Check your privileges

The only privilege that I have is being highly educated.

As for the rest... I'm a mid forties, white, lapsed-Catholic, Irish lesbian, and apparently having an accent is bad. I suspect that I would score miserably on the test if I bothered to take it.

The world is my oyster.
 
31/100

So many of these questions are completely irrelevant or make no sense if you're an atheist.
 
It's not that having an accent is bad ; but that having an accent marks you out as "foreign" which can become an obstacle or hurdle to overcome. If you get made fun of for your accent, it's likely that some people, at least, won't take you as seriously as they would someone without the accent.
 
Do you not believe that things would be even more difficult for a person with all of those characteristics who was black, or gay, or both?

Of course being black and gay in addition to my other baggage would be more difficult, but skin color and sexuality would make a relatively minor impact compared to genetics and socioeconomic status. Especially around here.
Homosexuality isn't a big deal around Cologne which is one of the most tolerant and gay friendly cities in Germany. It might have led to more bullying in my teenage years, but I was already a fat nerd so that could have been just a drop in the bucket. Dark skin would mean more everyday racism, but I already get discriminated. Multiple studies have shown that job applications with foreign names often go to the bottom of the pile and won't be considered if there's also an equally qualified Meier or Schmidt.

Now, what about somebody who is mostly like me but black and gay, and has upper-middle class parents with advanced degrees ? I refuse to believe for a second that I'm more privileged than this hypothetical guy. Your parent's education and wealth matter far more than almost anything else.
 
There's an actual quiz for this on Buzzfeed. Found here.
Amusing.
Though, as usual, it's very provincial and US-centric, some questions are unclear ("Is there a place of worship for your religion in town ?" or "all my job have done accomodation for my religious practice" for an atheist is pretty weird to answer) and some others stem more from behaviour than privilege (not giving personal information on the Internet to protect my privacy means I've not been bullied online, but this hardly means "you're privileged about not being bullied", for example).

Still, pretty privileged it seems, with 67 points.
 
31/100

So many of these questions are completely irrelevant or make no sense if you're an atheist.

For the religious questions I answered them with the thought that atheism is a 'religion' (my beliefs about God, or rather my lack of belief in him and Jesus). Workplace accommodating of my religious practice? Yeah, as long as they don't lead everyone in the lord's prayer at lunchtime or try to bring references to 'God' into the workplace, I would say they are catering to my religion.
What they really wanted to get at was giving a bunch of 'non-privilege' points for muslims (and a few other smaller groups).

What I wasn't sure of was in the last dozen or two questions were they vaguely say 'your identity', i wasn't sure if that was just sexual, gender and religious or if that includes "too skinny" otherwise I would have scored lower.

Does 'bullied' online have to include the perpetrator knowing your personal information? I know it can, and I've read the stories of members here who was bullied on other forums, but didn't know being bullied online had to include the exposing of personal information. Someone not being welcomed in a forum (beyond simply being ignored or debating/challenging their views) I would say is bullying too, even if it's not to the level of exposing personal info.
 
For the religious questions I answered them with the thought that atheism is a 'religion' (my beliefs about God, or rather my lack of belief in him and Jesus). Workplace accommodating of my religious practice? Yeah, as long as they don't lead everyone in the lord's prayer at lunchtime or try to bring references to 'God' into the workplace, I would say they are catering to my religion.
What they really wanted to get at was giving a bunch of 'non-privilege' points for muslims (and a few other smaller groups).
I can't make myself do that. Atheism isn't a religion, and it wouldn't be right (for me) to pretend it is.

That said, I can honestly say that I've been discriminated against on this issue, on numerous occasions. Forced to participate in prayers? Yep, all through Grade 1, and during my practicum for my B.Ed. program in college. And the City Clerk was NOT pleased when I refused to swear on a bible when we were going through the formalities for municipal elections/census. Come to think of it, I got a lot of dirty looks from my colleagues, too. Even my dad said, "why didn't you just do it and forget about it?".

The answer is because I wouldn't have considered it binding. It would have been like swearing on the weekly TV guide - meaningless. If I were ever to have to go to court, even they can't legally compel people to swear on any religious text.

Not bringing religion into the workplace (unless you work in a church or other place of worship) should be the default, not the exception.

What I wasn't sure of was in the last dozen or two questions were they vaguely say 'your identity', i wasn't sure if that was just sexual, gender and religious or if that includes "too skinny" otherwise I would have scored lower.
These days "identity" seems to be about what gender/orientation you are. For me, it's female, straight. Next question!

Does 'bullied' online have to include the perpetrator knowing your personal information? I know it can, and I've read the stories of members here who was bullied on other forums, but didn't know being bullied online had to include the exposing of personal information. Someone not being welcomed in a forum (beyond simply being ignored or debating/challenging their views) I would say is bullying too, even if it's not to the level of exposing personal info.
Bullying does not have to include offline information. It often does, though, if the bully finds something out or if you trust the wrong person.

I've experienced it in both forms - and when it involves personal, offline information, why not just call it what it is - stalking? A couple of stalkers followed me here to CFC some years ago, copy/pasted some of my posts on their own blog, and proceeded to twist what I'd said around to the worst possible interpretation and mock it.

They did the same thing when they found me on the Doctor Who forum I admin. I actually considered changing my identity there... except that would be letting them win.

This is THE reason why I will never post photos of myself or my human family members anywhere online. That's just asking for more trouble. And thank goodness I have a few namesakes in Canada. Sure, it's led to a couple of instances of mistaken identity - a really bizarre one once, where some woman accused me of lying when I said I hadn't met her at a poetry symposium in Toronto - in fact I've never been to Ontario. She refused to believe me and kept demanding to know why I was lying. Inconvenient argument, sure - but at least my stalkers don't actually have my photo.

That's the problem with common names sometimes... my stalkers went after somebody on a Babylon 5 forum once, just for having the same username as mine. Thing is, I've never joined any B5 forums. And then there was the time when the owner of another forum (with whom I had a less-than-amicable interaction) decided to toss his own rules about publishing anyone's RL information. He put everything he could find about me out in the open, with a musing, "wouldn't it be fun to pay her a visit?" kind of post along with it. So next thing, someone else warned me that my RL photo was posted there... and when I went to look, I saw that it wasn't me. However, it was an underage high school girl with the same name as me - they'd taken her photo from her blog.

I promptly wrote to the senior admin of that forum and said that unless she took all of that down NOW, I would be informing the RCMP that the owner of an American gaming company was openly advocating stalking a 17-year-old high school girl who had absolutely nothing to do with anything about the goings-on of that forum.
 
It's not that having an accent is bad ; but that having an accent marks you out as "foreign" which can become an obstacle or hurdle to overcome. If you get made fun of for your accent, it's likely that some people, at least, won't take you as seriously as they would someone without the accent.
I had an American having trouble with my accent once suggest that I needed subtitles because I couldn't speak English.

I immediately switched to Gaelic.
 
An Irish person who actually speaks Gaelic? Now that is privilege. :lol:
 
Is it? My maternal grandfather was fully bald by the time he was 30 (and the most awesome dude), so I was ready to suffer the same fate. A year ago, with no sign of that happening, I got tired of the hassle of dealing with my hair and just trim it down to 6mm on a weekly basis now. Got some comments on the different look ("you're going to be so aerodynamic now!") when I first cut it short, but can't say it's perceptibly affected me since then.
We real baldies find that offensive and ostentatious. It is like look, in have all my hair, but i am so cool i dont give it that much importance. :cry:
 
Whatever dawg I got almost nothing on top I still grown it out on my shoulders
 
Do you not believe that things would be even more difficult for a person with all of those characteristics who was black, or gay, or both?
If your house catches fire, it isn't less on fire because you're white. At a certain point, you have to stop treating people as just instances of a statistical trend.
 
So, four guys are standing around talking about religious persecution.

The first guy is an atheist and says "when i was in school we had to say the pledge of allegiance every day, and it mentions god!"
The second guy is also an atheist, and says "that's nothing, these religious freaks keep knocking on my door and when I rudely tell them that only atheists know the truth they are so stupid that they disagree."
The third guy is also an atheist, and says "that's nothing, there was a guy standing on the street corner the other day quoting scripture, and I couldn't help but hear it as I drove by!"
Then the fourth guy looks at the holes in his hands and says "yeah, persecution is terrible, I feel your pain."
 
It's a very short, humorous version of the Grand Inquisitor.
 
If your house catches fire, it isn't less on fire because you're white. At a certain point, you have to stop treating people as just instances of a statistical trend.

No I don't and you can't make me! :p

If your house catches fire and your local fire department has much faster response times because you live in a wealthy neighborhood (socio-economic privilege, but tends to track race), it actually will be less on fire compared to the poor bastard whose house catches fire in a neighborhood nobody cares about.

That such a thought brings one no solace, and would probably anger someone who just had their possessions catch fire, doesn't make it any less true. The point of acknowledging one's privileged place in society shouldn't be about guilt, or about making people feel lucky or fortunate, but rather to bring about recognition that there are millions of people who face totally artificial barriers in life based on the color of their skin and their socio-economic status.

If the fire company will get to my house in 3 minutes, but won't get to the other guy's house for 15 or 20 minutes, then we should all want to make it so the other guy's fire department will get there in as close to 3 minutes as is practicable. You can reduce my privilege without making me any worse off.
 
Last edited:
No I don't and you can't make me! :p

If your house catches fire and your local fire department has much faster response times because you live in a wealthy neighborhood (socio-economic privilege, but tends to track race), it actually will be less on fire compared to the poor bastard whose house catches fire in a neighborhood nobody cares about.

That such a thought brings one no solace, and would probably anger someone who just had their possessions catch fire, doesn't make it any less true. The point of acknowledging one's privileged place in society shouldn't be about guilt, or about making people feel lucky or fortunate, but rather to bring about recognition that there are millions of people who face totally artificial barriers in life based on the color of their skin and their socio-economic status.

If the fire company will get to my house in 3 minutes, but won't get to the other guy's house for 15 or 20 minutes, then we should all want to make it so the other guy's fire department will get there in as close to 3 minutes as is practicable. You can reduce my privilege without making me any worse off.
And then there are fires that are so big that it doesn't matter who is rich and gets service first and who doesn't. There are hundreds of forest fires burning in British Columbia now (province next to mine, to the west). Tens of thousands of people - rich and poor - have been displaced. Whole communities have been burned to the ground, literally. When a wall of fire jumps the highway, creek, or even a whole mountain ridge and you've got 5 minutes to grab your family and hopefully your pets and run for it, your income really doesn't matter. The fire certainly doesn't care if it burns a million-dollar home or a cheap trailer.

The smoke from that fire is causing visibility and breathing problems here in Alberta, too. I'm coughing from it, and I daresay the smoke doesn't care if a wealthy person is also coughing from it, if both of us have respiratory issues.
 
Back
Top Bottom