Current (SVN) development discussion thread
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
Looking at the save, my suspicions seem to have been confirmed. That's the population (after modifiers) broken down by tile stability type:
Core: 154
Historical: 125
Contested: 71
Foreign: 16
Foreign Core: 42
Which means that currently the core isn't capable of supporting the historical + contested territories, which isn't desired.
Edit: I have to retract that, further research revealed that all of your cities have a modifier of 1 except Palembang. So it's just the plain population. I'm currently unsure whether this is mainly because the Dutch core is so small.
I saw it, but you also have a point there about autorazing. It shouldn't give you a penalty.
As prompt response, a new commit:
- changed population modifiers for periphery population to a percentage based system to soften their impact
- civs with only one city in their core receive extra core population
I decided to leave the rest of the mechanic unchanged for now. 1700 AD Netherlands might not be the best litmus test because the negative modifiers for foreign culture and different original owners (e.g. in Indonesia) aren't present.
- changed population modifiers for periphery population to a percentage based system to soften their impact
- civs with only one city in their core receive extra core population
I decided to leave the rest of the mechanic unchanged for now. 1700 AD Netherlands might not be the best litmus test because the negative modifiers for foreign culture and different original owners (e.g. in Indonesia) aren't present.
Another commit:
- Barbarians cannot spawn on cities anymore
- Barbarians cannot spawn on cities anymore
(iEra - 1) * iPopulation. It applies to everyone with only one core city, not just the Netherlands specifically.
Even more commits:
- fixed the raze penalty so that it is now lower for small cities as intended
(I won't bother to create an extra exception for autorazed cities since their penalty will now be very small anyway.)
- fixed the raze penalty so that it is now lower for small cities as intended
(I won't bother to create an extra exception for autorazed cities since their penalty will now be very small anyway.)
I don't know, did it say so in the commit notes?
The Diocletian
Fire Fly
Why not just get rid of the autoraze mechanic? I don't really see why Firaxis wanted it in the game anyhow.
Akbarthegreat
Angel of Junil
It didn't make much of a difference in BtS, since there was no penalty for razing. Though I agree that the mechanic should be removed.
Niceboat
Chieftain
It's very kind of you. Thanks a lot.
What they want to voice is the Russian ought to be strong after finding communism, rather than original superior geographical environment(changes about the Caucasus and the Astrakhan).this advantages are more obvious when starting at AD600.
It's my mistake, monarch, instead of king. They have the same Chinese characters as usual...
Niceboat
Chieftain
Oh...My poor foreign language. I feel terribly guilty owing the junior teachers too much.- -.
The content of those quotes is just express that there are a lot of people cares deeply about Doc in somewhere away from your sight. And those talks have not been careful selected. So relax.
And we are all respect your work. Vielen Dank. We will keep mum and have reservations if you say NO.
The content of those quotes is just express that there are a lot of people cares deeply about Doc in somewhere away from your sight. And those talks have not been careful selected. So relax.
And we are all respect your work. Vielen Dank. We will keep mum and have reservations if you say NO.
I think Russia should start to become earlier, since it was a considerable power from at least Peter the Great's time onwards. Maybe not the scoreboard leader for Europe though, so you're right on that count.
Please don't be silent, that would be the worst thing to do. I'm always willing to listen to you, just don't always expect a positive response.
I just downloaded SVN and it really looks very promising. Game is faster, and new stability system have a lot of potential, really like where it going.
I noticed two bugs.
Every turn there is error message:
This message appears from turn one, for every game, no matter what, only code (0x48...) is different depending of civ played (this one is for Egypt, it was different when I played Poland etc.) Aside from that, it worked smoothly...
Also, using stability cheat (ALT+SHIFT+S) now removes interior advisor screen, it is only empty background after using it. Working fine if you don't use cheat. Not really a big deal anyway...
It is version 682.
I noticed two bugs.
Every turn there is error message:
Spoiler :
This message appears from turn one, for every game, no matter what, only code (0x48...) is different depending of civ played (this one is for Egypt, it was different when I played Poland etc.) Aside from that, it worked smoothly...
Also, using stability cheat (ALT+SHIFT+S) now removes interior advisor screen, it is only empty background after using it. Working fine if you don't use cheat. Not really a big deal anyway...
It is version 682.
ezzlar
Emperor
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Messages
- 1,842
Many cities can be starved by pillaging or have some troops fortify relevant food squares. But since the penalty is temporary it might not make such big difference that you can starve down your penalty. Might as well raze now and let the penalty expire instead of waiting 5-10 turns to starve down the city.
Yeah, the BUG mod displays this error message and I cannot identify why. But it doesn't seem like there is actually a bug.
The cheat doesn't work anymore because the stability score isn't saved in the new system. Maybe I can include a new cheat that increases your stability level instead, or makes you immune to the next crisis.
That's true, but I don't think I can do anything against that without becoming too elaborate. I guess if you want to make that kind of effort you can also be rewarded with a weaker stability hit.
strijder20
Wallowing in irony
The row of tiles 1 south of England are currently under French dominance. By which I mean if England has 66% culture in them and France 33% they will be French. Any chance you could make them neutral or even reverse it (It's the English channel after all)?
