1. Did you even read what I said? Does the terms pre op and posy op mean anything to you? Well if you go back and read what I said you will see that I narrowed down the argument o the pre op king of transsexual and it is those that I focused on.
2. Well I would be uncomfortable with sharing a urinal with some one who looks like they are the opposite sex, but still has there male member still attached. Since they have chosen to live there lives as a woman they should go to the toilet as a woman, otherwise they are not being true to themselves if they say that they want to live life as the opposite sex, then be fully that or not at all and this would not be a problem at all
Wow, how surprisingly rude of you! I never would have expected that tone from you.
Yes, I read what you said. That's why I replied to it. I do in fact understand the terms pre-op and post-op. I'm not sure you read what
I said. Those terms only apply if an "op" is involved. Here, I'll say it again.
Not every transsexual gets the bits switched. As in
ever. They're not pre-op or post-op, they're no-op, since there's not going to be any switching. You don't consider yourself pre-op, do you?
So you'd be uncomfortable. I'm sorry to hear that. Luckily for us, you're not the decider when it comes to other peoples' sexual identities, nor are you an authoritative judge on whether or not someone is being true to their self.
As for "this would not be a problem at all", people bending themselves into
your standards isn't some kind of Sola Solutio. I'll just quote Mac again.
So the trick is to not be stupid or rude about the whole restroom thing.
If people could do
that, this would not be a problem at all.
