Ace of Gold
MAKE WAY FOR THE BAD GUY
Your Updates are fine. So are the rules. The only thing I suggest is that you post the whole update instead of slowly adding stuff in the update.
Oh yeah for the map, get the shiny map.
While We Wait: The Next Generation
- Thread starter Turner
- Start date
- Status
Your Updates are fine. So are the rules. The only thing I suggest is that you post the whole update instead of slowly adding stuff in the update.
Oh yeah for the map, get the shiny map.
Terrance888
Discord Reigns
Yeah. Adrogans also did one.
I will join one if I had the time... which I probably will have in a few weeks.
I will join one if I had the time... which I probably will have in a few weeks.
Moderator Action: Warned for spam. Please keep off topic discussion to the off topic forum.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Moderator Action: Warned for spam. Please keep off topic discussion to the off topic forum.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Lurker's Comment: Yes, I know, that's why I was sad. I wanted to dominate Asia as Japan.
Brought Over from Warhead's new NES.
So, Lightfang, what exactly was wrong with my NES?
The moderator.
Yes, and sp is asking what he did wrong.
I wanted to finish mine, but after losing two updates in row to unforeseeable circumstances (thefts and random frying of computers), it caused me to think the NES was basically cursed and drop it. I really didn't want it to happen, because I loved that time line, though it did allow me to drop NESing for about 5 months and get my life back on track.
Abaddon
Deity
Im sure if you revived it, people would join. Heck people wanted to play that timeline so much they joined SP's NES.
SP, the one thing you lack is staying power. I know any NES you propose will die after two or three updates because you lose interest. Stick with one idea, for 10+ updates and people might start to take you seriously
SP, the one thing you lack is staying power. I know any NES you propose will die after two or three updates because you lose interest. Stick with one idea, for 10+ updates and people might start to take you seriously
carmen510
Deity
sp is the total opposite of me, I have a timeline which very few people like (See CarmenNES03: Kaiserreich, but I have way too much staying power.
(See CarmenNES01: Space Colonization)
Abaddon
Deity
I know! I wish you would run a NES with a more traditional ruleset.
You update well, you keep top of stats etc. Its just a shame you pick timelines few are interested in, combined with rulesets I dislike!
You update well, you keep top of stats etc. Its just a shame you pick timelines few are interested in, combined with rulesets I dislike!
carmen510
Deity
Then what rulesets DO you like? Since a lot of people seem to like EQ's system. 
Although I also like Jason's system.
Although I also like Jason's system.
Then what rulesets DO you like? Since a lot of people seem to like EQ's system.
I personally don't.
Out of curiousity and my desire to improve and change things around, what are the problems you have with whatever is considered "EQ's system?"
My main problem is the presence of a tech tree that doesn't necessarily work in Real Life (with a few exceptions, people are the ones making discoveries, not nations). In addition, while the division of IC (or whatever you want to call it) does make sense to some extent, it doesn't really work with the small resolution in terms of allocation. If I had 1 IC (as would be the case with many smaller countries), I would be forced to put 100% in one category, which defeats the purpose of it as well as requiring the continual switching of where to spend. I feel like it's unnecessary complexity.
Abaddon
Deity
Yep, I hate the division of the economy most of all. I jsut don't understand it. If i'm the government, money is money, I should be able to spend it on whatever I wish. Also with so much laid out (tech tree, economic growth rate, units) I feel the Mod controls the game too much. I said as much in my last orders I sent you.
Other than starting a war, there was nothing much my nation could do for about 15 updates!
Other than starting a war, there was nothing much my nation could do for about 15 updates!
I feel the same way about the tech tree actually. Been working on a new way to work it out, probably the end result will be total elimination of research from the style to be replaced by randomness based on the nation's economic stature as a nation (i.e. an invention is more likely to take place in 1840 in Britain than say, Afghanistan). But the change from TWTUD to ABNW which made private do research rather than military seemed to solve most of that problem, as it represented the nation's people researching that particular field rather than the government.
As for the 1 IC, that's a good point. I'll definitely have to think on that. The ruleset I made for TWTUD II was supposed to solve the little nation problem, but the formulas didn't quite work out right. The complexity of that ruleset in general is an extreme difficulty.
As for the 1 IC, that's a good point. I'll definitely have to think on that. The ruleset I made for TWTUD II was supposed to solve the little nation problem, but the formulas didn't quite work out right. The complexity of that ruleset in general is an extreme difficulty.
- Status
Similar threads
