Beefjack interview (Morocco hinted?)

InsanelyApple said:
We do have a mad queen, a former prostitute, and someone famous for losing to the Romans as female leaders. A leader famous for losing to the Arabs wouldn't be to much of stretch.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You forgot the semi-mythological queen that may or may not have existed and the concubine.
 
Hmmm? Having a woman lead Morocco?
Once they figure that out in Morocco that might cause a bit of controversy. I wouldn't be surprised if they picked a man.
 
The name I mentioned (Zaynab an-Nafzawiyyah) is essentially viewed as the founder of the Almoravid dynasty. Unfortunately, I can't poll any Moroccans, but I doubt they'd consider her unworthy since she's essential to their founding identity.
 
They're royal house is supposedly directly descended from Mohammed, I'd assume the Moroccans would be more pleased if they're lead by somebody from the current Dynasty or at least a Muslim and not a woman known for opposing Islam. :dunno:
She's also not a leader of Morocco but a Berber tribe. Firaxis clearly called the civ Morocco and not Berbers, so I believe the leader will be Moroccan as well and not just some Berber ruler.
 
nunor said:
Why would it be a problem for Morocco? They're not anti-women AFAIK.
Click to expand...
Last year the Moroccan Parliament withdrew a law that allowed rapists to avoid their penalty by marrying the victim. This only happened after the international commotion from a case in which a 16 year old committed suicide because she was forced to marry the man that raped her.
This is not a modern western country but a quite conservative one. You would have to take into consideration if the people would appreciate it. Looking at the way how they handled the Pueblo civ it wouldn't be unthinkable to skip a female leader.
 
Louis XXIV said:
The name I mentioned (Zaynab an-Nafzawiyyah) is essentially viewed as the founder of the Almoravid dynasty. Unfortunately, I can't poll any Moroccans, but I doubt they'd consider her unworthy since she's essential to their founding identity.
Click to expand...
If that would be the case then it might pass =) we'll have to see how Fixaris is going to work it out.
 
I don't think Morocco is a serious marketing concern for them either way. Certainly, including a figure that would offend the Muslim world in general (e.g., having Muhammad as a leader) would be a bad idea, but they are probably no more concerned about offending Morocco than they are Portugal.
 
Louis XXIV said:
I don't think Morocco is a serious marketing concern for them either way. Certainly, including a figure that would offend the Muslim world in general (e.g., having Muhammad as a leader) would be a bad idea, but they are probably no more concerned about offending Morocco than they are Portugal.
Click to expand...

They probably don't want to offend anybody, as shown by the entire Pueblo affair.
 
Rather than take a tangent that may get this thread closed, we should discuss possible UU and UA, I don't know a lot about Morocco (makes nice rugs) so I was thinking something like

UU could be Black Guard, but I've no idea the bonuses it could have
I don't even know where to begin for the UA, but that's why it's a discussion
 
This is a large thread and I haven't covered all of it but I have a question: has there been a general consensus on who the civ leader for Morocco could be?
 
alpha2117 said:
Sorry I rememeber now (the Morrocan killed a Frenchman).

Probably means Morocco but the term could still be being used for a pan civ from Nth African. It's probably Morocco but on one word it's very hard to extrapolate definitive details. I honestly think given the developers love of female leaders Kahina is still a huge chance to be the leader here no matter what.
Click to expand...
Why is it again that this "moroccan killing a french spearman" couldn't just be a scenario only-civilization? Afterall, France was a colonial power of Morocco, so it does make sense it is a scenario-only civ.
 
Sporally said:
Why is it again that this "moroccan killing a french spearman" couldn't just be a scenario only-civilization? Afterall, France was a colonial power of Morocco, so it does make sense it is a scenario-only civ.
Click to expand...

Except that the French wouldn't be using "spearmen" in the mid to late 1800s when the Scramble for Africa scenario is taking place. (And the Moroccans wouldn't be using "Warriors" either.)
 
Sporally said:
Why is it again that this "moroccan killing a french spearman" couldn't just be a scenario only-civilization? Afterall, France was a colonial power of Morocco, so it does make sense it is a scenario-only civ.
Click to expand...

Because if it was in the scenario then spearmen would not be fighting warriors.

EDIT: Ninja'd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The_J
Can you make an anti-imperial empire game? The 4Xperts behind Civilization, Syphilisation and Victoria 3 discuss eXperimental 4X design
Replies
5
Views
3K
martindo
M
pokiehl
Confirmation that Civ 7 did not "steal" civilization-switching from Humankind
3 4 5
Replies
86
Views
14K
Auraiz
A
B
Civ 5 is disappointing
Replies
5
Views
4K
Bonyduck Campersang
Bonyduck Campersang
Nizef
TSG 265 Announcement
Replies
6
Views
1K
Ecocrexis
E
Kenshiro70
Civ VII Post-mortem: Crafting a redemption arc
5 6 7
Replies
128
Views
7K
Krikkit1
K
Back
Top Bottom