Evil Atheist Thread

I like atheists. :) Except when they behave worse than the very people they despise.
 
Cool! I like cheese.


Some people find ultimate truth in religious texts, others find it in mathematical texts. As long as both are happy, no harm done, IMO.

Come on, I didn't invent that cheese planet stuff so you can weasel out from improving yourself by looking what illogical fallacy means. You wrote the same stuff, just in different words.

OK, let's have another example. For simplicity of the example let's say there's been only 99 monotheistic religions in the history of mankind. (Note: These are not mathematically correct, but it won't affect the point and will make it simpler, plus I'm just lazy to calculate)
Now we ask a question - "Is there a god?" - and not specify any particular god - just if there is any god. All right, the probability for there being a god would be 99%, 1% being there is none.
Now we ask - "Is there an islamic god?" - meaning what are the possibilities for just that one particular god being there. Percents would be 1% for yes, there is an god. While 99% would be there isn't an god.

Do you see the "awesomeness" of "I can't prove, you can't prove" logic there? Wrongfully often titled as common sense. Of course theres been thousands of religions and beliefs in world so the possiblity for there not being a god would be 99.9999...% and rising for each new religion. But for islamic (and christian and pastafari among the others) god 99.9999...% Gosh, I hope there's no concept of christian hell in most religions...
*gasp* What if the god is outside of the 99 religions range? What if god is this guy I just imagined, or saw at TV? (Why I have feeling that you, an agnostic, when talking about god you think about this jolly good bearded white sheet god with low masculine voice with a little echo?)

In short: Not the 50% chance with your flawed logic which disgraces the capability of human brains. Or can you say every lotto number from this day to 1322 (not 1321!) years into the future will be same because there's a chance for it? It can be or it can't be.
 
Richard Dawkins and the other militant antireligious and antitheist atheists attacking religion in their own little crusade.
 
Richard Dawkins and the other militant antireligious and antitheist atheists attacking religion in their own little crusade.

I think we just got a new label. There's agnostics (not sure whether a higher power exists or not, meh), atheists (sure that a higher power doesn't exist), and antitheists (sure that a higher power doesn't exist, and working to reduce the number of theists in their community).
 
I think we just got a new label. There's agnostics (not sure whether a higher power exists or not, meh), atheists (sure that a higher power doesn't exist), and antitheists (sure that a higher power doesn't exist, and working to reduce the number of theists in their community).
Or as Ian McDonald puts it:
I like to visit "headline" sites such as Digg and Reddit, and it seems that every third or fourth story (particularly on the latter) is about atheism, or criticism/bashing of religion. What's interesting is, almost every day on these sites, you'll see stories with headlines such as "Atheist group vows to destroy Christianity", or "Religion the cause of all evil, says prominent atheist", or "Believers are gullible morons, incapable of rational thought, dress funny and have bad teeth, according to latest atheist bestseller". Then every so often, you'll see a headline like "Atheists least trusted group in America, often face discrimination."

Vicious cycle, anyone?
 
Atheists are surprisingly osessed with God.

While there is good reason not to believe in god, I don't undestand why some people find it so necessary to attack other peoples beliefs. If religious people justify bigotry with their god, it might be ok, but even then it isn't probably the best way. It would be better to refute their believes from their own premisses (which in many cases is possible). If somebody just believes in god, why say anything? Do you have need to argue against me, if I declare that I believe in Father Christmas?
 
Atheism can be dangerous. If I don't believe in some form of divine retribution for my earthly sins, what's going to prevent me from committing them if and when I know that I could get away with it?
 
Atheists are fine when they respect those who believe in the supernatural. What annoys me are the atheists who think they somehow have greater mental abilities or are more highly evolved than theists.

Atheists are surprisingly osessed with God.

Ironic. :crazyeye:
 
Atheism can be dangerous. If I don't believe in some form of divine retribution for my earthly sins, what's going to prevent me from committing them if and when I know that I could get away with it?
Don't Christians have a get-out-of-divine-retribution-free card? Their resulting moral depravity is the dangerous influence that makes atheists so darned evil.
 
Atheism can be dangerous. If I don't believe in some form of divine retribution for my earthly sins, what's going to prevent me from committing them if and when I know that I could get away with it?

maybe its religion is worst because then you can justify your actions and tell your self your going to get 72 virgins in heavean, or be accepted into the kingdom of heab=vean for reclaiming the holy land, and of course vaallhala you didnt get in if you didnt die in combat.
 
Atheists are surprisingly osessed with God.

if latin americans still made human sacrifices to tlaloc the rain god, i'd be pretty obsessed with tlaloc as well.

Atheists are fine when they respect those who believe in the supernatural. What annoys me are the atheists who think they somehow have greater mental abilities or are more highly evolved than theists.

(satan speaking) why should i respect people who believe in things that have no evidence? should i respect scientologists? should i join the heavens gate cult? are they still accepting members????
 
Why shouldn't you respect people? We all believe in things without evidence, and of course lots of people think they have evidence for their beliefs, but if you really think that not respecting the majority of the human race is a good idea, I think you set your baseline too high. We're not even talking about respecting the beliefs, just the people who hold them.
 
Back
Top Bottom