What's the intelligence level on the OT forum?

How smart are the people on this forum?


  • Total voters
    174
kingjoshi said:
You're not smart enough to see its value. That's not their fault. :p

Or maybe they are not smart enough to see that elitism based on an unrealistic tape measure is not smart? And I am and I could join MENSA if the whole idea didn't fill me with derision


I used to think that was funny. For a split second. I'm more of a fan of Yogi Bera type quotes.

It's not funny it's a result of response ^^^

"I'll only be a member of a club that wants me." - me

I join a club based on the same thing, but this rule only applies to elitist nonsense



Reading about Socrates drastically forged my philosophies a decade ago. I think that's one of the smartest things ever said in human history. Besides, "I think therefore I am. I think."

Same here my view of my intelligence is simply that, I am clever enough to realise I truly am stupid

Bold by me .
 
What does being charasmatic have to do with this? :confused:

I would say above average.
 
I think most people who post here are somewhat intellegent and if they arent they are good at hiding it.

We very rarely see flamers and people using leet speak. And most of the people here can have a civilized discussion.
 
Xanikk999 said:
We very rarely see flamers
Flamers are can be intelligent. They just tend to be jerks.

Hell, I'd be a flamer if the mods would let me get away with it.
 
I'm just posting Really Smart Because I've read Cody_The_Genious's posts. He seems really smart, right?:confused:
 
Xanikk999 said:
We very rarely see flamers and people using leet speak.

Y0u m34n l13k th1s f0r ex4mpl3?

Sorry about any pain that caused;) . I voted above average. Whilst I might not agree with many people here about a lot of things (either the left or right wingers, and TBH I disagree with almost all of them when it comes to politics) they can at least come up with arguments to defend their point of view and have good reasons for doing so, unlike many people I know from RL. For me to think someone's "really smart" then they need to do something to really make me think, like understanding 2nd year thermodynamics, or how the way people say things shows what they really think. Not Nobel prize winning stuff, just things that roughly 99% of the population could only understand with a lot of study (I consider myself nowhere near that intelligent).

And as for MENSA, if I'm a genius then there must be some sort of problem with IQ tests in general. All it proves is that I'm good at IQ tests:rolleyes:
 
The misunderstanding about IQ tests is just disappointing. And why must people pile it on to MENSA? :sighs:
 
colony said:
Y0u m34n l13k th1s f0r ex4mpl3?

$0rry @b0u+ @Ny p@iN +h@+ c@u$3d . i v0+3d @b0v3 @v3r@g3. \/\/hi1$+ i mi+3 n0+ @gr33 \/\/i+h m@Ny p30P13 h3r3 @b0u+ @ 10+ 0f +hiNgz (3i+h3r +h3 13Ph+ 0r ri+3 \/\/iNg3rz, @Nd +bh i di$@gr33 \/\/i+h @1M0$+ @11 0f +h3M \/\/h3N i+ c0M3$ +0 p01i+icz) +h3y c@N @+ 13@$+ c0M3 uP \/\/i+h @rguM3N+z +0 d3Ph3Nd +h3ir p0iN+ 0f vi3\/\/ @Nd h@v3 g00d r3@$0Nz ph0r d0iNg $0, uN1i/<3 m@Ny p30P13 i /<N0\/\/ phr0M r1. ph0r m3 +0 +hiN/< $0M30N3z "r3@11y $M@r+" +h3N +h3y n33d +0 d0 $0M3+hiNg +0 r3@11y m@/<3 m3 +hiN/<, 1i/<3 uNd3r$+@NdiNg 2Nd y3@r +h3rM0dyN@Micz, 0r h0\/\/ +h3 \/\/@y p30P13 $@y +hiNgz $h0\/\/z \/\/h@+ +h3y r3@11y +hiN/<. n0+ n0b31 priz3 \/\/iNniNg $+uPh, ju$+ +hiNgz +h@+ r0ugh1y 99% 0f +h3 p0Pu1@+i0N c0u1d 0N1y uNd3r$+@Nd \/\/i+h @ 10+ 0f $+udy (i c0N$id3r my$31Ph n0\/\/h3r3 n3@r +h@+ iN+311ig3N+).

@Nd @z ph0r m3Nz@, iPh i'M @ g3Niu$ +h3N +h3r3 mu$+ b3 $0M3 $0r+ 0f pr0b13M \/\/i+h iq +3$+z iN g3N3r@1. @11 i+ pr0v3$ i$ +h@+ i'M g00d @+ iq +3$+z:rolleyes:
Fixed ;) ...
 
Actually, compared to most forums I visit, and the actual world population, CFC is pretty smart...

...now, could it use a little help in the maturity department, yeah, but then again...it's still ahead of the curve on that one compared to the regular world as well.

So what I'm really trying to say is, CFC = smart The World Around CFC = a bunch of idiots
 
I voted above average. Most of the posters on this board, especially in the OT part of it, are fairly intelligent. Even the guys I don't agree with, like Perfection, aren't stupid, just wrong. Of course there's the occasional troll who is an idiot, but in general the people here are fairly smart, with fair typing skills and grammar. (Perhaps too good, I find myself sometimes playing the grammar nazi on other forums, because I've been spoiled by CFC and a few other select forums) Perhaps Civ just naturally attracts those with a healthy intellect.
 
Above average, and that's in all kinds of intelligence. I bet a lot of people here wouldn't do wonderfully well (likely myself included) on an IQ test, but that's just because they have different kinds of knowledge.

As for me, a tree stump is more intelligent, so I'm bringing y'all down!
 
I voted average. Sure we got our "above average" and our "really smart", but we also have our "below average" and our morons (not in brackets). Hence on average we are... average. Punto
 
Back
Top Bottom