One word: So?One word: Vikings.
I think you answered that yourself.One word: So?
Shurdus said:Being from Holland myself, I would still say a bunch of Vikings speaks more to the imagination that a seafaring trading nation that got rich of slave trading.
Calling the Danes "the Vikings" would be like calling the Americans "the Marines"
Viking is actually a verb in Danish. "Hey Bob, I just Vikinged Frank's House". It, as you would expect, means plundering.
Damn it! They chose Denmark.There's sort of a rivalry that's always been going on between Sweden (where I'm from) and Denmark regarding which country was the most powerful at its respective height of power. Sweden was the most powerful nation of the two during the 17th century, while Denmark was the stronger of the two during the 15-16th century.
![]()
One might similarly argue the Greece should be split into Athens, Sparta, Macedonia, the Selucids, etc ... but that only really makes sense in a scenario specific to that time and geographic area. On the grand timeline and grand scale that civ is portraying, tying Tonga, Samoa, New Zealand, and Hawaii together is the only really sensible approach IMO.