a Nazi - didn't he say that altruism was motivated by hatred and that real men disregard the rules?
This sentence is not an accurate representation of the views of Friedrich Nietzsche at all, especially not the first part. Whatever Nietzsche was, he was not a Nazi.
 
He definitly said that the strong in the world should break the chains of morality and impose their own virtues (which sound a lot like self-intrest to me) on the world.
 
He definitly said that the strong in the world should break the chains of morality and impose their own virtues (which sound a lot like self-intrest to me) on the world.
Which, although a paraphrasing, is more correct than what you claimed about Nietzsche earlier. Do you know why he had the Madman say, "God is dead"?
 
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people
suffer from a delusion it is called religion." - Robert Pirsig
 
Because it is still knocking at our door and running rampant in the government.

I have a few christian friends, I don't mind them being religious, I'm used to them being christian and they are pretty respectful of others. But there are things I'd like to see progress, (such as Evolution) that religious people try to ban. While that stuff doesn't hasn't directly affected me, it's sad to see it and there's a fear it could.
 
He was a Nazi - didn't he say that altruism was motivated by hatred and that real men disregard the rules?

:lol:

Do you know that he hates nationalism and broke with Wagner partly because of that?

He definitly said that the strong in the world should break the chains of morality and impose their own virtues (which sound a lot like self-intrest to me) on the world.

So how does your Christianity-favours-the-strong thesis sound like now?

Anyway, he said beyond good and evil, not beyond good and onto evil. Your phrasing his view in such a way is to still talk in terms of the traditional good-evil dichotomy (in the form of morality v.s. self-interest), which although might be the real implications in reality, is not quite what he said.

There are few plans that Nietzsche came up with himself (the most significant being the eternal recurrence and the closely linked idea of ubermensch). He was more of a critic of traditional systems than a founder of new ones.
 
Depends what your definition of "evidence" is.
The best evidence I see is, how did life start?
What I don't get about athiests is how you can be sure there is no God.
Sounds close-minded to me. I can understand if you are not sure God exists or maybe being indifferent, but being absolutely sure of it?

Let us say that I have absolutely no clue how life started. Now, how did life start? Well? Use your three letter word and be specific.


Actually, save your breath as ...
... you won't explain anything and you cannot explain anything.

See? There is no "God." There is no meaningful proposition. What exactly shall I be uncertain about?
 
Because it has a habit of telling them that they're evil, hell bound, sinners? :mischief:
 
A 'proper' atheist only disbelieves in God for the same reason that Christians disbelieve that the moon is made of cheese; should evidence to the contrary arise; a 'proper' atheist should change their opinion - anything else is religion.
 
That's an especially good analogy, because we were told (jokingly) as children that the moon was made of cheese, but have since realised that those tales were false. By the same vein, many of the claims of those who told us about God have been proven false as well. So, it's not outrageous that we dismiss modified claims as well ("No, the inside is made of cheese!"). Obviously, proper evidence would totally change our minds.
 
Back
Top Bottom