Sims2789
Fool me once...
There's two reasons: Personal freedom and public health & safety.
The first reason's simple: Everyone knows smoking's bad for you (packs even say it on the side), but as long as you don't do it in a bar, in a car with a kid inside, etc. ("forcing" me to inhale one puff on the sidewalk as I pass by doesn't count) then you shouldn't be stopped from doing it. In short, as long as it doesn't hurt other people you're free to do it regardless of how it affects you.
That being said, I support regulating addictive substances like nicotine similar to how we regulate food, if we can do it and not add insult to injury to existing smokers, who would be forced to smoke more if we flat-out require cigarette manufacturers to lower nicotine content. I don't think letting existing smokers buy higher-nicotine cigarettes would work, so I don't know how to implement this.
However, the second reason's more complex: Smoking would be pushed underground, and it may actually decrease since it would be less accessible. However, organized crime would take it over, and they'd wage turf wars, smuggle drugs, and manufacture cigarettes that are even less safe than the ones you buy in stores.
On top of that, smoking would once again become a badge of rebellion for young people, and its use among young people may increase permanently, like it did briefly in the 1990's before dropping to a 12-year low in 2003 (link).
EDIT: Could a mod add "Yes, from somewhere else" and "No, from somewhere else" to the poll?
The first reason's simple: Everyone knows smoking's bad for you (packs even say it on the side), but as long as you don't do it in a bar, in a car with a kid inside, etc. ("forcing" me to inhale one puff on the sidewalk as I pass by doesn't count) then you shouldn't be stopped from doing it. In short, as long as it doesn't hurt other people you're free to do it regardless of how it affects you.
That being said, I support regulating addictive substances like nicotine similar to how we regulate food, if we can do it and not add insult to injury to existing smokers, who would be forced to smoke more if we flat-out require cigarette manufacturers to lower nicotine content. I don't think letting existing smokers buy higher-nicotine cigarettes would work, so I don't know how to implement this.
However, the second reason's more complex: Smoking would be pushed underground, and it may actually decrease since it would be less accessible. However, organized crime would take it over, and they'd wage turf wars, smuggle drugs, and manufacture cigarettes that are even less safe than the ones you buy in stores.
On top of that, smoking would once again become a badge of rebellion for young people, and its use among young people may increase permanently, like it did briefly in the 1990's before dropping to a 12-year low in 2003 (link).
EDIT: Could a mod add "Yes, from somewhere else" and "No, from somewhere else" to the poll?