TheMeInTeam
If A implies B...
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 27,995
conservatives should also reasonably be fed up with the republican party.
disliking race grifters, alphabet agencies, crt (open racism), enrichment of ccp (modern genocide at scale), gene therapy mandates, human trafficking, fauci, useless policy to "stop gun violence", any mainstream media source (cnn and fox share in being proven liars), politicians gaslighting...these are all things that should in principle be bipartisan.
despite that, some of them are not bipartisan. though some in the list above are fringe/extremist positions comparable to people who are actually neo nazis. most people do not appreciate grooming/trafficking, racism, or genocide. few people you observe in day to day life act consistently with race grifter claims, despite that such grifters would prefer more of their claims being true than less.
alphabet agencies have being doing vile **** and lying to us about it since before most of us were born. these are the same types of people (or same people outright) which saw our involvement with banana republics, questionable behavior in middle east, patriot act etc...what makes anybody think they've turn a leaf and are good actors now? how can this possibly be a "conservative" talking point, rather than a broad opinion?
edit: seeding clouds is actually a thing governments have tried. it is not cost effective, to put it mildly. it "kind of" works in that you can make rain happen sooner (some percent effectiveness can be demonstrably attributed to the seeding effort), but it is completely unworkable at scale.
one of the motivations for cloud seeding was as a means to mess with hurricanes. simply isn't viable. hurricanes are a simple process relative to many things humans do, but the amount of energy and sheer size is enormous. the biggest ones are as large as most us states. good luck "seeding" that.
disliking race grifters, alphabet agencies, crt (open racism), enrichment of ccp (modern genocide at scale), gene therapy mandates, human trafficking, fauci, useless policy to "stop gun violence", any mainstream media source (cnn and fox share in being proven liars), politicians gaslighting...these are all things that should in principle be bipartisan.
despite that, some of them are not bipartisan. though some in the list above are fringe/extremist positions comparable to people who are actually neo nazis. most people do not appreciate grooming/trafficking, racism, or genocide. few people you observe in day to day life act consistently with race grifter claims, despite that such grifters would prefer more of their claims being true than less.
alphabet agencies have being doing vile **** and lying to us about it since before most of us were born. these are the same types of people (or same people outright) which saw our involvement with banana republics, questionable behavior in middle east, patriot act etc...what makes anybody think they've turn a leaf and are good actors now? how can this possibly be a "conservative" talking point, rather than a broad opinion?
edit: seeding clouds is actually a thing governments have tried. it is not cost effective, to put it mildly. it "kind of" works in that you can make rain happen sooner (some percent effectiveness can be demonstrably attributed to the seeding effort), but it is completely unworkable at scale.
one of the motivations for cloud seeding was as a means to mess with hurricanes. simply isn't viable. hurricanes are a simple process relative to many things humans do, but the amount of energy and sheer size is enormous. the biggest ones are as large as most us states. good luck "seeding" that.