FEB 10TH: Day of action against Scientology

Things don't have to be against the law for them to be a target of criticism or protest. Though yes, I agree it shouldn't be banned just because we disagree with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology#Controversies has some info on the sorts of things that many are concerned about.

i'm not against the protests you should be able to protest whatever you want no matter how asinine I'm against the hacking
 
I think Scientology is stupid and now a Anonymous group on YouTube has named the 10th of Feb an international day of protest against Scientology.

Link

Anonymous internet users who have previously crashed Church of Scientology websites have named February 10 as a worldwide day of protest in a bid to "destroy" the controversial religion.

The group - called Anonymous - which includes skilled computer hackers, has posted a message on YouTube declaring war on Scientology, accusing it of trying to censor the internet and conducting "campaigns of misinformation".


The apparent catalyst for the attack was YouTube's decision to remove a video of Hollywood star Tom Cruise - one of Scientology's most high-profile recruits - espousing the religion's virtues after the church asked that it be pulled.


"Anonymous has therefore decided that your organisation should be destroyed, for the good of your followers, for the good of mankind, and for our own enjoyment," the statement says.


"We shall proceed to expel you from the internet and systematically dismantle the Church of Scientology in its present form," it continues.


The message, read by a computerised voice and set against a grey cityscape, finishes with the ominous statement: "We are Anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us."


Last week several major Scientology websites crashed in the United States and Britain. The FBI was asked to investigate after envelopes of white powder were sent to 19 Scientology churches in the Los Angeles area.


While Scientology websites now appear to be functioning normally, Anonymous, which has warned "that it does not expect its campaign to be completed in a short time frame", may yet be saving its largest attack for February 10.


New videos claiming to be from Anonymous have been posted on YouTube, naming February 10 as an international day of protest against Scientology.


Named Project Chanology, the protests are being organised through Facebook groups and online chat rooms, with official Scientology websites and even its buildings being touted as targets.


Protests are organised for cities including Sydney, New York, Los Angles, London, Vancouver and Stockholm.


A former hacker turned security analyst for government departments and large companies told The Age Anonymous was not an organised group of hackers, but a mass of people - probably young men - joining message board groups and targeting organisations they saw as impeding free speech and expression.


"They are anonymous message boards, which means they can post anything without fear of reprisal," the analyst, who asked not to be named, said.


"They'll do something like all join a Ku Klux Klan website at once and stuff it up."


Given nature of the organisation, the action planed for February 10 could involve just "a few kids in glasses showing up and asking stupid questions" - or "really radical elements".


"You can't pin it on a person or a group of people. You've thousands of people engaged to do anything they can against Scientology.


"But what you may well get is the Church of Scientology using this to encourage authorities to go after the concept of anonymity on the internet."


A spokeswoman for Scientology in Australia said authorities were dealing with the threats.


The spokeswoman said the church wanted the Tom Cruise video removed from YouTube because it was a pirated version of footage that Scientology held copyright over.


"The pirated and edited excerpts of Mr Cruise were contained in an official church event in 2004, an event attended by 5,000 Scientologists and their guests.


"Having presented these selective and out-of-context excerpts with the intent of creating both controversy and ridicule, nevertheless resulted in people searching for and visiting Church of Scientology websites.


"Those wishing to find out the Church of Scientology's views and to gain context of the video have the right to search official church websites if they so desire."





YouTube LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ
 
They proved me wrong, the protests came, some decent, some where pethetic, but they happened.
 

Attachments

  • anon.JPG
    anon.JPG
    64.4 KB · Views: 145
They proved me wrong, the protests came, some decent, some where pethetic, but they happened.

Oh yeah I'm told there were 60-90 people at the Sydney one.
 
Yea, our protest in DC had 60-80 people in it. We had a microphone and speakers and signs and flyers. It was all around good =D
 
My friend left for St. Louis an hour ago.
 
They proved me wrong, the protests came, some decent, some where pethetic, but they happened.
I'm not sure if this is intended as a joke, or what, but see http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=939&Focus=21095 , http://www.flickr.com/photos/victan/sets/72157603883434477/ and http://www.news.com.au/technology/gallery/0,23607,5029503-5007151,00.html for some more pics. Rather amusingly (or sadly), news.com.au had to blur out one of the billboards for fear of legal threats - the sign said "CULT" (it was on their front page, but the pic's not there anymore).

(And I note there are few if any "fat spotty geeks" as claimed earlier. Quite a few girls too - probably more of a proportion than on this forum...)

Whatever their numbers, it's still achieved some mainstream media coverage, and it's more numbers protesting against scientology (it's not like protests against scientology are anything new, they just haven't received the media coverage before).
 
the one in seattle had a bunch of people that were j ust as loony as the scientologists.
 
the one in seattle had a bunch of people that were j ust as loony as the scientologists.

Please. Protesters in general are as loony as the thing they're protesting. The anti-war protests I saw in Seattle in 2003? WHEW WEE every nut job had crawled out of the woodwork!
 
Yeah, somehow I get the feeling Scientology could swing this into a PR victory. A bunch of young, eccentric computer nerds aren't really the best group to face off against a well-organized, experienced, and ruthless corporation.
 
Yeah, somehow I get the feeling Scientology could swing this into a PR victory. A bunch of young, eccentric computer nerds aren't really the best group to face off against a well-organized, experienced, and ruthless corporation.
From what I've seen in the mainstream media so far, being "nerds" doesn't seem to be an issue - plus if anything, I'd say it's more likely for them to be brushed off as not a real threat. (It's only here that them being "nerds" is drawing such criticism, which as I say I find rather odd given the rather nerdish nature of this site.)

The bigger issue is the association with "hackers", which of course isn't helped by the DoS attacks. I also fear that the CoS will play the "hatred against religion" sympathy card, as it's all too easy for people to hide behind religion. (All the more reason to emphasis why they are a cult, and different to other religions.)
 
Oh, boy, you done it now! Xenu gona get you!
Just kidding, I'm not a scientologist, although I don't really have anything against it.
 
Back
Top Bottom