While proper leftists would disown me, I have much more in common with them than the right.
While proper leftists would disown me, I have much more in common with them than the right.
While proper leftists would disown me, I have much more in common with them than the right.
Leftists disowning leftists?
Well, I never...
Based on political compass scores. I'm rather authoritarian compared to my peers here and somewhat free-market oriented.
Oruc said:Then we want the same thing, but you've clearly back the wrong horse.
That's pretty funny. Tell us more about how the side that wants more freedom for gay people, more freedom for women, and more freedom for atheists are the authoritarian ones.
While proper leftists would disown me, I have much more in common with them than the right.
People who proclaim themselves to be "proper leftists" are generally abusive authoritarians. Do not let them get away with defining anything.
The Finkelstein Enquiry in Australia is the Left's attempt to stymie Free Speech in Australia. http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/independent_media_inquiry/ It is really scary some things proposed.
Who are we talking about here, anyway? Closest I can think of these days is left-wing social democrats who object to the direction taken by right-socdems towards social liberalism, and generalising a bit they don't seem any more abusive or authoritarian than those they criticise. (Of course, arguably they're all abusive authoritarians, but I doubt that's really what you meant.)People who proclaim themselves to be "proper leftists" are generally abusive authoritarians. Do not let them get away with defining anything.
Can you give a list of the scariest things proposed?The Finkelstein Enquiry in Australia is the Left's attempt to stymie Free Speech in Australia. http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/independent_media_inquiry/ It is really scary some things proposed.
I consider "Left" to mean "caring about disadvantaged people", while "Right" means something like "every man for himself". I find this works a lot better than trying to define it along the axes people typically use. And I think that, secretly, most people define Left and Right in this way anyway, even if they don't know it yet. On this basis I'm on the Left.
If you go by the more "traditional" axes, then it becomes more complicated (and less useful). I really just believe in Liberalism, which happens to put me on the left in most arguments, and on the "right" in others.
Who are we talking about here, anyway? Closest I can think of these days is left-wing social democrats who object to the direction taken by right-socdems towards social liberalism, and generalising a bit they don't seem any more abusive or authoritarian than those they criticise. (Of course, arguably they're all abusive authoritarians, but I doubt that's really what you meant.)
I don't really agree with this, though that is sometimes the case...I consider "Left" to mean "caring about disadvantaged people", while "Right" means something like "every man for himself". I find this works a lot better than trying to define it along the axes people typically use. And I think that, secretly, most people define Left and Right in this way anyway, even if they don't know it yet. On this basis I'm on the Left.
If you go by the more "traditional" axes, then it becomes more complicated (and less useful). I really just believe in Liberalism, which happens to put me on the left in most arguments, and on the "right" in others.