Could banning pointy knives reduce crime in long term?

The Last Conformist said:
I carried a knife for a while in junior high precisely because it was verboten.

The moral, I suppose, is that teens are fools.
That's quite true. But I feel there is a difference between kids who carry knives for these reasons, namely to look cool (which I am sure you did :) ) and those who are just hard nuts who want to use these things to see some blood. And I don't accept arguments that some kids are genetically disposed to being keen on the sight of blood. There are other more potent reasons, if this argument is valid anyway.
 
Rambuchan said:
That's quite true. But I feel there is a difference between kids who carry knives for these reasons, namely to look cool (which I am sure you did :) ) and those who are just hard nuts who want to use these things to see some blood.
I think the looking cool motivation can be excluded on the grounds I never let anyone know I carried one, and the seeing blood one on that that every time I drew blood in junior high I used my bare hands.
 
Jeff Yu said:
That IS reasonable. Look at crime statistics for inner city gangs and then compare the number of drive-by stabbings with the number of drive-by shootings.

The point isn't that shootings outnumber stabbings, or that guns are 'worse' than knives, it's that there's a very slippery slope leading from gun control to pointy-knife control, and what happens when you ban knives and they start using sticks? Fortunately, someone's already on the case for preventing drive-by stabbings:
Australia moves on to swords, crossbows...

The banning of one thing after another should either be left alone completely or continued to its logical conclusion, and I don't want to have to pay the tax bill for exporting all of our sticks and stones. ;)
 
Bozo Erectus said:
Well, if the federal government ever becomes a dictatorship, good luck defending your freedoms with shotguns and handguns. Even a bazooka wouldnt be of much use.

Actually, a ragtag bunch of insurgents seem to be giving the World's.Greatest.Military quite a run for it's money. And the insurgents are not nearly as armed as American citizens.

I've said it before, but it is worth repeating: We do not need gun laws if we keep violent people locked up. MOST violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders. These people are incorrigible.
 
The Last Conformist said:
I think the looking cool motivation can be excluded on the grounds I never let anyone know I carried one, and the seeing blood one on that that every time I drew blood in junior high I used my bare hands.
I feel we are dragging this one out but the point I am making is it's a fair more sensible thing to deal with why you ended up needing to 'draw blood' in the first place. 'Conflict resolution' over resolving 'what tools should or shouldn't be used in the conflict' is my offering to the debate.
 
Rambuchan said:
I feel we are dragging this one out but the point I am making is it's a fair more sensible thing to deal with why you ended up needing to 'draw blood' in the first place. 'Conflict resolution' over resolving 'what tools should or shouldn't be used in the conflict' is my offering to the debate.
I find it somewhat flattering that you assume I needed to draw blood.

The simple truth is that I was mobbed, and tended to respond very violently.
 
The Last Conformist said:
I find it somewhat flattering that you assume I needed to draw blood.

The simple truth is that I was mobbed, and tended to respond very violently.
I'm trying to square the images of you on the members photos with you drawing blood and 'responding very violently'. You're absolutely placid in every one of your pics, serene and chilled. You responding violently? :confused:
 
Rambuchan said:
I'm trying to square the images of you on the members photos with you drawing blood and 'responding very violently'. You're absolutely placid in every one of your pics, serene and chilled. You responding violently? :confused:

The ones that don't look dangerous are the most dangerous ones! :mischief:
 
Rambuchan said:
I'm trying to square the images of you on the members photos with you drawing blood and 'responding very violently'. You're absolutely placid in every one of your pics, serene and chilled. You responding violently? :confused:
:lol:

Actually, my looks in one of those photos was described as 'menacing' on another forum. I'll leave you to scratch your head which that might be. :p

You've never seen me angry. Had you, you'd have no trouble visualizing me smashing someone's nose.
 
The Last Conformist said:
:lol:

Actually, my looks in one of those photos was described as 'menacing' on another forum. I'll leave you to scratch your head which that might be. :p

You've never seen me angry. Had you, you'd have no trouble visualizing me smashing someone's nose.
Ok now I'm scared :eek: . I guess I just look for the good in people as much as possible. I am so naive! :rolleyes:
 
The Last Conformist said:
Well, considering we're on opposite sides of the North Sea, I think your nose is pretty safe.

But just to be on the safe side I think you should move to the moon. :D
 
luiz said:
Actually, this year or the next there will be a referendum about banning guns in the nation. I wonder what the point is, since 98.4% of the gun-related crimes are commited with illegal and unregistered guns anyway.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't most of the illegal guns STOLEN from legal owners? If it was harder to obtain guns legaly*, a lot less guns would fall in criminal hands.

* In Norway, it is not forbidden to own weapons. But if you want a gun or a sword/knife with a blade longer than 30cm you need to go to the police to get a license. For the license you will need a good criminal record and you need to document that you have legitimate reasons for it.

Personally I think this system works very well.
 
Double Barrel said:
Actually, a ragtag bunch of insurgents seem to be giving the World's.Greatest.Military quite a run for it's money. And the insurgents are not nearly as armed as American citizens.
Thats true, and dont doubt for a minute that our own violent, homegrown rightwing, extremists are studying the insurgents tactics and taking notes.
 
No one's gonna take my assault knife away from me! I mean er my 'hunting knife.' ;)

I really didn't think the British government would be crazy enough to ban knives but here we are. What next? Cricket and Rounders bats?
 
IglooDude said:
The ones that don't look dangerous are the most dangerous ones! :mischief:

this is very true.

also as far as insurgents go, the US Marines learned in nicaragua ( incidentially where the .45 came from) that a group using "geurilla" tactics, can tie up a force 7-10 X's its size.
And its not hard to get a stolen gun.
Now this is a true story. A friend of mine and I went to a city wich i shall not name. and we were down town. He went one way and i went the other to see who could get a gun "off the street" first. He won. it took him 8 min to buy a glock that had nary a serial number. took me 15 for a .45 colt.
Banning "pionty" knives is stupid.
Maybey we should ban the morons who think up these idiotic ideas... and politicians
 
cidknee said:
Maybey we should ban the morons who think up these idiotic ideas... and politicians
One and the same no?
 
no its usually some moron who thinks it up and a ****** [read politician] says yaay something else to waste taxpayers money on ! make me look like im actually doing some work.
 
Back
Top Bottom