Eric Hobsbawm dies at 95

Agent327

Observer
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
16,102
Location
In orbit
Historian Eric Hobsbawm dies, aged 95

Eric Hobsbawm at home, 20 August 2003 Eric Hobsbawm joined the Communist Party aged 14

Eric Hobsbawm, one of Britain's most eminent historians, has died at the age of 95, his family have confirmed.

He died in the early hours of Monday morning at the Royal Free Hospital in London where he had been suffering from pneumonia, his daughter Julia said.

Mr Hobsbawm, a historian in the Marxist tradition, wrote more than 30 books.

His reputation rests largely on four works, including History of the 20th Century, The Age of Extremes, which has been translated into 40 languages.

In a statement his family said: "He will be greatly missed not only by his wife of 50 years, Marlene, and his three children, seven grandchildren and great grandchild, but also by his many thousands of readers and students around the world."

Born to Jewish parents in Egypt in 1917, the year of the Russian Revolution, Prof Hobsbawm's life and works were shaped by his commitment to radical socialism.
'Extraordinary century'

His British father and Austrian mother moved to Vienna when he was two, then to Berlin.

He joined the Communist Party aged 14, after he had been orphaned and was living with his uncle.

Prof Hobsbawm in conversation with Jeremy Paxman in January

In his 80s he reflected: "Anybody who saw Hitler's rise happen first-hand could not have helped but be shaped by it, politically. That boy is still somewhere inside, always will be."

In 1933, with Hitler's grip on power tightening, he came to London. After gaining a PhD from Cambridge, he published his first book in 1948.

Hobsbawm was appointed a lecturer at Birkbeck College in London in 1947, spending his entire career on the faculty and eventually being appointed president.

His best-known works were the three-volume history of the 19th century and his book the Age of Extremes which covered the eight decades from WWI to the collapse of communism in Europe.

He published his final book, How to Change the World, in 2011.
'Good, readable books'

Hobsbawm said he had lived "through almost all of the most extraordinary and terrible century in human history".

An unrepentant Marxist, he acknowledged the failure of 20th Century communism but said he had not given up on Marxist ideals.

In April, he told fellow historian Simon Schama he would like to be remembered as "somebody who not only kept the flag flying, but who showed that by waving it you can actually achieve something, if only good and readable books".

Labour leader Ed Miliband said Hobsbawn was "an extraordinary historian, a man passionate about his politics and a great friend of his family".

"His historical works brought hundreds of years of British history to hundreds of thousands of people. He brought history out of the ivory tower and into people's lives," he said.

"But he was not simply an academic, he cared deeply about the political direction of the country. Indeed he was one of the first people to recognise the challenges to Labour in the late 1970s and 1980s from the changing nature of our society."

(Source, plus link to obituary: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19786929)

Hobsbawm on BBC TV, earlier this year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oe-puSGYxRA
 
I guess nobody has heard of the late Mr Hobsbawm... That's too bad.

It hasn't even been a day yet, WH is not exactly the busiest subforum in the world.


Anyway, I've read the main 4 books he is famous for. I remember liking them, but it's been a while since I've read them. Now seems like a good point to start up again.
 
I was reading The Age of Empire this morning before I heard the news. Sad to hear. His books got me into social history.
 
I guess nobody has heard of the late Mr Hobsbawm... That's too bad.

We did. And it is a sad piece of news. :( I real his autobiography recently and he certainly had an interesting life following the big conflicts of the 20th century, which explains approach to history and why he wrote such interesting books.
 
Sounds like an incredible man. What a loss this is.
 
I've read excerpts of his books at uni, but I don't think I've ever sat down and read one from start to finish. Seems like a good time to do so.
 
I read Age of Extreme's and Age of Empire. I'll have to check out the rest of his books.
 
I've read excerpts of his books at uni, but I don't think I've ever sat down and read one from start to finish. Seems like a good time to do so.

Certainly. Tap into his ideas of the Dual Revolution and the Long Nineteenth Century. Very good historical approach, IMO. Marxist, of course, in all the good ways.
 
I guess nobody has heard of the late Mr Hobsbawm... That's too bad.

Here is the late Christopher Hitchins on him

To have marched in the last legal Communist demonstration in Berlin in 1933 may have been an experience as delicious as protracted sexual intercourse (Hobsbawm’s metaphor, not mine), but the experience of defending the indefensible and — more insulting — of being asked to believe the unbelievable was far less delightful and, equally to the point, very much more protracted. Again, Hobsbawm’s vices mutate into his virtues (and vice, as it were, versa). He is determined to show that he was not a dupe, but went into it all with eyes open, while he is no less concerned to argue that he did not want to become one of those ”God That Failed” ex-Communists.

Is this idealism or cynicism? He was one of a group of solid and brilliant English Marxist historians, including Christopher Hill and Edward Thompson and John Saville, none of whom could stomach the Communist Party after 1956. Yet he soldiered on as a member until the end of the Soviet Union itself, while admitting that he hardly ever visited the place and that when he did, he didn’t much care for it.

Now he tells us that he suffers nostalgia for what he never much liked. I think he has nostalgia all right. He mourns the lost Britain of trams and bicycles and hiking and cheap lodging and labor solidarity, and he misses the intellectual companionship of a Europe, part Parisian and part Mitteleuropa, where names like Henri Lefebvre and Ernst Fischer really meant something. He also possesses a strong feeling for the Italy that took Antonio Gramsci seriously and, in his absorbing passages on his long stays in the United States, says that he felt most at home in the 1950’s of jazz and the Village and counter-McCarthyite bohemia. (Under the nom de plume of Francis Newton he was for many years a jazz critic of some aplomb.)

I would say that by 1968 Hobsbawm had become a fairly distinguished political and cultural conservative. He already knew that the Soviet Union was going nowhere but down, and in Latin America, where Communist revolution was still thinkable, he regarded the idea as neither possible nor desirable.

link
 
Great extract, del62. Re the idea of Hobsbawm as conservative: after reading Tony Benn's autobiography, I spent about a week feeling completely demoralized about socialism. It became clear that his socialism was completely bound up with his family inheritance. Benn's conservative personality is what leads to his total inability to consider revising mid-20th century Tribune socialism in any aspect. I couldn't help wondering how much my allegiance to socialism has the same origins.

It matters, of course, because socialism that is not radical (change from the roots up) is inherently hypocritical.
 
I know I'm a few days late, but I'm sorry to hear the news. I'm halfway through his "big 4" now.

I didn't realize he published so many books. If someone has read beyond the big 4, would you recommend them?
 
The Invention of Tradition is my favorite of his books, and probably the most enlightening.
 
Back
Top Bottom