Possibly I could see them getting a Great Explorer or they could go with the name Great Navigator. The only Portuguese Great Admiral we have in the game is Magellan but he is more famous for serving the Spanish during his circumnavigation trip.
i don’t see the taino this pack game since one of their major cities was added as a city state in the Maya/GC pack. Perhaps in another pack if we get them, or in Civ 7
she was also a temple priestess and good friends with Nefertari. Hands down fits the bill for a Civ 6 leader.Personally, I think Puduhepa would make an amazing leader in Civ 6. She reminds me a lot of Gitarja, in a way. Puduhepa had a lot of political power and influence, not only during the reign of her husband but also during the reign of their son. She was known as a goddess-queen and worked tirelessly to organize and streamline the Hittite religious system. She was also an important diplomat and "wrote" frequent letters to other Mesopotamian monarchs, especially those in Egypt. She also told Ramesses II off for underestimating the influence of Babylon
No, Elizabethan English is a form of Modern English and sounds much more like Modern English than it does any dialect of Middle English (particularly the Northumbrian Middle English Robert the Bruce speaks). It would sound more like stage Irish than RP, though.
Washington's accent was reasonably accurate; Southern accents are quite conservative.
By making them a heavy-handed Dom civ that redistributes population when they raze a city thanks to their Mourning Wars CUA, while on the homefront they get a production and faith bonus from their Granary-replacing longhouses and unpillageable farms that produce extra food thanks to their Three Sisters LUA. Their UU, meanwhile, is a Musketman replacement, because it was gunpowder that made them a superpower. The Cree can complain that conquest is a "European" value, but the Iroquois believe otherwise. Or just ditch Jigonhsasee for Red Jacket, Joseph Brandt, or Cornplanter and get a bonus to alliance points with civilizations at war with your allies and reduced diplomatic penalties for razing cities. The Iroquois were all about maintaining conflicting alliances (like Bismarck) to keep their rivals off kilter, and they were the terrors of every tribe from the Carolinas to Newfoundland, and from the Atlantic Seaboard to the Great Lakes. Many people don't realize that the Sioux, for instance, were an agricultural tribe in the Great Lakes before the Iroquois drove them onto the Plain.
Uh..."peaceful capture" and "Iroquois" do not really belong in the same sentence together.
Sure, the Iroquois adopted a number of tribes, some ravaged by the European settlers (like the Tuscarora--the only ones to get full membership--or the Catawba) and some that they themselves had ravaged (like the Huron), but that's basically what I was suggesting be represented by adding population from razed cities. They were still among the most fierce and aggressive powers in the region; I really don't see them playing at all similarly to Poundmaker's "let's all be friends" agenda.
at least that offers some space for differnrtiation
I think an Italian civ has more of a chance at a peacefully capturing city states.
Seems OP, given a Barbarian Camp is much easier to take than a city. Also some of the tribes the Iroquois warred against were urbanized, like the Huron-Wyandot and the Erie. Not to mention they also warred at various times against the French and English as well.
That was just off the top of my head as it could be a % chance sort of like the Eagle Warrior's ability of converting units into builders.
I don't either. That's why I suggested bonus population from razing cities (which still leaves open the possibility of population from capturing cities for the Assyrians
).Also the magical ability to convert sheep and cattle into horses.I can't believe you called barbarians not urbanized when they clearly have buildings in their outposts and a seemingly high population pumping out all of those units.
I like the idea of a free settler when you conquer a city for Assyria based off of their history of mass deportation, but I'm not sure if that would be OP either.I don't either. That's why I suggested bonus population from razing cities (which still leaves open the possibility of population from capturing cities for the Assyrians
Do they spawn horseman and horse archers in range of sheep and cattle too? I didn't know that.Also the magical ability to convert sheep and cattle into horses.
That was just off the top of my head as it could be a % chance sort of like the Eagle Warrior's ability of converting units into builders.
Alternatively it could deal with tribal villages too. I just don't think annexing city-states is the way to go either if you wanted to recreate an Iroquois Confederacy into a civ ability.
I can't believe you called barbarians not urbanized when they clearly have buildings in their outposts and a seemingly high population pumping out all of those units.
Personally, I think Puduhepa would make an amazing leader in Civ 6. She reminds me a lot of Gitarja, in a way. Puduhepa had a lot of political power and influence, not only during the reign of her husband but also during the reign of their son. She was known as a goddess-queen and worked tirelessly to organize and streamline the Hittite religious system. She was also an important diplomat and "wrote" frequent letters to other Mesopotamian monarchs, especially those in Egypt. She also told Ramesses II off for underestimating the influence of Babylon
the hittites are probably the most requested civ among the history nerd section of their audience, while the more casual section of the audience is the side which has massively asked for civs that Firaxis has actually listened to (i.e. Brazil, Siam, Indonesia, Colombia and now Vietnam, Italy, and to a lesser extent, Afghanistan). Notice how nearly all of the civ’s requested by the greater audience are modern countries?
