1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Would you support US military involvement in any of the following?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Mojotronica, Mar 24, 2003.

?

Would you support US military involvement in any of the following?

  1. Iran

    17 vote(s)
    43.6%
  2. North Korea

    29 vote(s)
    74.4%
  3. Chechnya

    11 vote(s)
    28.2%
  4. Cuba

    15 vote(s)
    38.5%
  5. Palestinians in the West Bank

    16 vote(s)
    41.0%
  6. Libya

    14 vote(s)
    35.9%
  7. Somalia

    16 vote(s)
    41.0%
  8. Columbia

    15 vote(s)
    38.5%
  9. Rwanda

    17 vote(s)
    43.6%
  10. Pakistan

    8 vote(s)
    20.5%
  11. Indonesia

    9 vote(s)
    23.1%
  12. Kenya

    9 vote(s)
    23.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Zcylen

    Zcylen Moonlight Rambler

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    2,031
    Location:
    Monterrey, Mexico
    UN :rolleyes:

    Koffi Anan is like a bike...any stupid can handle with it.
     
  2. Ohwell

    Ohwell Deity

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    5,586
    Location:
    Bringing enlightenment to you
    I support no US military involvement in any of the choices listed.

    You must be joking about Colombia; it's a US puppet state, for heavens sake.
     
  3. Free Enterprise

    Free Enterprise The return stroke.

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,608
    Location:
    S.C., 1 of the 50, U.S.A.
    Your trolling is getting old and their are other countries which are invovled in the action so are they conquers too? Anyways do you really think Iraq is doing well? They are losing far more troops than the Coalition forces.

    I would support fighting on the side of Israel if they were attacked(by a substantial military force and I doubt anyone other country would help them other than the U.S.). Other then that no more military action is needed after Iraq, especially not Checnya(Russian double standard).

    North Korea is not going to be attacked by the U.S. There is a most a 1.5% of that happening.
     
  4. Peri

    Peri Vote early and vote often

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,261
    I have read that post of Curt's you quoted 3 times now. How on earth can you say that was a troll?

    Popular American opion did expect this to be like a video game on set on easy. I think the current reactions of people there prove this
     
  5. Pongui

    Pongui Deity

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,342
    No organization or government has direct power. Laws must be upheld by the members or citizens (e.g. police), not leaders or committees that make the laws. President Calvin Coolidge had no "real" control over Al Capone, for example - it was up to police and ordinary citizens to control him (they didn't). Kofi Annan has no power over the US, a Member State of the UN - its up to other Member States to control the US, or any other country.

    Sure, the UN is powerless, but it still has total overriding authority.
     
  6. Case

    Case The horror, the horror

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2000
    Messages:
    1,884
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    What's going on in Kenya? AFAIK, they recently got rid of their corrupt government, and have replaced it with a democratically elected promising looking new government.

    Did you get it mixed up with Zimbabwe? Now that's a country which would benefit from some kind of international intervention.
     
  7. Sh3kel

    Sh3kel Emperor

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,649
    Location:
    Israel
    The Iraqis ARE being a cakewalk. The US army advnaced within artillery range of Iraq's capital within 5 days of fighting and with the least ammount of losses to enemy fire in the history of modern warfare. It's supposed to be a war, which means people from both sides are going to get killed, but the fact the Iraqis are putting up token resistance doesn't mean in the whole scheme of things they are not a worthy adversary.

    War, as any other violent conflict, will result in people getting killed. Lossess are horrible regardless of how small they may be, but from a military point of view, the American-British coalition in Iraq is advancing insanely fast for insanely low prices.
     
  8. CurtSibling

    CurtSibling ENEMY ACE™ SLeague Staff Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,422
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Innsmouth
    I wan't trolling, chum.

    So stop whining.

    Notice how the word conquest is in quotes, or is that too subtle for you?
     
  9. CurtSibling

    CurtSibling ENEMY ACE™ SLeague Staff Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,422
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Innsmouth
    It's my country that is the major ally in this fight, so when the Israeli army chooses to help out, then you can cast judgements.
     
  10. Azale

    Azale Deity

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Messages:
    18,723
    Location:
    Texas
    The Israeli army has their own problems to worry about.


    Total overriding authority on what? The U.N has no power to do anything if a nation decides not to listen to them, the U.N itself cannot do anything. The U.N, in my opinion, is nothing but a big debate forum. A seperate country could force the other country to listen to the U.N., but not the U.N itself. If you mean, it has world opinion behind it, how do you embargo China, the U.S, U.K,Russia,etc. And you surely can't invade them.
     
  11. Sh3kel

    Sh3kel Emperor

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,649
    Location:
    Israel
    CurtSibling, the only reason the Israeli army is out of this war is because the Americans and the British government asked us to stay out. I'm not casting judgements, merely statement facts.
    As far as armed conflicts go, this one is pretty light on the casulaty side.
     
  12. CurtSibling

    CurtSibling ENEMY ACE™ SLeague Staff Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,422
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Innsmouth
    I am not contesting that fact. :cool:
     
  13. Richard III

    Richard III Duke of Gloucester

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2001
    Messages:
    4,872
    Location:
    bla
    Well, it depends, obviously.
     
  14. phoenix_night

    phoenix_night Deity

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    none.



    cuba rules.
     
  15. amadeus

    amadeus As seen on OT

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    33,964
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Osaka (大阪)
    Cuba rules? Just can't get enough of being imprisoned and beaten, eh?

    With respect to the question, I don't think we need to committ any of our forces to any of those countries at this time.
     
  16. WonderStuFF

    WonderStuFF Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Sunderland - UK
    I support none.
    Although this current war is not going badly it hasn't exactly gone to plan.The Iraqi's are firing back for a start.
    In the event of hostility against Israel they are well capable of taking care of any troubles on their own.
    It's only taken a week for people to become uneasy about events in Iraq.I'am of the opinion that public support would wane quickly in a long haul scenario.
    North Korea is not a pushover nation.An invasion there would precipitate a bloodbath not seen since WW2.
    As for the others i dont see the need.
    WS~
     
  17. G-Man

    G-Man A One Man's War

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2001
    Messages:
    7,703
    Location:
    HUJI, Israel
    Iran, N Korea, Lybia, Cuba. Palestinians are a problem Israel can handle militarily, and I don't see how a bigger military force will help against their terrorists. Pakistan has nuclear weapons and I wouldn't support a war that could evolve using nukes. As to the rest of the countries - I don't know of any significant links to terrorism (which ofcource doesn't mean there aren't known ones - I know very little about most of them :( )

    However, I would generally support most actions to replace a dictatorship with a democracy, not necessarily military means. I also encourage the US to put pressure on allied dictatorships and monarchies to give parlaments a bigger role and to slow democraticize them.
     
  18. CrackedCrystal

    CrackedCrystal Where am I?

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,007
    :rotfl:

    Two words: National Sovereignty

    Even if I was willing to give that up to another power, it would not be the UN. Have you read their charter? You have human rights only if it does not interfere with the goals of the UN. At least the US constituion states you have them regardless of what the US wants to do.
     
  19. WonderStuFF

    WonderStuFF Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Sunderland - UK
    If there is further military action after this conflict then i see it more in the way of special forces targetting known terror groups.
    Putting pressure on European countries in regard to what is essentially their way of life is dangerous and will not do much for support in any future conflict.
    Europe is a can of worms best left closed.
    WS~
     
  20. Gastric ReFlux

    Gastric ReFlux Dispatch our Tech Staff

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    717
    Interesting. It seems you don't want to surrender it to the UN, I have no complaints with that.

    Would you prefer to surrender it to another nation that decides you are criminal?
     

Share This Page