? North korea is not only country in the world which has stable boarders. Also liberal and democratic countries have agreed their boarders, culture cant move them..
Thanks, I will try to turn on logging and reproduce that crash.
I understand that despotism is usable in modern eras but what about realism
and Ukraine boarders are moved by "green mens" with very modern weapons not libraries or museums
Yes, but most of the monarchies are actually democracies
Maybe couple more "nice" civics with fixed boarders..? only a humble opinion.
Here are the logs, I chose multiplayer scenario with AND2 15-player world map which comes with the mod. Crash
Revision is 792, I checked that again.
and Ukraine boarders are moved by "green mens" with very modern weapons not libraries or museums
45°38'N-13°47'E;13414446 said:
Yes yes, I do not disagree
I only say that democracy and liberal civs also has stable boarders and they also use force to defend their boarders against foreign attackers or domestic groups (only unstable and weak state allows another state to move their boarders without fight, support from locals helps but guns are needed) and claim territories to achieve resources. Current civic system gives that possibility only monarchies, despotism and intolerant.
45°38'N-13°47'E;13414484 said:
If this is balance/gameplay issue, I have no real opinion..
But if coal is realism then I dont understand current system. Theres no way that monarchy, dictator or fanatic religious system helps society to maintain stable boarders.
One might even say that working democratic free society keeps your own people happy and united which leads strong state and very stable boarders.. those dictatorships and ISIS kind of intolerancies are actually more vulnerable to "cultural" conquest and current system is just the opposite
Iraq is a democracy, so the ISIS argument only backs up my point that Democracies are unstable.
In the years when Saddam Hussian ran the country in an ironifisted dicatorship, terrorists never siezed a foothold. Al Qaeda, contrary to US propaganda, was never allowed to operate in Hussian's Iraq. The US wars and democracy have turned the country from a stable (if harsh) dictatorship, to an anarchic hellscape.
Believe or not we have here in europe some pretty democratic and working states and ukraine was first time since second WW when boarders were moved by force.. My point still stays, cruel force and terror is not the only way to maintain society peace, good foreign relations and yet keep your boarders stable
45°38'N-13°47'E;13414575 said:
IRA and Basque never was real threat when it comes state boarders. Also both gave up their weapons and chose political way.. which is only possible in working democracy
Where's that "Like" button...Iraq is a democracy, so the ISIS argument only backs up my point that Democracies are unstable.
In the years when Saddam Hussian ran the country in an ironifisted dicatorship, terrorists never siezed a foothold. Al Qaeda, contrary to US propaganda, was never allowed to operate in Hussian's Iraq. The US wars and democracy have turned the country from a stable (if harsh) dictatorship, to an anarchic hellscape.
