rhammer640
Russian Monk
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 386
ugh, i here ya, i barely have time to play so i can imagine finding time to mod is even harder, best of luck.
What Would Gandhi Do? - AI Rebalancing Mod
- Thread starter Sneaks
- Start date
ugh, i here ya, i barely have time to play so i can imagine finding time to mod is even harder, best of luck.
Txurce
Deity
Thanks, Sneaks - sounds good.
Azazell
Prince
Sneaks ==> i have a question about your mod
Is this mod fixes relations in diplomacy, which were added in the last patch? It is a problem that arises during the game where all AI in the same time love me or hate me
Is this mod fixes relations in diplomacy, which were added in the last patch? It is a problem that arises during the game where all AI in the same time love me or hate me
Already a new version!
What Would Gandhi Do - Version 5!
v.0.5
-Eliminates the final bits of AI happiness bonuses WITHOUT affecting player bonuses at the various handicap levels (combared to AI Equalizer, which vastly alters human handicaps)
-Adds extra starting units at Immortal and Deity levels for the AI to better prevent worker theft
Give this bad boy a few plays and let me know how you feel about the new balance
What Would Gandhi Do - Version 5!
v.0.5
-Eliminates the final bits of AI happiness bonuses WITHOUT affecting player bonuses at the various handicap levels (combared to AI Equalizer, which vastly alters human handicaps)
-Adds extra starting units at Immortal and Deity levels for the AI to better prevent worker theft
Give this bad boy a few plays and let me know how you feel about the new balance
Txurce
Deity
Sneaks - you found the Promised Land? How'd you do it (in a way a non-modder would understand)?
I am totally psyched, and will start a game Sunday, as soon as I'm done with the project that's tied me up for the last two weeks.
I created a fake Handicap level just for the AI to play with for human bonuses. It still takes the "AI" bonuses from the human selected level.
Before:
AI gets base starting happiness, population unhappiness, and unhappiness per city from HANDICAP_CHIEFTAN
AI gets aiunhappiness, production bonuses, barb bonueses, etc from the player selected handicap (HANDICAP_DEITY in my case)
Now
AI gets base starting happiness, population unhappiness, and unhappiness per city from HANDICAP_AI_STANDARD
AI gets aiunhappiness, production bonuses, barb bonueses, etc from the player selected handicap
Before:
AI gets base starting happiness, population unhappiness, and unhappiness per city from HANDICAP_CHIEFTAN
AI gets aiunhappiness, production bonuses, barb bonueses, etc from the player selected handicap (HANDICAP_DEITY in my case)
Now
AI gets base starting happiness, population unhappiness, and unhappiness per city from HANDICAP_AI_STANDARD
AI gets aiunhappiness, production bonuses, barb bonueses, etc from the player selected handicap
Txurce
Deity
I assume there was a lot of trial and error in the creation of the fake file, since otherwise this is seemingly a simple fix. Did someone mention trying something like this once before?
Txurce
Deity
That's what I imagined, however vaguely. Thanks again for the effort.
Gamewizard
Emperor
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 1,234
Bravo sir! I will try this now in place of AI Equalizer. Thanks for the hard work!
Azazell
Prince
Sneaks --> your mod is compatible with mod History in the making II v3 ??
Txurce
Deity
I started a game with v5 on Immortal. Early AI expansion was normal. France immediately went hostile due to my size, which occasionally happened in v3. What surprised me was how many units they had (warriors, archers, chariots) when they attacked me around 2200 BC. I had just founded a second city (modified NC start) and didn't have a prayer.
Out of curiosity I started over two more times, building a few archers in one game, beelining for horsemen in the other. (France had the same unit make-up in game 2, interestingly no chariots bit one catapult in game 3). In both cases I just didn't have enough units to survive around 2000 BC.
In the process I noticed how well-manned the CS were as well (at least 3 units earlier than 2500 BC). I know you gave them added units to prevent worker theft (I still had a shot at one, but passed it up). I was wondering if this is in addition to the unit-startup boost Thal gave CS recently.
I'll try to play a game through at this point by just cranking out units, to see how things balance for longer than 50-60 turns. But these early results made me wonder just how much of a starting edge the major and minor civs have in units on Immotal, for example.
Out of curiosity I started over two more times, building a few archers in one game, beelining for horsemen in the other. (France had the same unit make-up in game 2, interestingly no chariots bit one catapult in game 3). In both cases I just didn't have enough units to survive around 2000 BC.
In the process I noticed how well-manned the CS were as well (at least 3 units earlier than 2500 BC). I know you gave them added units to prevent worker theft (I still had a shot at one, but passed it up). I was wondering if this is in addition to the unit-startup boost Thal gave CS recently.
I'll try to play a game through at this point by just cranking out units, to see how things balance for longer than 50-60 turns. But these early results made me wonder just how much of a starting edge the major and minor civs have in units on Immotal, for example.
Txurce
Deity
Wow! I actually like them coming to win. And I did learn from my last game (v3, where Japan did the same thing) that an early hostile comment guarantees a coming total war. I'll post one or the other as soon as I look up how to do either.
Txurce
Deity
Here's the save.
Similar threads
