I also saw Enemy at the Gates on video (I have only seen good films at the cinema recently

), and was most disappointed and bemused by it.
A combination between a western and a puerile romance that showed little of the wider strategic picture was not what the movie could have been. It took a great historical period to explore, and focused the camera on their foot instead. But that is what some audiences want these days.
It was not a good old style war movie in the manner of "To Hell and Back" or "The Longest Day", and continues the trend to focus very little upon the Eastern front in film. Neither was it a true epic, instead a film that left you half full, and certainly not replete.
Cockney accents for the Soviets was not a good move, but that all tied in with ignoring the wider history for a "High Noon" style duel. Twas based upon true events, but even that could not redeem it.
Hanging the little cute kid was a distressing note to cap off a waste of 2 and a bit hours. The director has been sentenced to 40 years in Siberia as a result.
Crikey, even "13 Days" was better

(Not a great movie, nor a very good one, but good/satisfactory)