Dem lead congress is making improvements...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, unlike you, I can acknowledge that I'm a human being, and I make mistakes. It feels nice, because everyone's wrong in a while, but it takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Yeah, but it takes a better man to not make any...:p

But I admit it......I make mistakes too....and I even admit to them. Not often, but I do.
 
Can I put the above quote in my sig for its humor value?
No you may not.

Again...what part of 'proof please' do you not understand? Verbal denial on your part just isnt good enough...how about a link. No link? You lose.
Sorry, YOU lose. Your whole party lose.


Nope. I win the arguement 1 link to none.:lol:
You weigh your argument against some Republican Propaganda tripe. *Pfft*. You may "think" you are a prophet of "common sense". It does not give you the right to insult people.

You dont care how corrupt, spendy, abusive, lawbreaking your party might be as long as it keeps Republicans out of power?
So long as the evil Republicans are kept out of power, I dont care.

Totally incorrect...its YOUR money..and mine, and everyone elses. Not theirs.
Regardless of what you think. It's not my money when it gets into the hands of Uncle Sam.


Are you referring to the Barney Frank sex scandal? Which one?
I'm refering to the Mark Foley scandal.

So, if we were not in Iraq, you wouldnt care how much money GWB was spending?
The only thing I would care that GWB was spending (BTW, Its NOT the President who decides where the money goes, its the CONGRESS!) are education and Social Programs for the less fortunate.


They didnt 'try' to impeach Clinton...they DID.
Thats why I dispise the Republicans for going into his personal life. And if he was impeached, how did he managed to stay in office?

Also, do I need to forward you all the names of the DEMOCRATS that voted in FAVOR of the war in Iraq?
Do I need to forward you that they later found out that the war is a MISTAKE and REGRETTED IT?! I dont focus on which Democrat voted for or against. I only aim at the Republican Party because it was Bush who was the ring leader.

Perhaps if you were more knowledgable of actual factual data you wouldnt be so hateful of the republican party.
I am knowledgeable of factual data, just not from the Republican Party and Republican influenced organizations.

:deadhorse:

I am talking to you like a person that doesnt understand what I mean.
I well understand what you are "trying to talking about", but to be frank, I just dont trust your sources. Give me some good olde Democratic and Liberal media any day. Dont expect me to digest any Republican filth.

I work with a good many young people who are not ******** that still need to be spoken to slowly and clearly. Are you saying people with short attention spans are ********?
First of all, I am not a young person almost to my mid 20s. I don't appreciate being talked to like if I was a teenager.
 
Its not propaganda for the love of god.
 
Instead of trying to worm out of the association of Democrats and pork, why don't some of you "but you guys did it too" join me in one big condemnation of it all.

~Chris

See, I don't know what's so hard about that. You're right, maybe even 100%. (I reserve judgement, because there have been enough times that I've seen what was assumed to be a 'junket' turn out to be an actually-viable trip).
 
Please...for once, stop being in denial. The source is just fine. The story, true. You basically sticking your head in the sand to ignore it doesnt change the facts surrounding it..

:lol:

Comeon.
I mean you defended Ted Hagget, Mark Foley, Rumsfield, Halliburton, hell you even defend the 8.8 Billion in unaccounted for Iraq money.

And you were worried over basketball tickets.

/blah

EDIT: I see your junket scandle and raise you 5 million deleted emails, one atterony general. One head of world bank and hes lover, one military czar position vacant.
 
No you may not.

Why not?

Sorry, YOU lose. Your whole party lose.

erm, no. In this particular debate, I gave my side of the issue validation...you did not.

But feel free to continue to stamp your feet and chant otherwise. It can be rather entertaining.

You weigh your argument against some Republican Propaganda tripe. *Pfft*. You may "think" you are a prophet of "common sense". It does not give you the right to insult people.

You called yourself names...not me. And again, please refrain from calling the story 'republican propaganda tripe' with no factual evidence to back up that claim.

So long as the evil Republicans are kept out of power, I dont care.

Tsk, tsk civg....judging your fellow man like that. WWJD?

Regardless of what you think. It's not my money when it gets into the hands of Uncle Sam.

No, actually it is. Even then. In fact, as proof, I submit the money I got BACK from the government as a result of GWBs tax reform. They had it, but gave it back to me.

Foot stamping. Please continue.

I'm refering to the Mark Foley scandal.

What law was broken? Has anyone been charged or convicted in that? Anyone in jail?

The only thing I would care that GWB was spending (BTW, Its NOT the President who decides where the money goes, its the CONGRESS!) are education and Social Programs for the less fortunate.

/cue Tony Montoya voice "Say hello to my little friend VETO." /uncue voice.

Thats why I dispise the Republicans for going into his personal life. And if he was impeached, how did he managed to stay in office?

His personal life? He lied under oath. Thats what he was impeached for. As for staying in office, impeachment does not automatically equate to losing the office.

Do I need to forward you that they later found out that the war is a MISTAKE and REGRETTED IT?! I dont focus on which Democrat voted for or against. I only aim at the Republican Party because it was Bush who was the ring leader.

Rofl, so you excuse the then pro-war dems who were merely pro-war because it was politically expedient to do so....then change their tune when things got tough. Got it.

I am knowledgeable of factual data, just not from the Republican Party and Republican influenced organizations.

Uhm....nope.

I well understand what you are "trying to talking about", but to be frank, I just dont trust your sources.

At least I have sources. You have none. Not a single source to counter what I linked to. Face it, CG...you are again in denial of the stories facts and are at a total loss to give ANY factual refutation in the form of a link.

To continue to deny this is just more hot wind from your direction.

Give me some good olde Democratic and Liberal media any day. Dont expect me to digest any Republican filth.

I challenge you to prove that the link I provided is just more 'republican filth'. I also challenge you to provide a link that refutes my link. Put up or shut up.

First of all, I am not a young person almost to my mid 20s. I don't appreciate being talked to like if I was a teenager.

Not understanding something has nothing to do with age. I have had to talk that way to NCOs in their mid 50s that have a hard time understanding things. Again, why do you equate having to explain something to someone like that as being ******** or young?

ff said:
I mean you defended Ted Hagget, Mark Foley, Rumsfield, Halliburton, hell you even defend the 8.8 Billion in unaccounted for Iraq money.

You misrepresent me. Flat out. Stop trying to obfuscate the debate at hand with your misrepresentations.
 
No, actually it is. Even then. In fact, as proof, I submit the money I got BACK from the government as a result of GWBs tax reform. They had it, but gave it back to me.
Well I don't get any back. As for Bush's tax reform, I don't like it. I don't know what it's about, but I don't like anything that Bush touches.

What law was broken? Has anyone been charged or convicted in that? Anyone in jail?
It was the pivotal point that caused the downfall of the Republican party. That event, IMO, caused many of the Christian voters away from the Republican Party because of that scandal. What law was broken? Well isint it against the law to make sexual advances to children anyway? Has anyone been charged or convicted? and Anyone in Jail? I dont know and I believe that the guy should be charged, convicted and thrown in jail.

/cue Tony Montoya voice "Say hello to my little friend VETO." /uncue voice.
Ever heard of a little thing called the 2/3rds override?

His personal life? He lied under oath. Thats what he was impeached for. As for staying in office, impeachment does not automatically equate to losing the office.
I don't care if he lied under oath, I dont see anything wrong on what he did. besides, his personal life should remain personal.

Rofl, so you excuse the then pro-war dems who were merely pro-war because it was politically expedient to do so....then change their tune when things got tough. Got it.
I don't exactly excuse the Pro-war Democrats, I still hold the incumbents under much scrutiny.

At least I have sources. You have none. Not a single source to counter what I linked to. Face it, CG...you are again in denial of the stories facts and are at a total loss to give ANY factual refutation in the form of a link.
Once again youre being arrogant with me and I dont take too kindly to arrogance. Stating that I am "in denial" does not realy help your cause in convincing me to accept your article.

I challenge you to prove that the link I provided is just more 'republican filth'. I also challenge you to provide a link that refutes my link.
I will admit that, I cannot find any refuting links.

Put up or shut up.
Quite Christian like for you to tell people to shut up :rolleyes:. Just makes me believe that you just have an arrogant attitude.

You get more beas with honey than you can with vinager.

Not understanding something has nothing to do with age. I have had to talk that way to NCOs in their mid 50s that have a hard time understanding things. Again, why do you equate having to explain something to someone like that as being ******** or young?
Yes, becasue I dont need things explained to me. Plus your attitude as of late with "stamping" feet and "beating down your opponent" does not help.

However, dispite your harshness and arrogance, I'll take a look at this article that you have presented. Once I determane that it is not "Republican propaganda tripe" and that it's non-biased. I will start over with the debate starting with the first questions you presented to me earlyer.

Deal?
 
Looks to me they are doing even more of what they took the republicans to task for.
Close, they are doing exacly the same. Two sides on high horses shouting down at each other. Politics is swell isn't it? Anyone who claims their side is a little less hypocrit is being, well, hypocrit, but hey, that's politics. God I love politics. Can I have mine with a side-dish of garlic to get rid of the stink and a glass of petrol to get rid of the taste please?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom