He may like a civ that can't have a surprise war declared upon.
And I would have to respond that this particular ability feels like Switzerland light.
He may like a civ that can't have a surprise war declared upon.
Ok, well, the ancient era is pretty slim pickings apart from Egypt and Mesopotamia.Dido is 8th Century BC, which really stretches it imo. Ancient Era Leaders would include Ramesses, any Hittite King or Queen, Hammurabi,
Im talking from a game play perspective. Also I was talking about civilizations not leaders. China, Greece, Cree, Aztecs, Egypt, Nubia, Scythia, Persia and Sumeria have part or all of their bonuses in the ancient era.
One of the reason we dont have a lot of leaders from 5000 or 6000 years ago is that we dont know anything about them. Also some of the really old leaders might be just mythical characters that like Gilgamesh or Dido for example.
By the way, we will be able to trade quantities of strat resources? If so, take part in an emergency or two, get friendly with AI Canada and buy up their raw resources surplus for cheap.
The real problem with the "no surprise war" is that basically every civ will end up denouncing Canada for no reason other than the ability to go to war with them. Also, Cyrus will hate their guts every game (and probably Alexander).
So Canada's "faces of peace" ability means - being hated by the international community. And their abilities are designed to encourage diplomatic victory.
I'm going to greatly enjoy watching someone crush a mp game with a horde of mounties spamming parks - it will be so funny to watch! Especially if we can hear the commentary of the players on the receiving end.
This is true. I also like that very much, and I'm sure many other peaceful players do as well. I do suspect he will take issue with many other parts of the design though.He may like a civ that can't have a surprise war declared upon.
Like the part that it is Canada?This is true. I also like that very much, and I'm sure many other peaceful players do as well. I do suspect he will take issue with many other parts of the design though.
One of the reason we dont have a lot of leaders from 5000 or 6000 years ago is that we dont know anything about them. Also some of the really old leaders might be just mythical characters that like Gilgamesh or Dido for example.
I'm quite glad I play with my brothers in Civ games then because we are generally peaceful and helpful (and we can avoid these fast domination competitive multiplayers which we find unfun), at least until someone forges an international incident usually starting mid-game and then the grudge lasts for the next LITERAL 8 years of games. But hey, FAMILY, amiright?Probably not an issue in single player, as the AI won't be coded to treat Canada differently. In multi-player, yes, it's likely auto "denounce" on sight and forever thereafter.
It's the future era city graphic, no new building I think.View attachment 511709Is there anyone who has some ideas what this building could be? there is a new building in city centre.
Future era city models.View attachment 511709Is there anyone who has some ideas what this building could be? there is a new building in city centre.
"I'm Canadian and I never saw tundra in my life. 97% of Canadians live under the tundra line. This is bullfeathers."
Well, yeah, it's well know that all cities in Hungary are built like Budapest (seriously, they took one specificity of the capital being 2 cities reunited and spread it to all the empire... If this is not ridiculous, I don't know what is. But I red nowhere people complaining about the Hungary CUA).
Or that Japan only win its war because they're a hurricane flooding their opponents (one big battle turned into a CUA is a little overreacting IMHO).
"Canada is too stereotypical, that's rubbish!"
Do we have to speak about Waltzing Matilda being the music of Australia?
The Carnival and Jungle bonuses of Brazil?
CdM drinking champagne in a flute in a complete anachronistic way, in a time where champagne were merely just a sparkly wine and not more fancy than anything else? Gilgabro, a mythical semi-god?
Scotland and they're bagpipes and golf?
Egypt led by Cleopatra despite being a greek queen and capable of building multiple big sphinxes when they are kind of rare?
only one civ capable to build an improvment on water (after all, Indonesia is just a Dutch colony)
On overall, I kind of like Canada. They appeal a slighty different gameplay. They are not gamechanging like Maori or Kongo, and they are not as interresting as Hungary or Korea, but they are not as bland as Greece, America or Japan and not as lame as Georgia.
My guess as well. Although I could imagine Ottomans getting a UB, and Mali getting the unique CH.Districts for The Ottomans and Phoenicia, buildings for Sweden and Mali and last Improvement (Terrace farm) for The Inca?
[/QUOTE]I don't understand what this is referencing. Japan just has a military unit that reflects a particularly notable part of the country's history, when it was largely warlike.
Too bad we know next to nothing about the Indus Valley.Ok, well, the ancient era is pretty slim pickings apart from Egypt and Mesopotamia.
Then after you buy them, complain that the Canadians are ripping you off to gain internal Loyalty points.![]()
View attachment 511709Is there anyone who has some ideas what this building could be? there is a new building in city centre.