They didn't read the betamapcradle part.
I'm ever so sure that the map is plenty good enough as it is; there is no real need to call it a "beta". You have a hungry crowd now, so get crackin' on the game!

They didn't read the betamapcradle part.
I'm ever so sure that the map is plenty good enough as it is; there is no real need to call it a "beta". You have a hungry crowd now, so get crackin' on the game!![]()
Hmm, I have pondered this for awhile.
My being new I am not old. I just wanted to know if there are any recorded events of a NES game being won by world domination. What are the usual conclusions?
Join a game and be the first!Hmm, I have pondered this for awhile.
My being new I am not old. I just wanted to know if there are any recorded events of a NES game being won by world domination. What are the usual conclusions?
Hmm, I have pondered this for awhile.
My being new I am not old. I just wanted to know if there are any recorded events of a NES game being won by world domination. What are the usual conclusions?
Most of those that have are laughably unrealistic. Then again, I'm an elitist.I've read some bits on the wiki about certain NESes ending in nuclear apocalypse. Somehow that seemed to me to be a likely ending.
Most of those that have are laughably unrealistic. Then again, I'm an elitist.
Two, and actually, the rules got in my way half the time and were remarkably easy to exploit the other half. And I never made a statement on that being realistic or not.You also have dominated the world in more than one NES.
I don't think they can have them. Reality ultimately needs to be imposed by logic and knowledge on the part of the Moderator laying down the law and saying "No;" no rule set will ever do that satisfactorily on its own. The rule sets are basic and could use improvement for sure. However what's genuinely needed are educated, intelligent moderators to use them.It's not his fault that the rules were essentially made to be exploited. There are just no checks on victory in most of our rule sets.
No. I can't. In fact, I am rather irked you'd even ask that. I have stated more times than is necessary my opinion on this: if you're going to call it realistic, it should be realistic; if it's not going to be realistic, don't call it that. Don't act like it's just exceptionally serious or truthful if it's not going to be. Simple as that. Conversely, if somebody actually does present that as their goal, observe it and adhere to it rather than just doing whatever strikes your fancy. If you are C or D-List do not pretend to be A-List. It will be rather apparent you're not. Battlefield Earth is not the epic sci-fi fare of our generation. Only an idiot (or a scientologist, but I repeat myself) would dare pretend it was. Nobody in other genres of entertainment does this--it should not be done here either.Can't we be happy with having somewhat unrealistic, but fun NESes (still far more realistic than civ), while not having people continuously say 'unrealistic'? I don't care if you think it, I just enjoy it more when I don't have to hear things like that.