Closing ranks: The onset of a clash of civilizations

I have a "Clash of Civilizations" going. The Zulu's just built the statue of Liberty and went Fundy.

Isabella just invaded me with her network of vassal states surrounding me on all sides
 
I'm playing 4. Well, sort of. I was playing it, and I will be playing it again, but I don't have time right now. The invasion thing I described actually happened over the weekend. How will it all turn out? I won't know probably until the weekend after New Years, the next time I anticipate being able to sit at my computer and play.

I think "going fundy" means Broken_Erika is playing 2, though, no?
 
Civ 2 MGE. With my personal soopah-neko mod. In glorious 8-bit colour!
Scroonshet.PNG
 
Actually, Civ isn't the best series in depicting an actual clash of civilizations. Sure, different 'civs' go to war with each other, but the civs function more like individual countries. AFAIK, the closest it gets is the diplomatic bonuses and penalties around having the same religion.

The EU series is better. Still, going on a holy war results in war weariness like any other war, when in reality, it can be a good way to distract the populace from things that make them unhappy.
 
To your first point... All Hail, :bowdown: :king: Dilly Dilly
Tonight's playlist includes Lipps, Inc. and the Sugarhill Hang. So hail that as well.
Sommerswerd said:
As to your second point... yes... again Dilly Dilly :beer:
I posted a long time ago that there are a lot of people who believe conflict is inevitable so they'd better make sure it happens.
I have a "Clash of Civilizations" going. The Zulu's just built the statue of Liberty and went Fundy.
The blacks and liberation, why do they keep insisting on that?
 
You uncultured barbarian! We even have the appropriate smiley: [ptw]
 
That post just cost you 25¢.
 
Back
Top Bottom