Anyone who believes the "science is settled" rubbish, doesn't know science at all.
This is exactly why you're not worth the effort of debating for anyone who knows anything about the subject.
Anyone who believes the "science is settled" rubbish, doesn't know science at all.
That is absolutely laughable.
Just because we had a snowstorm here today and I'm cold, should I decide that global warming is nonsense?Nope. This one is done, crossed off, we know pretty much exactly what is happening.
People are welcome to try and disprove it, and I wish them all the luck in the world, but only if they come at it from an actual science background. You can't of course, because literally all the data agrees on this one, but that's beside the point.
Pundits, and people cherry picking dates to say "oh ho ho, the Earth isn't warming after all" are just regular old idiots who aren't contributing anything to the discussion, and we shouldn't put up with them.
Then suppose you explain it to us, using proper scientific terminology, 'k?That is absolutely laughable.
What does philosophy have to do with this? Whether you call it global warming or climate change, it's all observable and measurable. Philosophy need not apply here.Go ahead. Lets here why GW is all a crock, because philosophically it's impossible to know whether we are really correct.
What does philosophy have to do with this? Whether you call it global warming or climate change, it's all observable and measurable. Philosophy need not apply here.
Anyone who believes the "science is settled" rubbish, doesn't know science at all.
I can't say I blame him. When Sun Media comes by, they're not interested in any sort of real journalism.