amadeus
Bishop of Bio-Dome
The problem with this thread is that I think a lot of people are hung up on the price of the gold today versus the liquor today. What if instead of one gold coin, it was a hundred gold coins? A thousand? Ten thousand?
The problem with this thread is that I think a lot of people are hung up on the price of the gold today versus the liquor today. What if instead of one gold coin, it was a hundred gold coins? A thousand? Ten thousand?
The problem with this thread is that I think a lot of people are hung up on the price of the gold today versus the liquor today. What if instead of one gold coin, it was a hundred gold coins? A thousand? Ten thousand?
What's doomsday? What event could possibly be so bad that there would be no hope of recovery?
Are you the government?Sounds fine and dandy for the people living inside the community.
Say I live outside the community and I want your house, I can just come in and take it. What with nothing to protect you but yourself, my army will have little obstacle in taking over the place and enslaving you or something.
It's still a good unit of account, medium of exchange and a store of value. Why wouldn't it be used? Especially if the perceived value of fiat money was decimated in the process.Well, you also have to factor in some other things, mainly the fact that although gold is seen as valuable today, it might not be in the future, considering how useless a metal it would be in a post-apocalyptic society.
What I meant was that some people were saying that because the bottles of liquor at their present market price are worth more than the single coin, they chose the liquor. It didn't really answer the question of: would, in some kind of post-doomsday society, liquor be a better medium of exchange than gold?I think the point is that for one ounce of gold, you can buy a hundred bottles of decent (JD) liquor. So if you up it to a hundred gold coins, then we're talking 10,000 bottles of liquor. Obviously that's verging on impractical to store.*
I'd take the gold, not because of its usefulness but because I'm not a rural-type person.So then at ten thousand ounces of gold ($16.5m), would you prefer the gold or would you prefer to buy something else like a rural farm that you could then build up into a defensible position, buy a cache of weapons and ammunition and buy up the ability to work the land?
Not really. I can't conceive of why people would not want, in the event of a catastrophe, to rebuild and restart our industries. Why do you think there could be such a thing? What would cause people to want to become subsistence farmers?Can you really not think of any such event?
Not really. I can't conceive of why people would not want, in the event of a catastrophe, to rebuild and restart our industries. Why do you think there could be such a thing? What would cause people to want to become subsistence farmers?
Are you the government?
It's still a good unit of account, medium of exchange and a store of value. Why wouldn't it be used? Especially if the perceived value of fiat money was decimated in the process.
Just try it.I will be once I take over your idyllic little town.
Just try it.
On a separate, but relevant, issue... I really don't understand why statists have this need to glorify war and use it as some of refutation of decent folk.
Still curious how one raises children in an anarchistic society.
Ummm. One gets married, then pregnant. Then "one" and her husband bring them up, Why does this need pointing out?
Ummm. One gets married, then pregnant. Then "one" and her husband bring them up, Why does this need pointing out?