Formaldehyde
Both Fair And Balanced
The second front page story of the Tampa Bay Times had the subject bar of this thread as the headline this morning, but it now has a different one online. The article was prompted by an incident which has resulted in Danielle Maudley being in a vegetative state since September from striking her head on the road after being tasered. She was fleeing police captivity under highly dubious circumstances, and the highway patrolman was right behind her at the time he used the taser.
This video was captured by a cruiser double-parked right outside the substation.
Link to video.
Experts say trooper's use of Taser on woman raises questions
The paper yesterday had an article detailing why the highway patrolman was cleared of all charges in this incident as well as some additional information not in the first story:
FHP trooper cleared in use of Taser, which put woman in vegetative state
Do you think it is time to "fire the taser", or at least adopt far more stringent guidelines about when it can be used by law enforcement? I don't know of any other country besides the US which allows it to be used under so many circumstances, at least by a number of police departments.
Do you think the highway patrolman should have at least been reprimanded for not properly restraining her?

This video was captured by a cruiser double-parked right outside the substation.
Link to video.
Experts say trooper's use of Taser on woman raises questions
There are additional details in the article, including more expert comments regarding both sides of this matter.When the Taser's prongs hit her back, Danielle Maudsley spun backward and smacked her head on the pavement.
A nearby dashcam recorded the fall, even capturing the sound of her head cracking on the asphalt.
Maudsley, 20, clutched her head and struggled to rise. "I can't get up," she moaned, her final words.
Then she went still.
She has been in a vegetative state ever since. Doctors have told her family she likely will never wake up.
This week, two state agencies cleared Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Daniel Cole of any wrongdoing in the September incident, which occurred as Maudsley tried to escape from an FHP station in Pinellas Park.
But several experts and researchers who reviewed reports and video of the incident said the case raises questions.
They are troubled that Cole tasered Maudsley, a suspect in two hit-and-run crashes who had drugs in her system, while she was handcuffed. They also noted that Cole was just steps behind Maudsley when he fired the Taser.
"It just doesn't make any sense," said Greg Connor, a professor at the University of Illinois Police Training Institute who specializes in use of force. "I don't see where it's going to be that hard to apprehend her."
Cole, who at 267 pounds weighed about three times as much as Maudsley, told investigators he used his Taser because he was concerned one or both of them would be injured if he tackled her. He worried she was headed toward heavy traffic on U.S. 19.
The scrutiny of the Maudsley case comes amid calls from some national groups for police agencies to take a closer look at how and when they use Tasers.
The human rights organization Amnesty International called this week for stricter limits on Taser use after an intoxicated Georgia man died hours after police shot him with one. The group believes there should be a national policy on Taser use.
Florida has had 65 Taser-related deaths since 2001, the second highest total behind California, which had 92.
Amnesty also noted policies regarding the devices vary widely. Some agencies caution heavily about their use, while others consider them a compliance device on the same level as pepper spray.
"Some departments use it the first thing, some departments use it only for the highest level of resistance," said Gene Paoline, associate professor of criminology at the University of Central Florida, who has studied injuries from Tasers. "Unfortunately there's not a standard use of force policy for anything less than deadly force. There's not a national standard for when you should use a Taser and when you should not use it."
FHP policy allows troopers to use Tasers when it "reasonably appears necessary to control non-compliant individuals who have escalated their level of resistance from passive physical resistance to active physical resistance (i.e.: bracing, tensing, pushing, or pulling)."
The policy goes on to say it must be apparent the detained person has the ability to physically threaten others or is trying to flee or escape. It also notes that Tasers shouldn't be used on someone who is handcuffed, but says there still could be times when even that is justifiable.
"The Florida Department of Law Enforcement conducted an independent review," Sgt. Steve Gaskins, a spokesman, said Friday. "FDLE's investigation found the trooper's actions were legal and within the scope of his duties."
The paper yesterday had an article detailing why the highway patrolman was cleared of all charges in this incident as well as some additional information not in the first story:
FHP trooper cleared in use of Taser, which put woman in vegetative state
Do you think it is time to "fire the taser", or at least adopt far more stringent guidelines about when it can be used by law enforcement? I don't know of any other country besides the US which allows it to be used under so many circumstances, at least by a number of police departments.
Do you think the highway patrolman should have at least been reprimanded for not properly restraining her?