Bamspeedy
CheeseBob
Just shifting the parking enforcement budget to another department is reducing 'police' funding, but not really changing anything.
But for most people it means reduce spending on police departments: fewer cops, fewer programs. It is a terrible slogan. "Fund Law Enforcement!" would be better.
Certainly could be part of it.Triple the training? As in, police officers in the US have the shortest amount of training in the OECD sphere, before being let onto the streets.
Triple the training? As in, police officers in the US have the shortest amount of training in the OECD sphere, before being let onto the streets.
The point is that the tasks that should be handled by say mental health profesionals is currently being handled by police. So while there SHOULD not be overlap between these roles there currently is, and "defund the police" is one solution to that.
I agree 100% w bird, it's a slogan guaranteed to be inflammatory and invite misinterpretation and backlash.But for most people it means reduce spending on police departments: fewer cops, fewer programs. It is a terrible slogan. "Fund Law Enforcement!" would be better.
I didn't realise being a Bernie supporter was inherently a positive qualifier in terms of Democratic leadership candidacy. Didn't a bunch of them then go and vote for Trump?joe rogan should run, he was a berniebro
that would cause some partisan heads to explode
That makes sense it was written by a bunch of 20-somethings. Who cares, people don't understand beyond a student union anyway. The bill is all the good things, like straight up feasible and Utopian like everything good we were doing mid century for the new millennium.Well, I just read it and it strikes me as more like something a student union would produce to show willing than an honest and productive solution from the most powerful people in the world to humanities most pressing problem. Whether anything more useful would have been possible is another question I guess.
After 2016 I don't think people care much about qualifications. 2024 president could be some currently unknown person who blows up on Twitter over the next two years.He's not qualified.
Not try to overthrow democracy?'Qualified' people have gotten what done exactly?
If a large number of working class voters find populist candidates more appealing than establishment candidates regardless of partisan affiliation, shouldn't that be an opportunity rather than a problem? If Rogan is the guy who could bring in these voters- and I'm not pretending that he is, I'm not insane, but let's entertain the hypothetical- then couldn't the potential merits of a candidacy be reasonably explored?I didn't realise being a Bernie supporter was inherently a positive qualifier in terms of Democratic leadership candidacy. Didn't a bunch of them then go and vote for Trump?
I care. But I do agree, not everyone has to be an insider. I was considering Yang last time around (I won't be going forward), and generally speaking, in Ocasio-Cortez's case, people don't consider members of the House.After 2016 I don't think people care much about qualifications. 2024 president could be some currently unknown person who blows up on Twitter over the next two years.
'Qualified' people have gotten what done exactly?
Can't find it on YouTube but there's a compilation every US president I think since Carter talking about environment/climate change and their ambitious plan as emissions continue to rise and every middle aged lady drives an SUV cause it makes her feel 'safer'.
I'm not suggesting Rogan for president, he's a bit too easily influenced for my taste but I'm not too fussed about needing a 'career politician'.
But for most people it means reduce spending on police departments: fewer cops, fewer programs. It is a terrible slogan. "Fund Law Enforcement!" would be better.
I didn't realise being a Bernie supporter was inherently a positive qualifier in terms of Democratic leadership candidacy. Didn't a bunch of them then go and vote for Trump?
Of course, given that Sanders himself didn't get the nomination, I don't see the Democrat Party aligning themselves behind Rogan, as much as Berzerker thinks it would be some kind of massive own.
It's the stupidest slogan in the history of slogans.I agree 100% w bird, it's a slogan guaranteed to be inflammatory and invite misinterpretation and backlash.