WI Obama was administered a drug which caused cataclysmic penis issues

Status
Not open for further replies.

RedRalph

Deity
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
20,708
Now I know sometimes I post these threads and we all have a good laugh at my ignorance of the legal system of the USA, but this time I'm deadly serious, and if anyone treats this as a joke thread I'll be very, very angry.

Imagine the following: The US presidential salary is not as high as you might imagine, so after a binge of buying sweets and stuff Obama is skint. He looks up the 'want ads' and sees and advertisement whereby a team of scientists will pay people to allow medical experiments to be conducted upon them. He goes to the test centre (in the beltway) and the scientists strap him on to a cold metal table. After a brief conversation with the main scientist, Obama is violently injected with a serum which causes him to black out. When he wakes up, his penis has grown to serveral dozen metres long. From now on he needs to strap it around his body to get by, and he looks a bit like he's in a penis-cocoon. anyway, at a conference with Hu Jintao, he sees an attractive serving-girl and gets a sex erection. His dickle knock a waiter over, causing him to spill scalding pale green soup over Obama's gentleman.

So from then on the whole world is aware that Barrack Hussein Obama has a huge but scalded penis, making him the ridicule object of the diplomatic community. Wikileak cables reveal that America's enemies are planning to attack because they don't believe in the deterrence credibility's of a POTUS with such appalling penis wounds,

So my question is thus: would the House of Representititves or Congress legally be allowed impeach him on the basis that his penis was too badly wounded to fulfill the duties of his office?

Now don't treat me like a moron. I asked this because I want legal and political advice. Not some crazy kid laughing as if everything is a joke.
 
Oh I left out one importatn detail: when BHO's sex organ got burnt he let out a roar.
 
This thread makes me feel ways.

I'm not actually sure what to say.
 
Every president breaks the law, so it would merely be a formality to remove him under those pretenses. The president can be impeached and removed for "treason, bribery, high crimes or misdemeanors," but these are not explicitly defined, thus Congress can more or less decide what constitutes the above. I'm of the mind that maybe we shouldn't wait for Obama's inflationary procedure.
 
i think the only logical conclusion would be for the cia to organize an international summit about the state of the world's pheasant population in chicago, inviting every head of state in the world.

they would then proceed to make a soup mainly consisting of that serum, (which would later be infamously known as "the chicago massive penis soup" in chinese), serving it to everyone, thus getting all world leaders back on equal footing in one ingenious strike.
 
When this happened to me, my employers weren't allowed to fire me due to anti-discrimination legislation, so I'd guess the same would be the same here as well. Albeit I live in the UK not the US, but the job I held was considerably effected by it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom