Thenewwwguy
Deity
the only qualification that mattersOn the other hand, HAT.
the only qualification that mattersOn the other hand, HAT.
You thought you were calling my bluff, but in no particular order except as they occur to me: Byzantium, Bohemia, Brittany, Normandy, Burgundy, Ireland, Wales, Navarre, Gauls, Suebi, Denmark, Iceland, Saami, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Kievan Rus', Austria, Francia led by Charlemagne, Etruria, the Kingdom of the Isles.![]()
Is it? I mean, if there's a second leader who deserves the Macedon treatment I think it's Charlemagne, and Francia certainly feels different from France--much more militant and maybe more of a science/religious focus than a cultural one.Okay, Francia is cheating!
Papal States could be interesting if horrifically controversial.Otherwise damn, I wondered whether your hatred led as far as, say, Lichtenstein, Monaco or Vatican City as civs.
liechtenstein ability: bring a friend: when a war ends, one unit from the enemy can be picked as a friend to bring back from the warOkay, Francia is cheating! Otherwise damn, I wondered whether your hatred led as far as, say, Lichtenstein, Monaco or Vatican City as civs.
I'd take Monaco as long as it's unique infrastructure is the Grand Prix.Okay, Francia is cheating! Otherwise damn, I wondered whether your hatred led as far as, say, Lichtenstein, Monaco or Vatican City as civs.
PRINCIPALITY OF MONACOI'd take Monaco as long as it's unique infrastructure is the Grand Prix.
It gives amenities and tourism except when a worldwide war, or a worldwide pandemic happens.![]()
PRINCIPALITY OF MONACO
Leader: Francesco Grimaldi
LUA: Il Malizia: Religious units can expend charges to break city fortifications or remove Forts.
CUA: Micronation: Can only found or control one city, but that city can work an extra ring of tiles, gains +5 Gold on its starting tile, and can build two extra districts beyond what the population allows.
UI: Monte Carlo Casino: Replaces the Bank, generates +2 Amenities and Tourism equal to its gold generation, doubles your treasury when you enter a Golden or Heroic age, halves your treasury when you enter a Normal Age, and bankrupts you when you enter a Dark Age.
UU: Um......race horse, maybe?
![]()
Indeed. I was being sarcastic.Better turn it to a city-state, with a unique improvement "seaside casino" as the suzerain bonus.
I'd suggest that's a narrowness of perspective on your part, not something distinctive about Italy. Tyre, Sidon, Byblos, Ugarit, Kition, etc. were as distinct as Sparta, Athens, Syracuse, and so forth or Venice, Florence, Genoa, Milan, etc., and the same is true of the Mayan city-states like Palanque, Naranjo, Tikal, and so forth.
Personally speaking, I would love to have more ancient civilizations.Oh, I'd love Etruria!
I wasn't trying to be rude, and I'm sorry if you took it that way. What I meant to suggest was that your personal interest in Italy was making you discount how distinct Phoenician and Maya city-states were--which, again, is every bit as much as Italy or Greece. Yes, popular history may be more familiar with European city-states--that's just the nature of popular history--but that doesn't change the fact that the Phoenician and Maya city-states were very distinct and the information is available to anyone who decides to seek it out. Also, I'd suspect that your average armchair historian is much more prepared to explain what made Athens and Sparta distinct versus Florence and Venice, yet we still only have one Greek civ.And I'd suggest that was a lack of generosity in interpretation on your part, I obviously didn't mean actual distinctness, but that we know generally less about those others in popular history (besides Ancient Greek city states, which I deliberately didn't mention). Florence is seen as a distinct entity far more so than Palenque, and I think that's the important thing. Anyway think of me what you will, but I think saying I have a narrow perspective is a bit rude.
Their language is extremely fragmentary, and they have no leaders--not a good fit for Civilization, sadly. Maybe in Humankind, though.a proper Iberian civilization
TBH a Medieval Welsh civ would be pretty cool.before have 3 of those we also would get Wales
In general, Welsh civ is OK, but ...TBH a Medieval Welsh civ would be pretty cool.![]()
Oh, I completely agree. I just don't think a Medieval Welsh civ belongs in the same category with New Zealand and Texas.In general, Welsh civ is OK, but ...
1- I prefer to have the Irish or Gaulish civ instead.
2- There is a CIV version that dont already have Scotland, that is not the case right now.
You can scoff at me in contempt for making the suggestion but Flanders and Belgium could make fun civs to design and play as.More fun than modern Italy would, at least.
![]()
Papal States could be interesting if horrifically controversial.
Well I can agree with the Welsh not being in the same category as maybe New Zealand.Oh, I completely agree. I just don't think a Medieval Welsh civ belongs in the same category with New Zealand and Texas.![]()
Plus the meme queen was probably a better choice than a pope.I've often thought this would be a very cool way to represent Medieval Italy, but I feel like Georgia's design pretty well overlaps how I'd imagine them being implemented.
i’d hope the leader is sennacherib and is focused on wonder-building, personallyThe "cultured militarist" angle was taken by Alexander's Macedon for Civ 6, what with the civ ability of getting Eurekas and Inspirations from conquered cities in a manner reminiscent of Civ 5's Assyria. If they add Assyria again in VI, they will have to go a different route.