Firstly, some background. Three unions representing pilots, engineers and customer services staff of Australia's national airline Qantas have been in conflict with the company's CEOs and management over pay for several months. The dispute had already been running for a while when in August the airline announced plans to outsource jobs to Asia. The unions responded with strikes that forced some flights to be delayed or cancelled. Both sides engaged in increasingly bitter PR offensives that included in-flight announcements, allegations of death threats, and counter-allegations of death threats falsification.
And now, we have this:
The response from the unions was predictable.
I despair for this country sometimes.
So, CFCers, sensible decision? Y/N? I'm interested to hear from fellow Australians in particular. I haven't been keeping up to date on the news lately so maybe they can shed some new light on this issue.
More generally, is there a point where either a company or a union goes too far in an industrial dispute?
And now, we have this:
Qantas grounds all flights
October 29, 2011 - 8:47PM
Qantas will lock out all its employees covered by the agreements that are currently in dispute.
And it has grounded its entire domestic and international fleets indefinitely.
"We are locking out until the unions withdraw their extreme claim and reach agreement with us," Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce told a press conference today.
"This course of action has been forced upon us ... by the actions of three unions," Mr Joyce said.
"The ball is in their court. They have to decide how badly they want to hurt Qantas."
Mr Joyce said his hand had been tipped by the impossible demands of the three unions.
"They are trashing our strategy and our brand," he said.
"They are deliberately destabilising the company and there is no end in sight."
If the industrial action continued, Qantas would have no choice but to shut down its business "part by part", the chief executive said.
He believed the lock out and grounding of the fleet was the only effective avenue at his disposal to bring about a solution to the dispute.
Mr Joyce said he was sorry the course of action had become necessary but the ball was now in the unions' court.
"They must decide just how badly they want to hurt Qantas, their members ... and the travelling public," he said.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/travel/tra...all-flights-20111029-1mpao.html#ixzz1cAq2pXu8
The response from the unions was predictable.
Qantas CEO has 'gone mad' say pilots
October 30, 2011 - 7:35PM
Qantas' decision to ground the entire Qantas fleet is "holding a knife to the nation's throat" and CEO Alan Joyce has "gone mad", the Australian and International Pilots Association (AIPA) says.
AIPA vice president Richard Woodward said the move was "premeditated, unnecessary and grossly irresponsible".
"Alan Joyce is holding a knife to the nation's throat," Captain Woodward said.
"No-one predicted this, because no one thought Alan Joyce was completely mad.
"This is a stunning overreaction. It is straight-up blackmail.
"I knew he was trying to kill Qantas, but I didn't know he wanted to do it this quickly.
"This is a grave and serious situation and the board should move to sack Mr Joyce immediately. This is the saddest day of my 25 years with Qantas."
He said AIPA's industrial action has been limited to making brief, positive in-flight announcements and wearing red ties.
"In response to this, Mr Joyce has now locked out every pilot working for Qantas. This is nothing short of crazy behaviour," he said.
"Mr Joyce is stranding thousands of Qantas passengers all across the globe so he can engage in his mad game of one-upmanship. All so he can pursue his delusion that Qantas should be an Asian airline, instead of an Australian one.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/travel/tra...-say-pilots-20111029-1mpkp.html#ixzz1cAqdi5k5
I despair for this country sometimes.
So, CFCers, sensible decision? Y/N? I'm interested to hear from fellow Australians in particular. I haven't been keeping up to date on the news lately so maybe they can shed some new light on this issue.
More generally, is there a point where either a company or a union goes too far in an industrial dispute?