Ethnonationalism

echinococcus said:
I admire how the French managed to put an end to this in their country. Wherever these people are from, whatever their skin-colour is, they all regard themselves as French. Similarly, Atatürk of the Turks united many peoples in one nation-state.
Gecko1 said:
Ataturk acually expelled a bunch of greeks and christian turks.
The late Ottoman state conducted the first modern genocide against the Armenians, making the modern Turkish nation-state possible. Often the uncompromising universalism of enlightenment thinking results in the worst atrocities because all dissent is swept aside - all in the name of progress. French Imperialism contained a paradox in that it preached universal education and rational production much more so than, say, British Imperialism, but in reality le mission civilisatrice worked as a steamroller, eradicating culture and particularity on a massive scale.

Similarly, one could argue that the failure of US Iraq policy in the period of 2003-2006 derives from it's classic French imperial doctrine. The tendency now is towards a British Imperial approach which seems to work much better, utilizing local power structures but relinquishing claims to democracy promotion etc.
I guess if things continue to improve the US might relapse, as the US is basically biased towards French Imperial ambition. I see this as very likely if McCain is pres.

TDK
 
echinococcus said:
I admire how the French managed to put an end to this in their country. Wherever these people are from, whatever their skin-colour is, they all regard themselves as French. Similarly, Atatürk of the Turks united many peoples in one nation-state.
Echinococcus, you being a German I understand where you are coming from qua the French constitutional model being more likable than the blood and soil ideologies of the German past. It's just strange that you put forth Ataturk's Turkey as an example to follow, knowing that they had to wipe out 2 million people to get there. But maybe you didn't know?

TDK
 
I'm not so sure. Perhaps some Corsicans.

But I don't think Bretons base this on ethinicity. It's more a question of customs, like getting drunk while playing strange music

Your are Franks, they're Celts. We've had this discussion before, Steph.:rolleyes:

As far as them getting drunk and playing strange music, who doesn't?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Your are Franks, they're Celts. We've had this discussion before, Steph.:rolleyes:

As far as them getting drunk and playing strange music, who doesn't?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
I don't drink alcohol, and I can't play any music :(.

Beside, I'm not Frank, I'm Savoyard :p. With a mix of Russian, Romanian, Turkish and Chouan ancestry I think
 
Echinococcus, you being a German I understand where you are coming from qua the French constitutional model being more likable than the blood and soil ideologies of the German past. It's just strange that you put forth Ataturk's Turkey as an example to follow, knowing that they had to wipe out 2 million people to get there. But maybe you didn't know?

TDK

Yeah, thanks for reminding me.
 
People should have a right to identify and govern themselves as they please.

For the US, that has meant identifying with a secular government primarily, and then as an ethnicity, etc.

If another society sees things a different way, that's their choice, and what right do I have to tell them how to identify themselves? Isn't that a fundamental aspect of self-determination? Can you really have self-determination without free identification?
 
I admire how the French managed to put an end to this in their country. Wherever these people are from, whatever their skin-colour is, they all regard themselves as French.
Similarly, Atatürk of the Turks united many peoples in one nation-state.

In Germany we need more of this too, since tension with immigrants increases, and they also form a big part of the "lower class".

I disagree with this, nominally everyone is French, but if you are not BBR* your chances are not the same as everyone else's.

An example of not everyone agreeing that they are French and only French is the wearing of Algerian jerseys to support Zinedine Zidane rather than France.

* BBR = Bleu Blanc Rouge or Blue White and Red, ie French French
 
OK. Why? Please elaborate.

I'm not saying Nazism is good, it just ain't... evil.

It definitely is evil. Have you actually read what the Nazi party stood for?

Please, you really don't want to reinforce the belief that there's still Nazi sympathizers in Sweden do you?

As for ethnonationalism, I think it's outdated. I'm all for nationalism but not ethnonationalism.

EDIT: But like Bill300 said below, we here in the States don't have the kind of nationalism you might have in europe, so my support of nationalism might look a bit weird.
 
Ethnonationalism is precisely why the balkans (including Turkey) is so screwed up.

I know, right? Gosh. Those Americans, loving America. Sure have ripped this country apart.
We have no major minorities that have a sense of ethnonationalism. Natives got screwed cuz we beat 'em, and we don't have the First Nation policies that Canada has. The only possible minority that I can think of that would even consider it would be mexicans, but that's so far from mainstream that it's not even funny. Nationalism in the european sense simply doesn't exist here.
 
I don't drink alcohol, and I can't play any music :(.

Beside, I'm not Frank, I'm Savoyard :p. With a mix of Russian, Romanian, Turkish and Chouan ancestry I think

SAVOYARD = Italian? So you're not really French either, then. Sorry you
don't get drunk or play strange music though. Must be a quiet life for you.
BTW What's a "Chouan"?:confused:
 
Franks? Celts? You mean 1500 years ago, right?

No I mean now. Steph said "we're all French now". Some of his fellow citizens
would still disagree, even after 1500 years.:)
 
Back
Top Bottom