- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 9,308
Hrmm, if she made more I'd be okay with it, even it was significantly more, as long as I was doing something with my life that resulted in me feeling pride beyond just how big my paycheck is. I wouldn't be able to tolerate being a freeloader, it would make me feel worthless and wreck my already fragile self esteem.
I like this answer. Well put. That covers the "I earn less" case.
For the "I earn more" case, I think it would be comparable. I'd want her to have an income and feel that she was doing something worthwhile in life. In fact, I'd actually consider it a red flag if she wasn't earning enough to live comfortably on her own and would be dependent on my income. So I guess I am saying I wouldn't date someone who was unemployed without future prospects, but I wouldn't rule out a billionaire right away. That does still leave a good amount of room where should could be earning less than me, but still plenty enough to not be a red flag, though.
As for intelligence. There's definitely a lower boundary - if I can't have intelligent conversations with her, it's not going to work long-term. She wouldn't have to be as smart as me, but comparable and able to win arguments is necessary. I don't think being more intelligent than me would be a negative. I can see where always losing arguments could be demoralizing, so perhaps someone way out of my league intelligence-wise would be problematic, but usually I find high intelligence to be attractive. I suspect the higher boundary, if it exists, would be much further off than the low one.
By "arguments" I mean like logical, philosophical, and political arguments, not fighting.