If you don't think the Republican party, that for decades called for the explicit and implicit discrimination of certain groups, is bigoted then you inhabit a seperate reality or universe, one in which only you experience that has no connection or mooring with the lived experiences of real life people nor reality they experience.
Like for god's ****ing sake man, the GOP literally left the LGBTQ community to suffer and die from aids not only because they believed it was akin to god punishing the wicked, but because they viewed them as a group worthy of suffering and death!
This is a matter of historical fact! Get. A. Grip.
Decades ago doesn't equal today. The Republican party is currently discriminating against certain groups today? What's with your vendetta? What are your thoughts on black people and other minority groups that vote and support the Republican party? Where do they stand in all this?
If we are as intolerant as you claim, it should be easy for you to provide us an example of the community running out someone with innocuous beliefs through bullying.
FWIW, I don't need to put in an effort in discrediting your argument. You do this well enough all on your own.
Bullying doesn't necessary mean that the individual/individual's being bullied are going to be "run out" or leave the community, a common reason for bullying is to silence opinions you don't like.
Implying that someone's own argument has discredited itself still requires evidence. I've already provided the evidence why I think you're comments are weak and easily discredited. It reminds me of the episode of the Simpson's where Homer gets into a fight with the garbage men, subsequently the garbage services are cut off, Homer runs for the Sanitizer Commissioners job, during the debate with Commissioner Ray Patterson, Homer offers nothing constructive to the debate, other than cringe worthy cheesy sarcastic jeers and satirical humor, of course the simpletons in the crowd watching the debate find it hilarious, Homer gets elected and of course the garbage service collapses in no time.
You're Homer in this analogy by the way if you didn't already work this out.
Have you offered anything tangible to the discussion? Not doing so would be the typical use case for sarcasm and mockery, as ideas would actually be engaged with.
I believe I have. Truth telling and rational logical discussions are not democratic, no matter how many "likes" your post gets.
I've bullied some folks outta here and have not a shred of remorse.
Did they leave because you bullied them or because your debating technique was terrible, they probably got bored and left?
It's just what they do here. It doesn't matter what you say, they know what you think, and because they know what you think they can retrospectively interpret everything you say through the lens of knowing what you're really saying. It's lots of fun isn't it. Basically it doesn't really matter what you actually say, or even if you say something that is essentially identical to something one of their friends has said and they have "liked". If you're on the list of disapproved persons, you'll get flak.
What I've found from my observations here is you have to agree completely with their premises 100% otherwise you're an outsider of their "group", they also love to misrepresent what you say. For example I acknowledged and agreed that police officers that commit acts of violence against protestors untowardly should face prosecution, but because I don't agree with their premise that "they are all evil" I must be this racist hate filled bigot, and rather than address the argument made, they try and paint you as a "cartoon villain" with snide and sarcastic remarks because its easier to brush aside what you have said rather than actually address the points being made, its sloppy and lazy debating tactics.
denial of reality will always equal denial of equality. If you do not understand the concept of white privilege do yourself a favor and read into past your own biases. That way when you post garbage like this it would not be so clear you never have challenged your own biases.
I am aware of the concept of white privilege, I just don't agree with the premise of it.
Censorship of overtly racist garbage is not oppression. You seem to think it is. Bullying online is a stupid concept when the people being bullied are generally advocating garbage positions like “race realism” or “white identity positions”.
You used the word "generally advocating", so its an acknowledgement of yours that you yourself know that some of the people being bullied aren't really advocating those positions, you just don't like what they are saying.