Why not?
Sorry, YOU lose. Your whole party lose.
erm, no. In this particular debate, I gave my side of the issue validation...you did not.
But feel free to continue to stamp your feet and chant otherwise. It can be rather entertaining.
You weigh your argument against some Republican Propaganda tripe. *Pfft*. You may "think" you are a prophet of "common sense". It does not give you the right to insult people.
You called yourself names...not me. And again, please refrain from calling the story 'republican propaganda tripe' with no factual evidence to back up that claim.
So long as the evil Republicans are kept out of power, I dont care.
Tsk, tsk civg....judging your fellow man like that. WWJD?
Regardless of what you think. It's not my money when it gets into the hands of Uncle Sam.
No, actually it is. Even then. In fact, as proof, I submit the money I got BACK from the government as a result of GWBs tax reform. They had it, but gave it back to me.
Foot stamping. Please continue.
I'm refering to the Mark Foley scandal.
What law was broken? Has anyone been charged or convicted in that? Anyone in jail?
The only thing I would care that GWB was spending (BTW, Its NOT the President who decides where the money goes, its the CONGRESS!) are education and Social Programs for the less fortunate.
/cue Tony Montoya voice "Say hello to my little friend VETO." /uncue voice.
Thats why I dispise the Republicans for going into his personal life. And if he was impeached, how did he managed to stay in office?
His personal life? He lied under oath. Thats what he was impeached for. As for staying in office, impeachment does not automatically equate to losing the office.
Do I need to forward you that they later found out that the war is a MISTAKE and REGRETTED IT?! I dont focus on which Democrat voted for or against. I only aim at the Republican Party because it was Bush who was the ring leader.
Rofl, so you excuse the then pro-war dems who were merely pro-war because it was politically expedient to do so....then change their tune when things got tough. Got it.
I am knowledgeable of factual data, just not from the Republican Party and Republican influenced organizations.
Uhm....nope.
I well understand what you are "trying to talking about", but to be frank, I just dont trust your sources.
At least I have sources. You have none. Not a single source to counter what I linked to. Face it, CG...you are again in denial of the stories facts and are at a total loss to give ANY factual refutation in the form of a link.
To continue to deny this is just more hot wind from your direction.
Give me some good olde Democratic and Liberal media any day. Dont expect me to digest any Republican filth.
I challenge you to prove that the link I provided is just more 'republican filth'. I also challenge you to provide a link that refutes my link. Put up or shut up.
First of all, I am not a young person almost to my mid 20s. I don't appreciate being talked to like if I was a teenager.
Not understanding something has nothing to do with age. I have had to talk that way to NCOs in their mid 50s that have a hard time understanding things. Again, why do you equate having to explain something to someone like that as being ******** or young?
ff said:
I mean you defended Ted Hagget, Mark Foley, Rumsfield, Halliburton, hell you even defend the 8.8 Billion in unaccounted for Iraq money.
You misrepresent me. Flat out. Stop trying to obfuscate the debate at hand with your misrepresentations.