Sporally
Prince
Ah yes, forgot about thatExcept that the French wouldn't be using "spearmen" in the mid to late 1800s when the Scramble for Africa scenario is taking place. (And the Moroccans wouldn't be using "Warriors" either.)

Ah yes, forgot about thatExcept that the French wouldn't be using "spearmen" in the mid to late 1800s when the Scramble for Africa scenario is taking place. (And the Moroccans wouldn't be using "Warriors" either.)
(...) Dido & Theodora come to mind. (...)
Dido, if it really existed, was not a weak option. If we stop to think about the Carthaginian rulers, it is practically the only one that stands out. Hannibal, Hasdrubal and Hamílcar were generals, and choose any of them would be like putting Patton as U.S. leader. Hanno (do not know why this obsession of the Carthaginians by names beginning with H. ..) was a navigator, like Columbus and Vasco da Gama. To be honest, I never heard the name of any other leader of Carthage Dido plus ... (Really sorry by my English)
Hannibal and Hamilcar (I think Hamilcar but I know Hannibal) were members of the Carthaginian council thing and really represented Carthage, anyway. Also, there was a series of kings and one of the greatest was named Hanno, so he would have been a good choice as well. I suppose that if Dido really existed she wasn't a bad choice, but the question is IF she really existed, and what her accomplishments were other than founding Carthage.
Thanks for the post, I didn't know that Hannibal and Hamilcar were part of the Conceil, but I know that the Barca family was very influential. And I thought Hanno was only the leader of his formidable fleet, because he traveled along with it, and do not know how he controlled his people leagues away on that epoch... But it may be that they were different people.
The King Hanno was entirely different from the explorer Hanno. Sort of like how the King Hannibal is entirely different from the general Hannibal.
EDIT: Just so I don't forget to say this - King Hanno the Great lead the Carthaginians against the Greeks in Sicily.
(...) Dido & Theodora come to mind. (...)
Dido, if it really existed, was not a weak option. If we stop to think about the Carthaginian rulers, it is practically the only one that stands out. Hannibal, Hasdrubal and Hamílcar were generals, and choose any of them would be like putting Patton as U.S. leader. Hanno (do not know why this obsession of the Carthaginians by names beginning with H. ..) was a navigator, like Columbus and Vasco da Gama. To be honest, I never heard the name of any other leader of Carthage Dido plus ... (Really sorry by my English)
Again, Kahina is not a very likely leader.
The civ is clearly called Morocco and not Moors, Berbers or Maghreb. While Kahina is a sort of hero for Berbers, she has absolutely nothing to do with the state of Morocco. She didn't lead Morocco or anything that can be regarded as a precursor to Morocco. She might be a national hero like Boudicca, but that doesn't make her a viable leader choice. Boudicca can't lead England as she has no relation to state of England at all and for the same reason Kahina can't lead Morocco.
Also Firaxis never used the name of a modern country for an agglomeration civ and it's unlikely they're going to break with this rule just for the sake of adding Kahina.
From what i understand, this is already an agglomeration civ seeing as it is called Morocco and its UI is a Kasbah.
And...? She is still the mother of the two sons who were pivotal in breaking Morocco away from the caliphate. Nothing wrong with her potentially being the Moroccan leader on that regard
Did Boudicca's sons found the English Empire though? Not really the same thing