well... I know I implied that, but that isn't what I was trying to get across.
ok... how about this.
Person A has never told a lie. He never will tell a lie. He says one statement that makes sense to you, and you agree that it is fact. He says another statement that you don't quite get, but you know its true because you know he won't lie at all.
That is what I'm trying to say, that I believe this overall picture is correct, but there are a few parts of that picture that I still don't understand completely enough to defend WHY they are correct.
and I'm just curious... going back to my statement thing. What is your logic as to why statements B & C don't have to be correct if statement A is and they explain it