Moderator Action: Back on topic please.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
Lord_Iggy said:Hmm... what is it exactly that you are proposing? What would happen if two mods infamous for overextending themselves tried working together?
I'm interested.
Originally Posted by Luckymoose
lurker's comment: It is rather absurd, if you are seriously planning to update it usually comes out in a day max.
OPEN LETTER ABOUT WWW THREAD
I know spam is bad, and there is a whole OT forum, but it seems we've swung to the other extreme and now people are scared to post here. From 5+ pages a day, to 0.
For 'global' users of civfanatics I can see the appeal of OT. But I choose to spend my very limited internet time on the NES forum, and I value the opinions and comments of people here, particularly given the calmer and more intellectual mood here. I don't necessarily want to post things in OT.
Is there any chance of going halfway with the restrictions? Allowing the unusual NES forum its own thread where moods and feelings of this unusual community can be expressed in controlled amounts of 'spam'?
You know, pretty soon I'm just going to put out a record composed only of the words "Hypocrisy equals Bad" for this several people in this forum.
OPEN LETTER ABOUT WWW THREAD
I know spam is bad, and there is a whole OT forum, but it seems we've swung to the other extreme and now people are scared to post here. From 5+ pages a day, to 0.
For 'global' users of civfanatics I can see the appeal of OT. But I choose to spend my very limited internet time on the NES forum, and I value the opinions and comments of people here, particularly given the calmer and more intellectual mood here. I don't necessarily want to post things in OT.
Is there any chance of going halfway with the restrictions? Allowing the unusual NES forum its own thread where moods and feelings of this unusual community can be expressed in controlled amounts of 'spam'?
While I don't have much sentiment to post in this thread personally, I agree with this. A particular forum may have a particular purpose, but if it can be adapted to several purposes it (as a rule) should.
This topic has been discussed in the mod forum and the sentiment there is that OT needs to be in the OT forum. Giving NESing its own special OT platform is seen as elitist and out of character with TF's philosophy. I do not forsee that changing any time soon.Being the coward that I am, I didn't really want to voice out my thoughts on this but yes, I am in full agreement with Daft here.
From my own experience, OT is full of people with either no sense of humour or are just plain wacked. The original WWW threads were a safe place for NESers to bash each other, talk trash and other things within our own community without getting mired in the whole "Creation vs. Evolution", "Obama vs. McCain", "this vs. that" rubbish which seems to fill up all the threads in OT. That place is knee-deep in Hatorade.
A relaxation on the restrictions would definitely be ideal. That my first spam warning in the five years I've been on this forum came from the new WWW thread does make it seem a bit... sad.
Posted by Luckymoose
I said seriously considering updating. When I don't seriously consider it, I don't do it
Given how many people are logged on at the moment, it's suprising how few posts there are...
We're discussing overall posts, rather than posts AT THIS VERY MOMENT.
Turner said:If you feel the need to spam/post off topic, we have an entire subforum provided for just such posting. Use it. Spamming this thread, or for that matter other NES threads, will be dealt with.
flyingchicken said:Fun fact: I have a hard-on for clear and expressive writing.