Daedwartin
Emperor
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,785
welll, for one, your better off asking on the paradox forums.
Crusader Kings 2
- Thread starter SouthernKing
- Start date
welll, for one, your better off asking on the paradox forums.
Overall, I'm pretty satisfied with the expansions minus the Aztecs (I have ignored the music and graphics packs, I hate the nickel and diming). The Jewish characters and the loans are adding an interesting mechanic where you can borrow for mercenaries, which has been vital to my survival so far.
I have a game as the Fatimids going from the 1081 start where I have conquered everything south of Egypt and am waiting to strike at the Sunni caliphate when they get weak enough. I also have a game going as the Morosini family of Venice where I have managed to pick off several provinces in Sicily (both the island and the peninsular duchies) and Ragusa. But the other families are stealing my trading posts one-by-one and I can't retaliate, and the Greeks have conquered most of Croatia and have a personal union with Ruthenia which will be brutal to deal with.
mechaerik
Tuturuu!
The video card is of secondary importance. The game is more processor-intensive than graphics-intensive. In addition upgrading the motherboard won't help a whole lot. What's your current processor? More importantly, is the processor compatible with the motherboard?
Murder them. Murder all of them. Murder solves everything. Alliances are just one death away from collapse and you should always kill AI in unions to make rebels go crazy, and patrician families can't take your crap if they're suddenly run by a 10 year old.
cybrxkhan
Asian Xwedodah
Personally my favorite expansions so far have been SoI, the Republic, and SoA - liked them for the flavor and such, SoI I think was the most successful in trying to give a non-Christian group a different feel (for better or worse), Republic and SoA had nice flavor and all htat. LoR was okay and I for whatever reason contrary to everyone else in the PI forums feel that ToG is overrated and a bit of a disappointment especially since it was really just the Viking and-the-other-pagans-get-nothing expansion, and I'm having similar vibes for RoI for some reason.
bonefang
Emperor
My current pc was bought in 2006. It has ONE slot: ram slot.
I intend to get the mobo as well as the graphics card. Can you guys suggest me something that might go for less ? I checked out minimum pc requirements for CK2, the config mentioned there are apparently not available any more in my country.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 9,305
I don't think you can buy a Pentium IV 2.4 GHz and GeForce 8800/ATI Radeon X1900 new in any country these days. Might be able to find it used, though.
mechaerik is right that the CPU is important, though. And indeed, whether it will work with the new motherboard is critical. If you have an Intel CPU, you're really out of luck for getting a 2006 Intel CPU in a new motherboard, even if the motherboard isn't the latest model. You're probably out of luck with AMD, too, but are less guaranteed to be. So what this means is you probably will need to get a new CPU in order to use the new motherboard (and it sounds like a new motherboard is necessary to use a new graphics card). Unfortunately, that means you probably would also need new RAM, since your 2006 RAM is probably DDR2, and any new motherboard would require DDR3.
The lowest-cost motherboard + cpu with integrated graphics + RAM that I can find new (in U.S. online stores) that would likely run Crusader Kings II is the AMD A4 6300 CPU + GPU for $55, a $50 motherboard that is compatible and has non-horrible reviews, and 2 GB of RAM for around $16, which winds up being $111. This would assume that everything else could be re-used, though, which may or may not be the case. Local prices may vary, which could be a good thing - you might get a good motherboard + cpu combo that would bring the price down a bit.
The good news is that buying used may also be an option. My 2007 laptop, which is only slightly newer than your computer, can play Crusader Kings II, albeit barely. The same model is selling on eBay for $120 - $130 shipped on average. So if the goal is playability at the lowest possible cost, you may be better off buying a used computer with sufficient power from the 2008 - 2010 era. Although avoid Intel graphics from that era - they won't be powerful enough. Buy a used computer that can play it for $175 (since you probably want something slightly more powerful than my old laptop, since its GPU is actually below the minimum specs even though it does work), sell your current one for $75, and you're at a lower total cost and probably more power than a few upgrades.
The other good news is that Europa Universalis IV has the same requirements as CKII, so if you can play one, you ought to be able to play the other. I haven't tried EUIV on my barely-able-to-play-CKII laptop, but theoretically it should work.
But if you do want to upgrade, the CPU model is really needed to know what's possible, and other specifications if possible.
mechaerik is right that the CPU is important, though. And indeed, whether it will work with the new motherboard is critical. If you have an Intel CPU, you're really out of luck for getting a 2006 Intel CPU in a new motherboard, even if the motherboard isn't the latest model. You're probably out of luck with AMD, too, but are less guaranteed to be. So what this means is you probably will need to get a new CPU in order to use the new motherboard (and it sounds like a new motherboard is necessary to use a new graphics card). Unfortunately, that means you probably would also need new RAM, since your 2006 RAM is probably DDR2, and any new motherboard would require DDR3.
The lowest-cost motherboard + cpu with integrated graphics + RAM that I can find new (in U.S. online stores) that would likely run Crusader Kings II is the AMD A4 6300 CPU + GPU for $55, a $50 motherboard that is compatible and has non-horrible reviews, and 2 GB of RAM for around $16, which winds up being $111. This would assume that everything else could be re-used, though, which may or may not be the case. Local prices may vary, which could be a good thing - you might get a good motherboard + cpu combo that would bring the price down a bit.
The good news is that buying used may also be an option. My 2007 laptop, which is only slightly newer than your computer, can play Crusader Kings II, albeit barely. The same model is selling on eBay for $120 - $130 shipped on average. So if the goal is playability at the lowest possible cost, you may be better off buying a used computer with sufficient power from the 2008 - 2010 era. Although avoid Intel graphics from that era - they won't be powerful enough. Buy a used computer that can play it for $175 (since you probably want something slightly more powerful than my old laptop, since its GPU is actually below the minimum specs even though it does work), sell your current one for $75, and you're at a lower total cost and probably more power than a few upgrades.
The other good news is that Europa Universalis IV has the same requirements as CKII, so if you can play one, you ought to be able to play the other. I haven't tried EUIV on my barely-able-to-play-CKII laptop, but theoretically it should work.
But if you do want to upgrade, the CPU model is really needed to know what's possible, and other specifications if possible.
bonefang
Emperor
Thanks for the comments Quintillus. If I am investing for a PC, i think i will go with a something that can play some games for another 4-5 years at least.
I am getting these stuff at flipkart.com, a local online vendor at slightly lower prices. Thanks guys
I am getting these stuff at flipkart.com, a local online vendor at slightly lower prices. Thanks guys
You can get a brand new Pentium for $69 or so from Amazon. Clocked right up with current models (3+ GHz) with a generation or two lag behind the i-Core models. Basically a single-core i3 with no HT.
Pretty solid choice if you're on a tight budget, although going above $100 is highly recommended for a $110 FX6350 or $120 i3 (far better than the FX model for single-core applications).
Of course all of these are US-centric stuff I'm familiar with, your choices might be different.
Pretty solid choice if you're on a tight budget, although going above $100 is highly recommended for a $110 FX6350 or $120 i3 (far better than the FX model for single-core applications).
Of course all of these are US-centric stuff I'm familiar with, your choices might be different.
Daedwartin
Emperor
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,785
also...i find the megawar system sucks on GOT mod.
Dorne i had to reconquer because it wouldnt decide to come back in after the conquest of Westros.
Also, Dragons OP. NERF NOW.
Dorne i had to reconquer because it wouldnt decide to come back in after the conquest of Westros.
Also, Dragons OP. NERF NOW.
also...i find the megawar system sucks on GOT mod.
Dorne i had to reconquer because it wouldnt decide to come back in after the conquest of Westros.
Also, Dragons OP. NERF NOW.
The biggest problem is that mega wars messes up complitely factions and plots. Also you need to constantly micromanage vassals because they change master all the time.
Okay, my Scotland game has gotten... weird. I have had a crazy king ironically named Murdoch and an heir assassinated under strange circumstances, can't figure out where the assassinations are coming from. It wasn't the hellspawn devil bastard daughter, she died nearly a century ago.
Also, the East Roman Empire converted to Catholicism. But they have an anti-pope because they really hate the two popes in Rome. Oh yeah, that deserves some explanation. The Pope has an anti-pope, who is the bastard child of a former pope and is serving as his marshal.
I swear, I'm not making this up. King David II must persevere!
EDIT: Screenshot for partial proof:
Also, the East Roman Empire converted to Catholicism. But they have an anti-pope because they really hate the two popes in Rome. Oh yeah, that deserves some explanation. The Pope has an anti-pope, who is the bastard child of a former pope and is serving as his marshal.
I swear, I'm not making this up. King David II must persevere!
EDIT: Screenshot for partial proof:
Spoiler :
Attachments
cybrxkhan
Asian Xwedodah
@Antilogic: Meh, I've seen weirder in CKII, and much of it not mods. 
I've never seen the pope have an anti-pope before, that one is new. Although sadly he inherited or was granted some temple in Latium, so there are no longer two popes in Rome.
I have secured Scotland, Ireland, and part of the Duchy of Ornkey although for some reason my firstborn son with the duchess there is not the heir (it's his sister, and they have regular primogeniture as their succession law so I'm a bit confused). I also have Andalusia (just the Duchies of Sevilla and Granada) from a crusade, although I skipped the last two because I thought they were doomed to failure.
Spain looks fairly historical--Navarre, Aragon, Castille (when Badajoz & friends aren't in revolt), and Portugal all have roughly recognizable borders with me in the south. The HRE is fairly regular-looking, and the East Romans have held their borders and taken Sicily. Everything from Croatia to Poland has been annexed into the Empire of Carpathia run by the Hautevilles, so those borders look decent as well. The only big mess is in France right now: the Kings of France and Aquitaine each have scattered exclaves that are constantly in revolt, I think Toulouse is permanently independent now, the Duchy of Brittany is part of Castille, and the English still have a foothold in Normandy.
I have secured Scotland, Ireland, and part of the Duchy of Ornkey although for some reason my firstborn son with the duchess there is not the heir (it's his sister, and they have regular primogeniture as their succession law so I'm a bit confused). I also have Andalusia (just the Duchies of Sevilla and Granada) from a crusade, although I skipped the last two because I thought they were doomed to failure.
Spain looks fairly historical--Navarre, Aragon, Castille (when Badajoz & friends aren't in revolt), and Portugal all have roughly recognizable borders with me in the south. The HRE is fairly regular-looking, and the East Romans have held their borders and taken Sicily. Everything from Croatia to Poland has been annexed into the Empire of Carpathia run by the Hautevilles, so those borders look decent as well. The only big mess is in France right now: the Kings of France and Aquitaine each have scattered exclaves that are constantly in revolt, I think Toulouse is permanently independent now, the Duchy of Brittany is part of Castille, and the English still have a foothold in Normandy.
Similar threads
