Tough question. Guns can help, say, if someone has a knife and is about to slit someones throat. But accidents with a knife won't be as bad as with guns. Plus, in this scenario, there are still the big guns out there, and the only means by which to combat them would be to get some of your own, which is kinda hard, or run at them with swords. That, mind you, only works in civ. So I can't be sure, I don't love guns, but they have uses too. Tough world eh?
I have a hunch that if personal guns were gone then the people with the big weapons would be overpowering so if you had a tank or a chopper you could screw everything up.
So, I want guns to stay to prevent arseholes with tanks killing me.
Question: Would this affect bazookas or other shoulder mounted anti-armor weapons?
Perhaps he means the government? I don't have much of a fear of other people having guns as I do with the government having a monopoly over the firepower in this nation.
Perhaps he means the government? I don't have much of a fear of other people having guns as I do with the government having a monopoly over the firepower in this nation.
That would make more sense, though when you get down to it, I can't really trust anyone to have superior firepower over me, or even myself. The power, it corrupts!
That would make more sense, though when you get down to it, I can't really trust anyone to have superior firepower over me, or even myself. The power, it corrupts!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.