So there really are legit scientists who sit around guessing about when they should move the clock up? Really? In that case, sign me up!I'm surprised at the level of mockery here ? These guys aren't making millions hoodwinking people , it doesn't seem ego driven , it's not done under the guise of some pseudo science.
I'm surprised at the level of mockery here ? These guys aren't making millions hoodwinking people , it doesn't seem ego driven , it's not done under the guise of some pseudo science .
Facts are , nukes suck . Older posters will remember cold war times when the spectre of nuclear war was a big deal ( yes , I know people will say it was all front and never going to happen . Well it definitely won't without the actual weapons) .
Now , without the Cold War the fact that there are thousands of nukes in the hands of numerous nations just doesn't seem to be a big deal . Well it is a big deal , and having these guys out there pricking our conscious from time to time IMHO can only be seen as a positive
It's like spinning dinner plates. Spinning one (nuclear weapons) isn't too tough. We've mastered it. But soon available is bioterror.
So there really are legit scientists who sit around guessing about when they should move the clock up? Really? In that case, sign me up!![]()
Thanks, will check that out when I'm done with the video I'm currently watching (well watching in chunks when I have time).As Slavoj Zizek says, we are very much "living in the end times". The question he poses, and a very worthy one, is what it is that actually ends- human civilisation full step, or our contemporary models of it? Perhaps not everyone will follow the thinking of a "communist in a qualified sense", but he at the very least raises some interesting points for consideration.
Link to video.
They are looking at it from the wrong perspective. If everybody has nukes there'll be no war because everybody can fight back with nukes.
I understand the whole "clock" thing is so that people can better visualize the closeness to destruction, but at the same time there should be explanations as well as explanations of similar situations in the past (or at the very least why the current situation is entirely unique).
Eh, the bars don't close until 2.
But if we outlaw nukes only rogue states will have them !
My major problem with this is not that there isn't good arguments to made in their favor, but that it seems rather arbitrary.
I understand the whole "clock" thing is so that people can better visualize the closeness to destruction, but at the same time there should be explanations as well as explanations of similar situations in the past (or at the very least why the current situation is entirely unique). It just seems somewhat one-sided and more like a scare tactic rather than an attempt at discussion.
We still can wipe out all of humanity if we want to, but there are powerful deterrents to stopping that from happening.
They have nothing to base their guesses off of. "Oh, I just swatted a fly! Better move that clock up another minute!"I don't think it takes a lot of their time.
But I guess unless you're in business and you're at your job 24/7, you're always going to be a slacker who doesn't deserve his pay. Or something.
Um, yeah saying that people are trying to find new energy doesn't mean "scientists" can predict when the world is going to end. In that case: I'm going to eat lentil soup for lunch, so we better move that clock up 7 minutes.The reasons are given in the OP itself. If only you could read.
Um, yeah saying that people are trying to find new energy doesn't mean "scientists" can predict when the world is going to end. In that case: I'm going to eat lentil soup for lunch, so we better move that clock up 7 minutes.