Aaron russo on the 9-11 inside job

Status
Not open for further replies.
All data whether written, recorded, filmed or verbalized must be examined & corroborated thoroughly. Our country is being systematically invested by covert, hostile enemies who seek to strike us by surprise and we need the help of everyone loyal to the Bill of Rights.

Yeah that's nice and all, but my point about the politeness of posting videos without a summary or transcript on a forum like this stands.
 
Oh alright if you insist....it would be nice if people were to examine the data provided, yes.

Well for someone looking to get people to listen to you you do an awful lot of demanding while not giving anybody a whole lot of reasons to pay attention. I'm already skeptical from the start and putting all your text in unreadable purple font and copypasta'ing 2000 word articles and hours-long youtube videos without any preface or explanation for why I should pay attention doesn't really make me any more interested in listening. I imagine other posters on here would say likewise.
 
I knew it would turn out zee joos were involved somehow.
So were the British, Americans and Saudis. Whats your point?
 
So? To name just a few, 911 is an inside job involving MI6, Mossad, CIA, FBI, FAA, Saudi & Pakistani espionage agencies. So-called, "Moslem hijackers" didnt happen. The jets that impacted the WTC were specialized military drones.

:lol:

Ummm, yeah, sure. Don't forget your meds now.

No, seriously, facts please. Or this didn't happen period. And before I forget we also need some credible motivation.
 
:lol:

Ummm, yeah, sure. Don't forget your meds now.

No, seriously, facts please. Or this didn't happen period. And before I forget we also need some credible motivation.
Buildings who were designed to withstand multiple hits by planes do not fall during one hour after single hit. Thats a fact. For further enquiries do not forget to use your brain...

It's more likely that the Patriots, the Blackhawks and the NBA colluded to fix the MLS cup final last year on the orders of Putin and Aunt Jemima.
And your judgment is based on what? Do you have firsthand knowledge of anything being discussed here? If you look around you will see this world is filled with apparent absurdities happening on daily basis. You are quite certainly aware of that however while some companies are too big too fall similarly some absurdities are too big to be true, right?
 
Buildings who were designed to withstand multiple hits by planes do not fall during one hour after single hit. Thats a fact. For further enquiries do not forget to use your brain...

The buildings collapsed exactly like they were "supposed to" if you follow the laws of physics. It isn't that hard to find proper evidence for the fact that there was nothing odd about what happened. No idea that has been brought up as proof for a conspiracy managed to hold up against even the most basic youtube-answer, much less actual scientific answers.

Someone who believes in absurd conspiracy theories probably shouldn't tell others to "use their brains" either :mischief:


Not that giving the most obvious proof that there is no conspiracy would ever convince a conspiracy theorist. They prefer to ignore everything that doesn't fit into their narrative. That's how certain people can still believe that a man was "murdered by the government after he had surrendered", even though video-evidence and the comments from his own colleagues clearly show otherwise.
 
The buildings collapsed exactly like they were "supposed to" if you follow the laws of physics. It isn't that hard to find proper evidence for the fact that there was nothing odd about what happened. No idea that has been brought up as proof for a conspiracy managed to hold up against even the most basic youtube-answer, much less actual scientific answers.
It was supposed to collaps in free fall like there was no thousand of tons of steel construction below? Was that the way of least resistance for the debris to fall? What laws of physics you are talking about? Go on post the video please...

Someone who believes in absurd conspiracy theories probably shouldn't tell others to "use their brains" either :mischief:
Look buddy, I wouldnt believe that democratic society which is USA suposed to be would have invaded another country such as Iraq on completely false pretext. Who are you to tell me now what is an absurd conspiracy?

Not that giving the most obvious proof that there is no conspiracy would ever convince a conspiracy theorist. They prefer to ignore everything that doesn't fit into their narrative. That's how certain people can still believe that a man was "murdered by the government after he had surrendered", even though video-evidence and the comments from his own colleagues clearly show otherwise.
I am ready to be convinced by evidence, facts and sound reasonings but I am not willing to be fooled by bunch of lies covered as probable and apparent non-absurdities.
 
Someone with "firsthand" knowledge/ Bush goverment insider. See what I mean:

Link to video.

Who are you kidding? Listen to the first hand knowledge:

Link to video.
 
As you yourself show people can say a lot of things. It's also a bit off that you present two people serving under the Bush administration, whom you just discredited based on the Iraq invasion lies.

Now some facts, please. We're still waiting.

Buildings who were designed to withstand multiple hits by planes do not fall during one hour after single hit. Thats a fact. For further enquiries do not forget to use your brain...

Good idea. Here's what my brain came up with: AFAIK the idea of buildings designed to withstand multiple hits by planes only surfaced after 9/11. That apart, the idea of people deliberately flying planes into buildings is statistically much too insignificant to take into consideration when building tall rise.
 
And your judgment is based on what? Do you have firsthand knowledge of anything being discussed here? If you look around you will see this world is filled with apparent absurdities happening on daily basis. You are quite certainly aware of that however while some companies are too big too fall similarly some absurdities are too big to be true, right?

Maybe you missed this, but I was responding to this nonsense:

911 is an inside job involving MI6, Mossad, CIA, FBI, FAA, Saudi & Pakistani espionage agencies. So-called, "Moslem hijackers" didnt happen. The jets that impacted the WTC were specialized military drones.

The scenario I outlined in my post is a lot more likely than the above quote.
 
As you yourself show people can say a lot of things. It's also a bit off that you present two people serving under the Bush administration, whom you just discredited based on the Iraq invasion lies.

Now some facts, please. We're still waiting.



Good idea. Here's what my brain came up with: AFAIK the idea of buildings designed to withstand multiple hits by planes only surfaced after 9/11. That apart, the idea of people deliberately flying planes into buildings is statistically much too insignificant to take into consideration when building tall rise.

My understanding is more that the building was designed to withstand crashes with planes. But this was more in anticipation of pilots losing control of personal aircraft or other small planes that would have been common commercial airliners in the 1970s, not coordinated strikes from larger planes like 767s. And it's also relevant to remember that the planes didn't knock down the towers; it was rather the resulting fire weakening interior steel beams which connected the inner and outer foundational structure causing the outer beams to bow in and collapse the whole tower.
 
As you yourself show people can say a lot of things. It's also a bit off that you present two people serving under the Bush administration, whom you just discredited based on the Iraq invasion lies.

Now some facts, please. We're still waiting.
You need to see the videos to see that neither of the speakers is discredited by oversees action of Bush administration. If you cant do that I cant be of any service to you.

Good idea. Here's what my brain came up with: AFAIK the idea of buildings designed to withstand multiple hits by planes only surfaced after 9/11. That apart, the idea of people deliberately flying planes into buildings is statistically much too insignificant to take into consideration when building tall rise.
I think you should allow your brain to have acces to more informations:
Airplane impact tests conducted by WTC structural engineers during the design of the Twin Towers used the Boeing 707, which was one of the largest passenger jets in the world at the time. The results of the test, carried out early in 1964, calculated that the towers would handle the impact of a 707 traveling at 600 mph without collapsing.

Even though the two Boeing 767 aircraft that were said to be used in the 9/11 attacks were slightly larger than the 707, technical comparisons show that the 707 has more destructive force at cruising speed.
 
The scenario I outlined in my post is a lot more likely than the above quote.
Listen to the FBI chief in the second video I posted and you will see how wrong you are.
 
I only see a video in which an Economist is talking, not an FBI chief.

But.. really? You're one of those people who thinks that Pakistan, Israel, the FAA and whoever else flew military drones into the towers? Whaaaaat....
 
I only see a video in which an Economist is talking, not an FBI chief.

But.. really? You're one of those people who thinks that Pakistan, Israel, the FAA and whoever else flew military drones into the towers? Whaaaaat....

Can you watch this in your country? He says that both MI-6 and Mosad must have known:

Link to video.
 
What happened to flight 77 then? Where'd all the people on that plane go? Why does the wiki page on flight 77 include numerous quotes from witnesses who saw the plane and first responders who saw plane debris? Why does the first video end with the song from Team America World Police?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom