80s Crack Baby Scare Apparently Overblown?

Formaldehyde

Both Fair And Balanced
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
33,999
Location
USA #1
"Crack babies" study finds little proof of long-term health woes

CHICAGO The "crack babies" scare of the 1980s may have been overblown, a new study suggests.

A new review published May 27 in Pediatrics finds little proof of any major long-term ill effects in children whose mothers used cocaine during pregnancy.

Widespread use of crack cocaine in the 1980s led to the "crack baby" scare, when babies born to crack users sometimes had worrisome symptoms including jitteriness and smaller heads. Studies at the time blamed prenatal drug use, suggested affected children had irreversible brain damage and predicted dire futures for them. These reports led to widespread media coverage featuring breathless headlines and heart-rending images of tiny sick newborns hooked up to hospital machines.

While some studies researchers looked at for the new review linked pregnant women's cocaine use with children's behavior difficulties, attention problems, anxiety and worse school performance, the effects were mostly small and may have resulted from other factors including family problems or violence, parents' continued drug use and poverty, the researchers said.

For the review, led by University of Maryland pediatrics researcher Dr. Maureen Black, researchers looked at 27 earlier studies involving more than 5,000 11- to 17-year-olds whose mothers had used cocaine while pregnant. The studies all involved low-income, mostly black and urban families.

In some of the studies, crack-exposed teens had lower scores on developmental tests than other children but their scores were still within normal limits. Many studies found that the children's family environment or violence were directly related to the teen's performance regardless of whether their mothers had used cocaine during pregnancy, the researchers said. Studies that tracked children beyond infancy failed to find any severe outcomes.

"The field of prenatal cocaine exposure has advanced significantly since the misleading 'crack baby' scare of the 1980s," the review authors said.

In recent years experts have mostly discounted any link, noting that so-called crack babies often were born prematurely, which could account for many of their early symptoms.

The government's National Institute on Drug Abuse notes that it's tough to evaluate how drug use during pregnancy affects children's development because so many other factors play a role, including prenatal care, mothers' health and family environment.

The March of Dimes estimates that about 4 percent of pregnant women use illicit drugs like cocaine, marijuana and amphetamines. The organization also adds pregnant women who use illicit drugs are also more likely to use alcohol and tobacco, which also pose health risks to an unborn baby.
Is it really possible that during the height of the so-called drug war that many people jumped to conclusions with no real evidence?
 
Is it really possible that during the height of the so-called drug war that many people jumped to conclusions with no real evidence?

Short answer: Yes.

And I doubt it is only limited to drugs.
 
Yeah, it's still not like crack is a neonatal vitamin here.
 
Why did I look at the comments?

Anyway, why the hell isn't this on PubMed? Is this study not funded by government money?
 
I wonder what effect this misinformation had on abortions. A woman who aborted a pregnancy over concerns of potential effects that later proved to be far less likely could be quite distressed by this news.
 
So is crack better or worse than tobacco for fetuses?

Tobacco isn't good but it's not that bad. You betcha with the public smoking bans and whatnot if you could construct an argument that science would uphold there would be shrieking about killing other people's babies anytime somebodies 2nd or 3rd or 4th hand smoke might conceivably be encountered by a pregnant person. The science currently seems to be fairly set in statistically significant but very very minor increases in low birth weight and SIDs associated with mothers who smoke tobacco during pregnancy. Alcohol, despite all the back and forth about if it's ok to have a glass of wine or not, still is coming down as magnitudes more risky. I don't know about pot or most of the other illegal and prescriptions drugs that are commonly abused. You'd probably have to take them all individually. Pot probably also isn't great though as the more research I read that comes out does tend to indicate that developing brains getting stoned isn't particularly helpful for them.
 
So is crack better or worse than tobacco for fetuses?

"Better" based on the volume of smoke - the primary culprit - but a canadian study from the 90s claimed the effects were similar and alcohol was the worst. I suspect the main difference being booze is a depressant while cocaine and tobacco are mild to moderate stimulants - hence the jittery crack babies. Mommies drinking coffee and breast feeding will have a similar effect.
 
Back
Top Bottom