Altered Maps 4: Partitioning Eastern Europe Like In The Good Old Days

Status
Not open for further replies.
True. "Red-skinned heathen savages" would be more in line with contemporary naming conventions :)

The map's from 1920 so most Indians would be part of glorious Christiandom. I think Amerindian is used because it's a politically-neutral term, to distinguish between the "brown" Indians and the "red" Indians, not as a euphemism. It's the height of the Red Scare so using "Red" would be inappropriate.
 
North-Western continent on a fictional planet I am working on (occasionally):

(map shows biome and it's shaded - not very pretty, I admit)
continent1fullshaded.jpg


And here are details of the major gulf on the eastern seaboard of that continent:

Spoiler :

Elevation:
c1detailterrain.png


Vegetation:
c1detailbiome.png

 
Whoa...

I used to do something like this. One day I chuck all the maps into the bin.

Why? :)

It's just an experiment of mine - a mix of my interests in science-fiction spiced with a bit of fantasy. It's very incomplete, so when I have some time to spare and when I am in the mood, I add more details. So far I focused on the eastern seaboard only.
 
It became an obsession at some point. I often waste a whole day finishing a map. I also came up with a history for each country, flags and lists of rulers, among other things. Over time different variations developed as well, either because I couldn't get the landmasses to "look right", or I want to do something specific with a certain country. One day when I was really depressed I just threw the whole lot into the bin. I'll probably start on another one when I have time, but this time I'll start afresh.
 
It became an obsession at some point. I often waste a whole day finishing a map. I also came up with a history for each country, flags and lists of rulers, among other things. Over time different variations developed as well, either because I couldn't get the landmasses to "look right", or I want to do something specific with a certain country. One day when I was really depressed I just threw the whole lot into the bin. I'll probably start on another one when I have time, but this time I'll start afresh.

Ah, this can't happen to me :) I only obsess about something for a very short time, then my interest shifts to something else. Eventually I get back to the first thing, but it usually takes weeks or months. It pretty sucks when you're trying to do something useful though.
 
:cringe:

Well in that case... Im going to be petty and immature and say this.

"You Europeans spent the last 1600 years killing each other for things that you glorify to be so damn important "Ohhhh, Im a Pole. Im different than you... I used to so strong... My culture is soooooo Central European, I want independence." to such a high standard when in actual fact, they are stupid, arbitary and just plain waste of time. And then after getting your so called right to do whatever you want, you all declare that you are all the same and try to be one country again. And then, you bicker with each other and call the Irish douches because they didnt sign stupid treaty and plan to expel them."

Europeans are high maintenance and rather silly...

Well... That's about right...
 
I can't, though I can usually differentiate between a Chinese and Japanese, Koreans, or SE Asians. If I see a white person I can't tell whether s/he is English or French or German.

No, i Didn't say that, I have a Philosophy of telling apart different asians. If they have a long face with more roundish eyes, than they are Japanese, if they have a smaller rounder head than they are Chinese, if they are in between and a little chubby than they are Korean.

Viet's look distinctly different as do other SE Asians.

I thank my grade-school's from Toronto and being in class with a ton of Asians for that.
 
North-Western continent on a fictional planet I am working on (occasionally):

(map shows biome and it's shaded - not very pretty, I admit)
continent1fullshaded.jpg


And here are details of the major gulf on the eastern seaboard of that continent:

Spoiler :

Elevation:
c1detailterrain.png


Vegetation:
c1detailbiome.png


Something about that map grates me geologically. I can't really put my finger on it, possibly it is the mountain pattern, but something about it leaps out at me and shouts fake.
 
People usualy want to leave poor eastern european countries.

Like Romania right?

Central Europe is a bit different however...

And since we opened such an interesting topic, it's time for some maps :mischief:

WARNING, it's an old historical map so it uses terms which are no longer politically correct. I seriously hope nobody will jump to conclusions (or give me infractions) for presenting historical documents:

Spoiler :
sm0036-WorldEthnographic(d8857).jpg

world_races_1911.jpg

Love it! "AUSTRALIAN RACE" "the CHINESE-JAPANESE" :lol:
 
The last one what are you? Polish, Venezualian or Canadian?
 
How about all 3? I can explain in detail more if you want... Maybe I will open up a 'Family History' thread or something.
 
Something about that map grates me geologically. I can't really put my finger on it, possibly it is the mountain pattern, but something about it leaps out at me and shouts fake.

Think harder :D I tried to make it as geologically plausible as my meager knowledge allowed me, but I was never quite satisfied with it. If you could tell me exactly what is wrong with it, I'd be grateful.

Perhaps an unshaded map would help...?

Spoiler :
c1bigterrain.png
 
Like Romania right?

Central Europe is a bit different however...

Out of interest, do you see Croatia as being in South-East Europe or South-Central Europe?
 
800px-GDP_growth_2008.png


GDP growth in 2008.
 
^Booo Iceland!

Out of interest, do you see Croatia as being in South-East Europe or South-Central Europe?

It's a tough cookie to crack, Slovenia culturally is Central European, but Croatia? I'm not sure, they are basically Catholic Serbs... There one of the countries that fit in two catagories, like Lithuania or Greece.
 
Think harder :D I tried to make it as geologically plausible as my meager knowledge allowed me, but I was never quite satisfied with it. If you could tell me exactly what is wrong with it, I'd be grateful.

Perhaps an unshaded map would help...?

Spoiler :
c1bigterrain.png

I think it is two aspects: first is the sudden change. The map to begin with (from the bottom and upwards) has some nice smooth lines. These are consistent with the kind of lines you would expect from continental drift, as most maintain chains are. Then you suddenly enter an area where mountains and highlands seem to be thrown in randomly without thought about where they fit in.

Secondly it is the valleys to west in the map. Valleys can broadly be defined by two types: river valleys and glacial valleys. Those on the map do not appear to fit into either. This is because there are no apparent drainage basins in that map. Drainage basins are areas where rainfall flows in a specific direction. Rivers and glaciers tend to more or less follow these patterns. Simply throwing them in doesn't really make for good maps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom