Bible talk

But I have no understanding of Chaucer as early modern.
Chaucer is not Early Modern. Chaucer is Middle English. But the Geneva Bible is Early Modern. So it's easier to read than Chaucer. If you've read Chaucer, reading the Geneva Bible will be easier than that. Only about as difficult as King James.

Here's the text we have under consideration in the Geneva translation:

And Jesus full of the holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by that Spirit into the wilderness,
 
But that would result in people who speak different languages having pretty different content in their Bible depending on both what was avaialable at the time of first translation, and what the first translators believed.

For a particularly clear cut example, take Greek. Now, while modern Greek isn't identical to the Greek written 2000 years ago, AFAIK they're very close (intentionally so), so a Greek speaking person could go back to the text of Bibles written back then and consider it their native tongue. For the OT, we're looking at a translation at least as far back at least the Septuagint, which contains quite a bit of content not present in the OT of many more modern Bibles, particularly those from Protestant traditions (mainly the dueterocanonical books). On the other hand, the books of the NT were written in Greek, but the earliest copies of many of them are missing passages that appear in most later editions, indicating those passages are later additions.
Perhaps I did not consider Greek. English was not around so I was looking it from my perspective.
 
Chaucer is not Early Modern. Chaucer is Middle English. But the Geneva Bible is Early Modern. So it's easier to read than Chaucer.
Yes, it is by a long shot. I might have confused the Geneva with one of the earlier bibles. Something I read and flung my hands up.
 
The earliest is Tyndale. Here's Luke 4:1 in Tyndale:

1 Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, left the Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,

If you can read KJV, I don't think there's an English translation you can't read.

Unless you were reading a facsimile. The typescript of these old texts is crazy-demanding to read.
 
Last edited:
The KJV was created with both politics and religious bias in mind.
 
The earliest is Tyndale. Here's Luke 4:1 in Tyndale:



If you can read KJV, I don't think there's an English translation you can't read.

Unless you were reading a facsimile. The typescript of these old texts is crazy-demanding to read.
Maybe it was this one? Readable but not comfortable.

24 And delyver them beastes, that they maye sett Paul on, and brynge hym safe unto Felix the hye debyte (For he dyd feare lest happlye the Jewes shulde take hym awaye and kyll hym, and he hym selfe shulde be afterwarde blamed, as though he wolde take money,) 25 and he wrote a letter after thys maner.

— Acts 23:24–25, Great Bible
 
Got it. Yes, if you work from a version that doesn't modernize spelling, it is an extra challenge. (Even that you'd adjust to in, I'd estimate, three or four hours; you just sound the words out phonetically for a while, and shortly "wolde" just starts looking like "would" to you).
 
It is not likely that anyone will be around to write the lost history of the civilization of America, much less the story of its last dark prince, but if it were told, the most brilliant flash of humanity would be tragically revealed to have fallen due to its inability to control its thirst for the most base and common of lusts. From Elvis to Trump, the selling of the national soul for nothing, absolutely nothing, and now the pagan hordes rise up to swallow our children and somewhere a star ceases to twinkle in silent salute to the passing as all things await the cleansing wrath of a righteous God. Come Lord Jesus. Come quickly.
Christians have been predicting "the rapture is upon us" for 2000 years hoping it will cleanse the world and fix all their problems. The likelihood of it happening is pretty small.

"...the cleansing wrath of a righteous God." seems to be just more hate and love of punishing.
 
Christians have been predicting "the rapture is upon us" for 2000 years hoping it will cleanse the world and fix all their problems. The likelihood of it happening is pretty small.

"...the cleansing wrath of a righteous God." seems to be just more hate and love of punishing.
End-times? Yes. The Rapture? No. The Rapture is very new, dating from the late 19th century at best. And it's meant to take the righteous to heaven, not the baddies. ;)
 
@Moff Jerjerrod so i finally got around to watching the long documentary you suggested.

timestamps of mine are a bit off here. so. at 26 minutes in it starts talking about how the other spirits influence geopolitics, and i got worried. it almost started flying off the rails, and then it returned to its former musings. 42:56 same weird thing, satan being the ruler of the world. and 1:07:58 ish "who rules the nations now? the fallen sons of god". this is where it baits you through implication.

a lot of it is somewhat good. from what i understand, the interpretations of other gods below god or presence of supernatural gods beyond god isn't particularly novel. the idea is that the original jewish god was indeed just a god over a "chosen people" in the status quo of the middle east which was filled to the brim with other faiths. so that part of the documentary wasn't very novel.

history. so initially, the system of belief was polytheistic, but still that for the jews, who naturally thought themselves right, yahweh was the best god, the primary god, the one to follow, since it was the god of the people in question. since then the whole "no other gods before me" kind of developed into monotheism. so this documentary opens up well into that idea, and there's some weird connections of stuff to baha'i and other things which i do appreciate, because i love mysticism. my issue is that it's informing the mainstream us recipient (because that's what it's obviously targeting, sorry) to prepare for battle against satan that rules the nations today. it's one of those things where it's hidden enough to not make the rest of the speculation nonsense, but prominent enough to push for that disposition.
 
You don't think the notion of the Bible containing some hidden astrological allegories is a small, trivial detail? I'd think that sort of thing would be right up your alley.

In any case, I like the idea... makes the whole thing more mysterious and feeds into the notion that the Bible has more to it than meets the eye... maybe even more mysteries to reveal themselves over time, who knows.
Not when it gets inflated to an eras-of-history kind of formulation, which, to make it astrological automatically does.

Not sure I want the Bible to have any mysteries. It already gradually unfolds new meanings to me over time. That's not quite the same thing as a mystery.
Hm. There are some books I enjoy that are so complex that I gain new insights every time I re-read them. But I wouldn't call them mysteries. It's just that Frank Herbert and C.J. Cherryh were/are very intelligent people who put a phenomenal amount of research into their work.

You want food for thought? I recommend Cyteen, by C.J. Cherryh. You're not going to find much religion in it, because the main characters aren't religious. But some of them are geneticists and sociologists and biologists and wrestle with the ethics of terraforming other planets for the purpose of humans.

That's not to say there isn't discussion of religion, though. There is, in a sociological sense. It's rather fascinating.

I've got 2 videos to share.

The first one talks about the concept of "wrestling against the unseen realm not flesh and blood" and the second one talks about the upcoming eclipse over the United States coming in April 8, 2024.

Discuss or disagree, I'm all ears and value your thoughts.

1 hour documentary

Short video
The short video is sheer nonsense. For one thing, he had to tip the atheist symbol on its side to make his doom mongering work.

For two things, yes, a bunch of rocks is actually part of why this is happening. They just happen to be very large rocks, that gravity molded into spheres. One rock is Earth and the other is the Moon.

For three things, there's nothing sinister about eclipses. They're beautiful. It's only a partial here in this region of the country, and I was chatting with someone in Nunavut a few days ago on FB; he said there would be about 42% totality in his region. I looked up the local times, and I'm in a prime location to see at least part of it. My windows face the right direction at approximately 11:30 am here, so that's perfect.

For four things, the Moon happens to be at exactly the right distance from Earth to make total eclipses possible. But the Moon is gradually increasing its distance from Earth, so as time goes on it will appear smaller. Eventually it will get to the point where we don't get total eclipses anymore. So enjoy them while we have them, just as we should enjoy looking at those beautiful bright, massive stars that are so familiar. They're the ones massive enough to go KA-BOOM in supernova explosions, and some may already have done so - but they're far enough away that nobody here will see the evidence for decades, or even centuries. It's going to put a definite dent in Orion when it happens. We're going to need some new constellations.

Regarding the second video, I'll presume to answer on behalf of Athiest: No, none of that is interesting.
I actually snickered throughout most of it.

Are you aware there is no instance of instrumental music in New Testament worship and if so, please expound on the controversy over using instruments in the Church today?
Hmm. This sounds like an excellent reason to put a stop to those incredibly annoying Christmas carols in public places.

I don't think this is correct, (see below). However, it is common for some Christian fundamentalists to reject music in all its forms as being of the devil. I have encountered this personally in some of the elderly members of my own family who belong to certain very strict Christian sects. They disapproved of all forms of music except singing, and even singing was restricted to hymnals. they have all passed away by now, but I do remember their disallowance of music from my childhood. My mother and aunts had even more experience with this as they had a longer experience with even more of those particular family members and their religion.

"2 And I heard a voice from heaven, like the sound of many waters and like the sound of loud thunder, and the voice which I heard was like the sound of harpists playing on their harps 3 And they sang a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders; and no one could learn the song except the one hundred and forty-four thousand who had been purchased from the earth." -Revelation 14:2-3

"Then the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared to sound them." - Revelation 8:6

"2 And I saw something like a sea of glass mixed with fire, and those who had been victorious over the beast and his image and the number of his name, standing on the sea of glass, holding harps of God. 3 And they *sang the song of Moses, the bond-servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying,“Great and marvelous are Your works,O Lord God, the Almighty;Righteous and true are Your ways,King of the nations!" - Revelation 15:2-3

“We played the pipe for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge, and you did not mourn."- Matthew 11:17

"8 When He had taken the book, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each one holding a harp and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints. 9 And they *sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are You to take the book and to break its seals; for You were slain, and purchased for God with Your blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation. - Revelation 5:8-9

"If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal."- 1 Corinthians 13:1

"Now his older son was in the field, and when he came and approached the house, he heard music and dancing." - Luke 15:25

"Even in the case of lifeless things that make sounds, such as the pipe or harp, how will anyone know what tune is being played unless there is a distinction in the notes?"- 1 Corinthians 14:7

"Again, if the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle?" - 1 Corinthians 14:8
That's very sad, to be denied music. :(

I'm reminded of a musical I took part in for a Christmas concert in Grade 9 (December 1976). The music teacher decided that we were going to do "It's Cool in the Furnace" for the Christmas concert, and since I'd started taking organ lessons (after years of playing by ear), the teacher arranged to borrow an organ from a music store.

I still have the sheet music for that, around somewhere. I've just had a quick look online to see if I could find the lyrics to one of the songs that specifically mentions instruments (organ, harp, tympani, etc.), but all I've found are sites where the sheet music is for sale. The song is "Let the People Praise", and while I don't relate to the lyrics, the music itself sounds great on the organ, though the sheet music is written for piano. I had to come up with my own arrangement for the pedals.

The Church does not use musical instruments such as the harp or lyre when praising God, lest she should seem to lapse into Judaism ... As Aristotle says, "Flutes ought not to be introduced into teaching, nor any artificial instrument such as the harp, nor anything of the kind, but only such things as make men good (or possibly, 'foster attentive listeners')." For musical instruments usually move the soul more to pleasure than create a good internal disposition. But in the Old Testament, instruments of this kind were used, both because the people were more coarse and carnal, so that they needed to be aroused by such instruments and with temporal promises, and also because these bodily instruments were figurative of something.
Thomas Aquinas
sometime in the 13th century
:lol:

I'm going to riff on this. I personally find it ick whenever the pastor gets out a guitar. I know the praise jam fru-fru music is coming out. Doesn't work for me, never did. I don't think it's the guitar though, it's just a temperament that doesn't jive in context personally. Love the old pipe organ they've managed to keep running for the moment, though. Keeps me in the neighborhood of the right pitch.
There's something about finding the right music and just cranking it up. My grandmother loved "Amazing Grace".

But as I posted previously, the New Testament explicitly references musical instruments, and specifically playing instruments while singing praises to God. So Aquinas is shooting from the hip a little here.
I guess he would have hated Wuauquikuna. Granted, this isn't a church hymn kind of hymn, but there are biblical references in the lyrics:


This video was shot near their family's home in Ecuador.

Lately he's been hitting some good topics that make sense to me, like this whole eclipse business.
Seriously? You really think he's onto something? Honestly, it's sheer nonsense. Eclipses happen. They happen not only here, but on any planet with moons at the right distance and with the right orbit. Of course we can't actually go there in person to experience them, but they do happen. It's physics.

God has been driven out of our schools, government, public places, etc. and from how I'm looking at it could this be some kind of warning in the form on an eclipse for the usa? Any nation on this planet can receive communication from God, not just the us. This could be an example of signs of moral decay to add to our list we've been talking about.

Unrelated but maybe indeed related is the rise of a one world order and the usa is in the way and needs to be removed, or at least diminished, according to the elites. This is a topic outside of this thread however.
This eclipse isn't only visible in the U.S. And eclipses have zip-all nothing to do with "moral decay." Eclipses were happening here long before there were humans to notice them.

There are more Christians alive today than at any other time in history.
You wouldn't know it according to the right-wingers in my province. The ex-premier, Jason Kenney, is hosting some sort of conference or gathering where they can all get together and complain about how "persecuted" they are... not long after the current premier decided to take away certain rights of LGBT children.

Shakespeare is lost to us. I think it a shame. I did read the Canterbury Tales but ye old English is a bridge too far even for me
You've said this before. In what way is Shakespeare "lost" to us? There are many sites where you can read his plays and poems for free, and I have some in my book collection.

The only way in which Shakespeare could be said to be "lost" is that some of the rhymes don't work with modern English pronunciations.

And consider this: Way back when, most average people weren't literate. So the actual literature was often written in a way that was intended to be performed, or read to others. That's why people get frustrated with Shakespeare when all they can do is read the plays. It takes actually seeing them performed to really get into it.

Canterbury Tales is admittedly harder. The pronunciations were quite different, and there are words unfamiliar to us. I find Old and Middle English to be more lyrical and lilting, or so it was when I watched those episodes of The Story of English (fascinating documentary series; it's available online).

I do know that demons operate by attacking words and concepts and meanings and casting confusions.
Sounds like my provincial government.
 
Hmmm....Corbin Bernsen? Wasn't he a TV actor at point in some legal show?
 
There's something about finding the right music and just cranking it up. My grandmother loved "Amazing Grace".
I guess he would have hated Wuauquikuna. Granted, this isn't a church hymn kind of hymn, but there are biblical references in the lyrics:


This video was shot near their family's home in Ecuador.
What do you mean? Its a beautiful church hymn!

My wife always insists that we go to Christmas mass every year as a family... Besides the decorations inside the church, which are breathtaking, the singer who comes every year to perform "Hallelujah" is pretty much my favourite part. They turn the house lights off and the only thing you can see are the Christmas lights and hear the singing and piano in the darkness. Absolutely beautiful.
 
One does get tired of it.

Though there's a lot of truth to how that word of praise works.

It's Lent tho, no H word.
 
What do you mean? Its a beautiful church hymn!

My wife always insists that we go to Christmas mass every year as a family... Besides the decorations inside the church, which are breathtaking, the singer who comes every year to perform "Hallelujah" is pretty much my favourite part. They turn the house lights off and the only thing you can see are the Christmas lights and hear the singing and piano in the darkness. Absolutely beautiful.
People sing Simon & Garfunkel in church?

TIL.

I'm not saying it isn't a beautiful song. The melody is beautiful, no matter what instruments are used (I've heard it on the zither, as well), or if it's a capella. I'm just saying I didn't expect it to be considered a hymn people would sing in church.

You're not going to hear either Fabian or Luis Salazar (Wuauquikuna) singing it, though. Or at least not in English. They only sing in Spanish and Quechua (they have beautiful singing voices, and I don't care that I can't understand 99.9% of it).
 
Back
Top Bottom