Shouldn't this guy be playing Jesus instead?
Edit: Shouldn't I have read page 2 before posting?
Edit: Shouldn't I have read page 2 before posting?
^nerds
It depicted a Tea Party rally with one of the racist signs that have popped up at those things."In early 2010 they even used their Captain America comic to attack the TEA Party movement"
Wait. What? Really?
It depicted a Tea Party rally with one of the racist signs that have popped up at those things.
Cap commented to the effect that it made him a sad panda.
Nor was he white.
If I were a racist, I would be complaining too.That's largely what it was, though some people complained about it conflating racism and the tea party movement.
A great many Scandinavians from 1000 years ago had already been converted to Christianity.I don't think Scandinavians from 1,000 years ago felt a lot of pressure for interracial inclusiveness in their religion.
And naturally there were no black men in Spain during Shakespeare's time...I don't agree with much of what those guys say (extremist left-wing views, lol) but I'm actually prety annoyed about a black guy playing a norse god, just like I was anoyed about Denzel Washington playing a spanish nobleman in a movieversion of Much Ado About Nothing.
I agree - never thought I'd find another person who would come out and say so, though. It's not a viewpoint that garners much sympathy over at TrekBBS.I was more peeved about the black Vulcan in Voyager. If you want a different colour alien, make him green or purple.
And in the 1960s, Gene Roddenberry used Star Trek to attack a whole trainload of political and societal issues. That's what contemporary literature/performing arts does, no matter what its time period."In early 2010 they even used their Captain America comic to attack the TEA Party movement"
Wait. What? Really?
I just assumed Keanu's character was adopted...Denzel playing Keanu's brother was easily the best part of that movie. The rest of it was forgettable, standard staging of a decent Shakespeare play, but Denzel + Keanu...comic friggin gold man
Some black actors have a definite accent that makes them "sound" black. At least that's true for the way I perceive voices."Portrayed ?"
I doubt that you could see the guy.
Or did he sound obviously black like Keith David ?
And naturally there were no black men in Spain during Shakespeare's time...
Actually, Much Ado About Nothing is the only movie I've ever seen Denzel Washington in. I thought he played the part very well. And since the Branagh version was taken out of its proper time period anyway, what difference does it make if a black man portrayed a Spaniard, when there were already lots of black men in Spain?
I just assumed Keanu's character was adopted...
Even a racist clock is right twice a day.
I'd've put this in humour and jokes if it weren't for the fact that it's sadly real.
http://boycott-thor.com/
They are upset that a guy, who never existed and thus never had a race or a face, is being played by a black guy. Ignoring for a moment that CCC is considered a hate group, is there any reason to be upset over this?
For instance, in a movie about the Civil War, you can't make a black man the Confederate General simply because that would not have happened.