Air Traffic Controller on phone before collision

PlutonianEmpire

King of the Plutonian Empire
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
4,815
Location
MinneSNOWta
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090815/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_mid_air_collision
WASHINGTON – The air traffic controller handling the small plane involved in a deadly crash with a helicopter over the Hudson River was chatting on the telephone about a dead cat at the airport and initially failed to warn the pilot of other aircraft in his path, officials say.

The controller tried unsuccessfully to contact the pilot before the accident, officials said Friday, but the plane collided with a tour helicopter over the Hudson River, killing nine people.

The controller handling the plane and his supervisor at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey at the time of the accident a week ago have been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The National Transportation Safety Board said in a report that the controller, who has not been identified, cleared the single-engine Piper for takeoff at 11:48 and 30 seconds a.m. EDT, then made a telephone call. He remained on the phone, including while further instructing the plane's pilot, until the accident happened.

The phone call, to an airport contractor, was a "silly conversation" concerning a dead cat that had been removed from the airport, a retired union official said, in an account supported by transportation officials also familiar with the contents of the call.

After takeoff, the plane flew southbound until the controller directed it to turn left toward the river, the report said. At 11:52 and 20 seconds, the controller instructed the plane to contact air traffic control at nearby Newark Liberty International Airport, which is part of the procedure for handing off oversight of the small plane.

The pilot apparently did not contact Newark, the report said.

Radar data show there were several aircraft immediately ahead of the plane, including the tour helicopter, "all of which were potential traffic conflicts for the airplane," but the Teterboro controller didn't warn the pilot, the report said.

It wasn't until controllers at the Newark airport alerted the Teterboro controller to the potential collision that he twice tried unsuccessfully to contact the pilot, the report said. The collision occurred at 11:53 and 14 seconds.

At the time the Newark controllers were alerting the Teterboro controller to the danger, they also recommended the plane turn southwest. The plane's pilot apparently overhead that and acknowledged the instruction, the report said.

Video of the crash taken by a tourist sightseeing near the Statute of Liberty show the Piper changing direction seconds before its wing was clipped by the helicopter's rotors. The plane then broke apart in the air and both aircraft plunged into the Hudson.

Union officials representing air traffic controllers said the Teterboro controller couldn't have warned the Piper pilot of the helicopter in its path at the time the plane was directed toward the river. They said the helicopter was just taking off and hadn't appeared on the radar screen yet.

"He was out of communication with the guy by the time the helicopter ever popped up on anybody's radar scope," said Phil Barbarello, National Air Traffic Controllers Association eastern region vice president.

The FAA has said there is no reason to believe the controller's actions contributed to the accident. However, the agency said the phone conversation was inappropriate and such conduct is unacceptable. The safety board, in a pointed statement, said it was too early to reach any conclusions about controllers in the crash.

The supervisor's conduct also is being investigated because he was out of the building at the time. Controllers, including supervisors, are expected to be available throughout their work shift in case they are needed, even if they are taking a break.

The NTSB report said two other Teterboro controllers were taking a break at the time of the accident. The only controllers on duty were the controller who was talking on the phone and another controller who was handling arriving planes and ground traffic.

The phone call, made on a landline that controllers use to contact other parts of the airport, was to an employee of Baltimore-based AvPORTS, a contractor for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which manages the airport, according to port authority officials.

"He was talking to the Port Authority about a dead cat on the taxiway ... it turned into a silly conversation," said Barrett Byrnes, a recently retired air traffic controller and former National Air Traffic Controllers Association representative who stays in touch with New York and New Jersey controllers. "There was a little banter."

Three officials close to the investigation verified that the banter was about a cat carcass on the airport grounds.

A federal task force began work Friday on improving safety procedures for pilots flying in the busy airspace around New York City and was given 10 days to report, the FAA said.
I'd like to think that this screams for a lolcat, but I highly doubt that that's the case.
 
I think it was really a sex line.
 
Someone totally needs to make a lolcat from this.
 
Ceiling cat was to blame?

But really, what I read in the NY papers was that at the low altitude they all were at, they didn't need ATC monitoring. Allegation was because of that, some pilots don't bother to do radio checks or something resulting in some mutual ignorance of pilot locations. Tragic really.
 
The controller being on the phone seems irrelevant to the accident?
 
He switched it over to Newark before the crash. Then neither one could get a response. Then the plane crashed. Nobody really needs to be fired from this. Perhaps disciplined for remaining on the phone, but it still wasn't his fault/nothing he could do about it.
 
The controller being on the phone seems irrelevant to the accident?

Basically irrelevant in that the vehicles might not have been his job responsibility, based on their altitudes. Don't quote me on it. It's just what I recall reading about the accident in the major NYC papers.

Sure, he might have alerted the pilots as a courtesy, but the OP articles clearly states that the FAA wasn't claiming the ATC was a factor in the accident. Given the amount of negligence described in the article (i.e. if the ATC was on duty for those pilots, he sure wasn't doing that job), the FAA mostly clearing the ATC suggests the pilots weren't technically the ATC's responsibility within the scope of the law.
 
Whether or not ATC is actually at fault is in question obviously but the controller shouldn't have been on the phone at the same time as the Watch Sup out of the control room. You never have more then one controller responsible for aircraft in the air out of position\on phone at a time. I mean where I work we have three positions that are responsible for the same five mile radius of airspace. If one is in the bathroom or smoking the other two try to stay off the phone, and if they have to take a call then the third sure as hell isn't doing anything like talk on the phone or leave position.
 
Well, that job does suck, after all...
 
What strikes me is that apparently the plane was coming up more or less behind the helicopter. And it was not a fast plane. Which is a striking level of inattention on that person's part.
 
Sure, he might have alerted the pilots as a courtesy, but the OP articles clearly states that the FAA wasn't claiming the ATC was a factor in the accident. Given the amount of negligence described in the article (i.e. if the ATC was on duty for those pilots, he sure wasn't doing that job), the FAA mostly clearing the ATC suggests the pilots weren't technically the ATC's responsibility within the scope of the law.
Yep. The fact that it later came out that he was on the phone discussing the death of the cat really has nothing to do with the crash, as the FAA stated.

What strikes me is that apparently the plane was coming up more or less behind the helicopter. And it was not a fast plane. Which is a striking level of inattention on that person's part.
Indeed. And that is especially true of where he was at the time. That part of NYC is a madhouse of private aircraft, commercial helicopters, and government helicopters. To run into a helicopter in broad daylight under apparently ideal visual conditions shows extreme inattention or even complete incompetence on the part of the pilot of the plane. And to help matters, there are also essentially 'highways' set up on both sides of the Hudson for inbound and outbound traffic. It sounds like he was flying down the middle or across the traffic flow if he hit a tour helicopter.
 
Or a medical problem. Was that person's body found for autopsy? As I understand it was an experienced pilot.
 
Must be horrible to have a job where it is enough that you screw up for a minute and you will be on national television.

Tell that to the prez. :nuke:
 
Why is this news? This has NOTHING to do with the crash. Why are some people so burn happy that they have to drag any poor guy on this witch hunt?

This guy could well get fired for something that he didn't do. But hey, got to sell those news papers someway.
 
And what about the cat?

There's a whole dead cat in every bar of Dead Cat Soap. Firesign Theater.
 
Back
Top Bottom