Lord Lakely
Idea Fountain
If Mohandas Gandhi has to appear in every damned iteration to the point of having long-running gags attached to him in game, why not? The choice of civ's that appear seems to retain an arbitrary element to it, even if it's gotten somewhat more methodical. Maybe they should get rid of nations like, not only Canada, but America, Mexico, Brazil, Gran Colombia, Australia, etc. starting in 4000 BC (always kind of weird, as is) and just have a "independence revolution or devolution," mechanic of some sort for far-flung settled areas of overreaching nations far from home in later iterations of the game.
There was nothing random about Canada's inclusion lol. Ed deliberately chose to include them and I believe the reasons he cited were:
1) Canada hadn't been included in Civ before,
2) Firaxis needed a civ specialized in Emergencies to sell their new mechanic
3) Firaxis needed a peaceful civ specialized in Dip (opposed to Hungary, who are a warlike Diplomacy civ)
4) Publicity for the Canadian market
Of those four points, only the last one remains a viable reason for Canada's inclusion in future installments. Canada's continued persistance in Civ 7 and beyond will come to fruition because of pandering (omg don't forget those Canadians!!!) and greed (who will now all buy our game!!), which are reasons I dont sympathize with, if you get my drift.
(I don't mind it with Poland because Poland was a highly important country throughout European history. Poland is a Civ that should always been included, though their inclusion in the base game is a bit iffy.)
Personally, I like Canada in Civ 6, I would not want to see them (or Australia for that matter) take up precious Civilization slots that could've instead gone to a more inspired choice. Georgia, Gran Colombia and Mapuche won't. Neither should Canada.